IRC log of tsdtf on 2008-07-01
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:32:23 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf
- 12:32:23 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/07/01-tsdtf-irc
- 12:32:29 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #tsdtf
- 12:32:35 [shadi]
- zakim, this will bbe tsd
- 12:32:35 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will bbe tsd', shadi
- 12:32:40 [shadi]
- zakim, this will be tsd
- 12:32:40 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start 2 minutes ago
- 12:32:57 [shadi]
- zakim, code?
- 12:32:57 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 8783 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), shadi
- 12:33:06 [shadi]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 12:33:06 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has not yet started, shadi
- 12:33:07 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, Christophe, shadi, carlosI
- 12:33:18 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started
- 12:33:25 [Zakim]
- +Christophe_Strobbe
- 12:33:41 [Zakim]
- +shadi
- 12:33:53 [Zakim]
- +CarlosI
- 12:35:40 [Christophe]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Jun/0024.html
- 12:35:48 [Christophe]
- Chair: Christophe
- 12:36:19 [Christophe]
- regrets: CarlosV, Tim
- 12:36:55 [Christophe]
- Agenda+ Reviewing remapped test samples
- 12:37:05 [Christophe]
- Agenda+ Schedule for meetings during July-August(-September)
- 12:37:06 [shadi]
- scribe: Shadi
- 12:37:55 [shadi]
- CS: a few things that need clarification
- 12:39:41 [shadi]
- ...testElement, elementName, and specReference are child nodes of testElements
- 12:40:07 [shadi]
- CI: testElements was designed according to the WCAG 2.0 Baseline approach
- 12:40:19 [shadi]
- ...we kept it until we see what happens with WCAG 2.0
- 12:40:27 [shadi]
- ...still a pending decision
- 12:41:03 [shadi]
- ...time to move on, now that we have a clear view of how the WCAG 2.0 concept looks like
- 12:41:25 [shadi]
- ...need to take a decision and update the metadata accordingly
- 12:41:49 [shadi]
- CS: the test elements are very useful for filtering the test sample
- 12:42:15 [shadi]
- ...WCAG WG looking at creating data to define Accessibility Supported Technologies
- 12:42:37 [shadi]
- ...if we drop this, we may drop data that WCAG WG may be interested in
- 12:45:07 [shadi]
- SAZ: seems to be a real issue, we have not revisted this concept since the change of Baseline
- 12:45:27 [shadi]
- ...however, AST still under discussion in WCAG WG
- 12:45:46 [shadi]
- ...may be best to wait for PR stage of the guidelines until the approach is more stable
- 12:45:53 [shadi]
- ...and we understand the requirements
- 12:46:11 [shadi]
- ...we can drop this data at anytime, it is not hindering our work right now
- 12:47:27 [shadi]
- SAZ: maybe we should add the sub-nodes of testElements in the metadata
- 12:47:45 [shadi]
- ...knowing that it is under discussion and could be dropped at any time
- 12:48:09 [shadi]
- action: CS update the metadata document to reflect the subnodes under testElements
- 12:49:40 [shadi]
- CS: added some notes in the metadata to help me keep track of the updated test samples
- 12:50:11 [shadi]
- ...between what is uploaded and what is on the BenToWeb site
- 12:51:37 [shadi]
- SAZ: ok to keep these internal notes for now, but should clarify that it is an internal note
- 12:51:49 [shadi]
- ...knowing that they will be dropped when our work is finalized
- 12:52:33 [shadi]
- CI: agree that internal notes are fine, but think we are setting a bad example to misuse elements for a different purpose than it was intended for
- 12:55:03 [shadi]
- SAZ: could we drop this information in the description element?
- 12:55:24 [shadi]
- CI: maybe better to add a specific element for this purpose
- 12:55:43 [shadi]
- ...this could be shown or hidden depending on the audience or usage
- 12:55:54 [shadi]
- ...but keep that information separate
- 12:58:46 [shadi]
- zakim, pick a victim
- 12:58:46 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose CarlosI
- 12:59:17 [shadi]
- SAZ: how much additional work is this?
- 12:59:25 [shadi]
- CS: not much work
- 12:59:35 [shadi]
- SAZ: should give a heads-up to the group first
- 12:59:56 [shadi]
- action: CI send a heads-up to the group about adding a new element for internal/development comments
- 13:01:54 [shadi]
- CS: comment on pointers in test sample 18
- 13:03:40 [shadi]
- CI: seems to be inconsistent usage of pointers, need a minimum set of rules on how to use them
- 13:04:22 [shadi]
- CS: would be good to have some rules
- 13:05:28 [shadi]
- CI: could write some
- 13:05:43 [shadi]
- SAZ: doesn't this relate to the Pointers-in-RDF document?
- 13:06:00 [shadi]
- CI: it does, and might be good to address this somewhere
- 13:09:04 [shadi]
- action: SAZ bring this discussion into the ERT WG discussion on Pointers-in-RDF document, to see if these type of rules belong in there
- 13:12:00 [shadi]
- CS: comment on relative vs absolute URI's in test sample 30
- 13:12:15 [shadi]
- SAZ: understand that relative ones are easier for portability
- 13:12:35 [shadi]
- ...but absolute ones are easier to work with for people not logged on the server
- 13:12:53 [shadi]
- CS: can we keep until we have the HTML interface on W3 servers?
- 13:13:13 [shadi]
- [no objections]
- 13:16:03 [shadi]
- CS: question on validity in test sample 2
- 13:16:14 [shadi]
- SAZ: might be best to check offline
- 13:18:12 [shadi]
- zakim, take up next
- 13:18:12 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Reviewing remapped test samples" taken up [from Christophe]
- 13:18:19 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 2
- 13:18:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Schedule for meetings during July-August(-September)" taken up [from Christophe]
- 13:18:30 [shadi]
- SAZ: confirmed is July 15
- 13:20:11 [shadi]
- SAZ: seem we have low availability from 21 july until end august
- 13:20:23 [shadi]
- ...let's figure out week by week
- 13:21:14 [Zakim]
- -shadi
- 13:21:18 [Zakim]
- -Christophe_Strobbe
- 13:21:22 [Zakim]
- -CarlosI
- 13:21:23 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended
- 13:21:24 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Christophe_Strobbe, shadi, CarlosI
- 14:06:36 [shadi]
- zakim, bye
- 14:06:36 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #tsdtf
- 14:06:44 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 14:06:48 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:06:48 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/01-tsdtf-minutes.html shadi
- 14:06:49 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 14:06:53 [shadi]
- rrsagent, bye
- 14:06:53 [RRSAgent]
- I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/01-tsdtf-actions.rdf :
- 14:06:53 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: CS update the metadata document to reflect the subnodes under testElements [1]
- 14:06:53 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/01-tsdtf-irc#T12-48-09
- 14:06:53 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: CI send a heads-up to the group about adding a new element for internal/development comments [2]
- 14:06:53 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/01-tsdtf-irc#T12-59-56
- 14:06:53 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: SAZ bring this discussion into the ERT WG discussion on Pointers-in-RDF document, to see if these type of rules belong in there [3]
- 14:06:53 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/01-tsdtf-irc#T13-09-04