13:59:13 RRSAgent has joined #bpwg 13:59:13 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/06/24-bpwg-irc 13:59:15 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:59:15 Zakim has joined #bpwg 13:59:17 Zakim, this will be BPWG 13:59:17 ok, trackbot; I see MWI_BPWG(CTTF)10:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 13:59:18 Meeting: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 13:59:18 Date: 24 June 2008 13:59:30 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Jun/0040.html 13:59:34 Chair: francois 13:59:53 hgerlach has joined #bpwg 14:00:31 MWI_BPWG(CTTF)10:00AM has now started 14:00:37 +Francois 14:00:56 Pontus has joined #bpwg 14:01:14 zakim, code? 14:01:14 the conference code is 2283 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), jo 14:01:29 rob has joined #bpwg 14:01:30 + +049211aaaa 14:01:34 +??P19 14:01:59 + +0208995aabb 14:02:10 zakim, aabb is me 14:02:11 andrews has joined #bpwg 14:02:13 + +0207287aacc 14:02:13 Hi Guys, I saw you did a great job while the F2F - Thanks a lot 14:02:21 zakim, aaaa is me 14:02:25 +jo; got it 14:02:25 zakim, aacc is me 14:02:31 +francois; got it 14:02:37 +rob; got it 14:03:14 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:03:17 zakim, ??P19 is heiko 14:03:26 On the phone I see Francois, francois, ??P19, jo, rob 14:03:28 +heiko; got it 14:03:56 + +0789972aadd 14:03:56 zakim, francois is really Pontus 14:03:58 sorry, francois, I do not recognize a party named 'francois' 14:04:09 zakim, aadd is andrews 14:04:09 +andrews; got it 14:04:12 zakim, aadd is andrews 14:04:12 sorry, jo, I do not recognize a party named 'aadd' 14:04:31 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:04:31 On the phone I see Francois, francois, heiko, jo, rob, andrews 14:04:34 zakim, Francois is really pontus 14:04:34 sorry, jo, I do not recognize a party named 'Francois' 14:05:25 zakim, who is making noise? 14:05:29 zakim, mute me 14:05:29 sorry, Pontus, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 14:05:35 jo, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: andrews (31%), heiko (31%), francois (9%), jo (15%) 14:05:49 zakim, mute heiko 14:05:49 heiko should now be muted 14:05:54 SeanP has joined #bpwg 14:06:01 zakim, mute andrews 14:06:02 andrews should now be muted 14:06:14 zakim, silence is golden 14:06:14 sorry, jo, I do not recognize a party named 'silence' 14:06:43 + +1.630.414.aaee 14:06:51 zakim, aaee is me 14:06:51 +SeanP; got it 14:07:07 scribe: Jo 14:08:07 Topic: Summary from F2F 14:08:31 francois: a great deal of progress - spent whole day of first day on it 14:08:39 ... want to summarise the progress 14:08:48 ... as listed in the agenda 14:09:08 ... 1) we are going to make the doc normative, means rechartering the group 14:09:41 ... 2) "extensive" discussion about link element and decided to re-introduce "link to self" 14:10:41 ... we discussed the semantics of link element and resolved a convention to disambiguate the two senses of link element viz "I am" vs "I can be" mobile friendly 14:11:10 ... 3) we decided to rewrite sect 4.1.2 as "proxy treatment of HTTP request" 14:11:27 ... 4) use of OPTIONS was relegated to "scope for future work" 14:12:04 ... 5) we remain silent on whether a CT proxy should be mobileOK and whether it may/should leave mobileOK content alone 14:12:36 ... 6) we are not going to discuss "session" but discuss "Web site" and leave the term undefined 14:13:27 ... don't have to do content tasting on all resources of a Web site but should be done when following a link to a new Web site 14:13:53 ... 7) no difference between proxies that do URI rewriting and those that don't 14:14:04 ... hence URI rewriting proxies are in scope 14:14:46 .... 8) we're going to move the requirements to Scope and remove the ones we could not meet into scope for future work 14:15:13 ... 9) so now we are left with persistent expression of user preferences 14:15:34 ... as the remaining outstanding issue 14:15:35 q? 14:15:40 AI 261? 14:15:42 ... any questions or comments? 14:16:28 heiko: ref ISSUE-261, I mentioned that I would like to have an allow list 14:16:44 francois: allow and disallow list is part of the remaining issue 14:17:53 heiko: [@@ scribe could not hear] 14:18:13 francois: we will come back to allow and disallow list as part of the discussion of this issue 14:18:36 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Jun/0054.html minutes F2F day on CT 14:18:41 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:18:48 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:18:48 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/24-bpwg-minutes.html jo 14:19:58 Topic: ACTION-769 14:20:02 ACTION-769? 14:20:02 ACTION-769 -- François Daoust to ping Soonho on providing feedback -- due 2008-06-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW 14:20:02 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/769 14:20:22 Close ACTION-769 14:20:22 ACTION-769 Ping Soonho on providing feedback closed 14:20:25 q+ 14:20:33 ACTION-711? 14:20:33 ACTION-711 -- Soonho Lee to provide Feedback on Content Transformation Document -- due 2008-03-13 -- OPEN 14:20:33 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/711 14:21:09 ACTION: daoust to see with Soonho if he can find someone else to provide feedback on the document 14:21:09 Created ACTION-804 - See with Soonho if he can find someone else to provide feedback on the document [on François Daoust - due 2008-07-01]. 14:21:10 francois: soonho has moved to a new job, so can't do it 14:21:22 jo: how about findign someone else to pick it up? 14:21:32 s/findign/finding/ 14:21:47 Topic: ISSUE-242 14:22:05 francois: we started discussing this at the F2F but we ran out of time and were totally knackered 14:22:20 s/knackered/exhausted/ 14:22:48 ... we decided that it's permissible to ask for a restructured version on a site by site basis 14:23:19 ... if there is a blanker user preference, if there are multiple representations then the CT proxy should tell the user 14:24:07 ... we clarified that a CT proxy where there is an arrangement with the server this is out of scope of the guidelines, it counts as adaptation 14:24:45 ... the no-transform directive means that a redirect is needed 14:25:09 ... @@@ could not quite keep up, referenced in agenda 14:25:43 francois: I want to know if we agree on the goal of addressing section 3.2 "Control of the behavior of the proxy" 14:26:04 ... the idea is to integrate this section in the rest of the document 14:26:30 ... and it addresses Sean's point as to clarifying where user control ... 14:26:42 q+ 14:26:55 ack jo 14:27:20 Zarkim, unmute me 14:27:36 Zakim, unmute me 14:27:36 andrews should no longer be muted 14:29:18 jo: I think that we should have a new draft before considering this in detail 14:29:26 ack andrews 14:29:41 ... enough of the document has changed to make it difficult to see how this all pans out without doing htis 14:30:46 ... unfortuantely I am not going to get to this for a little while as I have to do a draft of BP and one of mobileOK as top priority to meet the 15 July timeframe for major announcement of BP work 14:31:21 francois: ref discussion last week, then we may be able to integrate more clearly where control takes effect 14:31:54 ... and indicate quite clearly where control takes effect 14:32:06 q+ 14:32:10 [above in answer to a question from Andrews requesting clarification] 14:32:31 ack SeanP 14:32:32 francois: I think we should continue discussion of the issue on the mailing list 14:32:53 seanP: I agree I am a bit confused now too and am fine with doing it this way 14:33:22 francois: this includes allow and disallow lists in its reference to administrative arrangements 14:33:33 +1 14:33:48 ... in answer to Heiko's earlier question, so we should wait for the updated draft 14:34:06 ... and I am willing to do all the work, Jo, don't worry 14:34:19 [scribe may not have heard the last properly :)] 14:34:56 francois: not sure I made that commitment, Jo 14:35:08 ... any other issues we can take on today's call? 14:35:40 [no comments] 14:35:40 q+ 14:35:49 francois: so let's close the call now 14:35:54 ack hgerlach 14:36:08 heiko: do we have a time line, colleagues are asking 14:37:06 francois: the main issue is that the BP doc is going to rec, and there is other stuff like the mobileOK doc that also needs refreshing and those docs have priority over ct because they are about to make major rec track transitions 14:37:36 ... so basically we are waiting for Jo, and if no one has a comment at that point then we will publish a LCWD and see what people say 14:38:08 q+ 14:38:12 ack jo 14:38:19 bye 14:39:49 jo: content transformation summit event is informally planned for September in London, and we hope to be in Candidate Recommendation by then, or at the very least still in Last Call 14:40:31 jo: hope to have something in next few weeks 14:40:43 francois: OK then let's adjourn 14:40:54 -heiko 14:40:59 -Francois 14:41:07 -francois 14:41:09 zakim, drop me 14:41:09 jo is being disconnected 14:41:11 -jo 14:41:16 -SeanP 14:41:19 -andrews 14:41:25 quit 14:41:30 -rob 14:41:31 MWI_BPWG(CTTF)10:00AM has ended 14:41:32 Attendees were Francois, +049211aaaa, +0208995aabb, +0207287aacc, jo, rob, heiko, +0789972aadd, andrews, +1.630.414.aaee, SeanP 14:41:39 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:41:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/24-bpwg-minutes.html francois 14:41:43 rob has left #bpwg 14:56:29 RRSAgent, bye 14:56:29 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/24-bpwg-actions.rdf : 14:56:29 ACTION: daoust to see with Soonho if he can find someone else to provide feedback on the document [1] 14:56:29 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/24-bpwg-irc#T14-21-09