IRC log of svg on 2008-06-19

Timestamps are in UTC.

10:30:45 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #svg
10:30:45 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/06/19-svg-irc
10:30:46 [ed]
ed has joined #svg
10:30:47 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
10:30:47 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #svg
10:30:49 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG
10:30:49 [Zakim]
ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG()6:30AM scheduled to start now
10:30:50 [trackbot]
Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference
10:30:50 [trackbot]
Date: 19 June 2008
10:31:16 [Zakim]
GA_SVGWG()6:30AM has now started
10:31:23 [Zakim]
+Doug_Schepers
10:31:34 [Zakim]
+??P7
10:31:44 [Zakim]
+??P8
10:31:46 [anthony]
Zakim, ??P7 is me
10:31:46 [Zakim]
+anthony; got it
10:31:51 [ed]
Zakim, ??P8 is me
10:31:51 [Zakim]
+ed; got it
10:32:26 [Zakim]
+??P9
10:32:30 [heycam]
Zakim, ??P9 is me
10:32:30 [Zakim]
+heycam; got it
10:33:08 [ed]
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0144.html
10:33:48 [heycam]
Scribe: Cameron
10:33:52 [heycam]
ScribeNick: heycam
10:34:43 [heycam]
Topic: SVG IG
10:35:11 [heycam]
DS: i met with jeff schiller, who is the co-chair of the SVG IG, along with me
10:35:48 [heycam]
DS: he and i have been working on the wiki and we plan on having a meeting next thursday
10:36:02 [shepazu]
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/IG/wiki/Meeting_2008-06
10:36:34 [heycam]
DS: we want to basically have a very focussed set of first meetings
10:37:14 [heycam]
DS: one thing that the wiki page doesn't mention is the idea of the "japanese chapter"
10:37:26 [heycam]
DS: i'll dedicate a page on the wiki to that
10:38:46 [heycam]
ED: so the acid test stuff, that's possible future activities, why?
10:38:50 [heycam]
DS: this is svg acid tests
10:39:11 [heycam]
DS: why future and not current? because a good acid test will take a while to build. and we don't want to intimidate people.
10:39:25 [heycam]
DS: we want to set a relatively simple goal and meet it and then move on to the next relatively simple goal
10:39:38 [heycam]
DS: and build up into more complex goals
10:39:46 [heycam]
DS: fwiw jeff's already started on it
10:40:11 [heycam]
DS: we have a number of members
10:40:23 [shepazu]
http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=42368
10:40:25 [heycam]
DS: we're hoping to get more
10:40:33 [heycam]
DS: specifically, we're hoping to get more designers
10:41:24 [heycam]
Topic: Public CVS transition
10:41:27 [heycam]
ED: any progress?
10:41:39 [heycam]
DS: i've made some limited progress
10:41:51 [shepazu]
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/
10:42:21 [heycam]
DS: haven't started moving the files over yet
10:42:44 [heycam]
DS: i was hoping that people owning particular modules would move them over
10:43:48 [heycam]
DS: I guess i can just move 1.2 tiny over directly
10:44:40 [heycam]
CM: the tiny build scripts have dependencies outside the 1.2T directory
10:44:44 [heycam]
DS: ultimately we'll have to fix the scripts
10:46:52 [anthony]
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2002
10:46:54 [heycam]
DS: tony, you have a related action to look at scripts and consolidate them?
10:46:58 [heycam]
AG: that's the action
10:47:28 [heycam]
AG: how soon?
10:47:32 [heycam]
DS: next three weeks?
10:47:57 [heycam]
AG: i'd probably just copy the directory over to the new CVS, without checking it in, then get the script running locally first, then commit it
10:48:01 [heycam]
AG: don't think it'd be too difficult
10:49:20 [heycam]
DS: since we're working in public i'm eager to get everything in public
10:49:32 [heycam]
DS: especially because people will be wanting to see why we're making changes in the test suite
10:49:51 [heycam]
ED: so could we expect it to be moved over by some time next week?
10:50:00 [heycam]
s/it/1.2T/
10:50:33 [heycam]
DS: test suite?
10:50:38 [heycam]
ED: no but that would be good to move over too
10:51:40 [heycam]
DS: to start off with i could move the publish/ directory over
10:51:50 [heycam]
AG: the script doesn't look like it does anything too fancy
10:52:25 [heycam]
AG: it doesn't do too much "../../"ing
10:52:28 [heycam]
CM: the idl one might though
10:54:51 [heycam]
DS: somebody said there were some tricky bits. each individual spec had some specialised "bits".
10:55:00 [heycam]
ED: that's what anthony's action is yes, finding the common parts?
10:55:02 [heycam]
DS: right
10:57:51 [heycam]
ED: to clarify, who is moving the spec over?
10:58:07 [heycam]
DS: i will take the action to move over the publish/ directory
10:58:59 [heycam]
DS: should we have a 'spec/' directory in 1.2T/ ?
10:59:04 [heycam]
AG: we have master/ and publish/
10:59:13 [heycam]
AG: don't check anything into the tools/ directory yet
11:00:11 [heycam]
DS: i'll add a master/ and publish/ directory to 1.2T/
11:00:35 [heycam]
DS: i'll move over some of the published stuff, like the in-cvs published 1.2T spec
11:01:03 [heycam]
ACTION: Doug to create a publish/ and master/ directory in CVS, and to copy over the current contents of the 1.2T publish/ directory to dev.w3.org
11:01:04 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-2069 - Create a publish/ and master/ directory in CVS, and to copy over the current contents of the 1.2T publish/ directory to dev.w3.org [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-06-26].
11:02:56 [heycam]
DS: and transition of the test suite?
11:03:01 [heycam]
DS: where should that go?
11:03:06 [heycam]
DS: under 1.2T/, yes?
11:03:15 [heycam]
DS: 1.2T/test/
11:03:41 [heycam]
CM: keeping the same structure in the test suite directory? (like svg, svggen, etc.)
11:03:43 [heycam]
AG: yeah
11:05:29 [heycam]
(we decide to hold off on migrating the test suite for now)
11:05:33 [heycam]
Topic: Testsuite publication
11:06:03 [heycam]
DS: i will do it today
11:06:17 [heycam]
ED: the link from the wiki page is incorrect; it links to the old one
11:06:30 [heycam]
DS: andrew put that link in there and asked me to correct it when it's published, which i'll do
11:06:42 [heycam]
AG: is it easy enough to publish?
11:07:01 [heycam]
DS: chrisl says if you upload a lot at once, it gets confused
11:07:22 [heycam]
Topic: 1.1 errata
11:07:57 [heycam]
ED: i edited errata.xml today, so i'd like to discuss my addition
11:08:11 [ed]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0143.html
11:08:39 [ed]
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/repository/errata/errata.xml#svgtextcontentelement_clarifications
11:09:08 [heycam]
ED: we discussed last time why an exception is thrown for negative method parameters, even though the type is unsigned
11:09:28 [heycam]
ED: so i'm wondering if this is something we should fix at all, because there might be differences in different languages
11:09:32 [heycam]
ED: maybe even which type of exception is thrown
11:09:50 [heycam]
ED: so i'm suggesting to keep what we have
11:10:00 [heycam]
ED: i only made some minor corrections in the errata item
11:10:31 [heycam]
CM: can you summarise?
11:10:56 [heycam]
ED: there are exceptions raised for negative first parameter of getSubStringLength(), or if the number of characters you try to measure is greater than the characters in the node
11:11:13 [heycam]
ED: this will be changed so that if you pass length longer than the string that it will be clipped to the number of characters that are there
11:11:20 [heycam]
ED: this will make it similar to selectSubString()
11:11:26 [ed]
If nchars specifies more characters than are available, then the substring will consist of all characters starting with charnum until the end of the list of characters.
11:11:51 [heycam]
ED: so it won't raise an exception any more if you give a very large value for nchars
11:12:11 [heycam]
ED: still raising exception if you use negative values for the first, and a new exception if you use a negative value for the second
11:12:50 [heycam]
ED: next change is that it wasn't clear when you have characters that can't be separated (surrogate pairs, glyphs that map to multiple characters)
11:12:58 [heycam]
ED: now it says the range is expanded to include those
11:13:06 [heycam]
s/those/the whole glyph/
11:13:29 [heycam]
ED: in selectSubString(), there is the change to raise an exception if the second parameter is negative
11:14:02 [heycam]
ED: and in getSubStringLength(), it raises an exception if you pass in a starting character number that is larger than the number of characters in the node
11:14:56 [heycam]
ED: I have a test case too, linked from the errata item
11:14:56 [MikeSmith]
MikeSmith has joined #svg
11:15:12 [heycam]
ED: it tests everything in getSubStringLength(), and i'm going to add a test for selectSubString() too
11:15:20 [heycam]
ED: so i propose we move this errata item to proposed
11:16:47 [heycam]
CM: UTF-16 codepoints vs characters?
11:17:12 [heycam]
ED: there's one errata for getNumberOfChars() that uses the codepoint language
11:23:34 [heycam]
ISSUE: All of the SVGTextContentElement methods should be referring to UTF-16 codepoints instead of characters, in SVG 1.1
11:23:35 [trackbot]
Created ISSUE-2008 - All of the SVGTextContentElement methods should be referring to UTF-16 codepoints instead of characters, in SVG 1.1 ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2008/edit .
11:25:15 [heycam]
ACTION: Cameron to fix ISSUE-2008 by adding an errata item that adds a paragraph at the start of SVGTextContentElement about it, and change the getNumberOfChars() one back to using the word "characters"
11:25:15 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-2070 - Fix ISSUE-2008 by adding an errata item that adds a paragraph at the start of SVGTextContentElement about it, and change the getNumberOfChars() one back to using the word \"characters\" [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-06-26].
11:25:50 [heycam]
RESOLUTION: we move ed's SVGTextContentElement errata item to propose
11:26:17 [heycam]
trackbot, close ACTION-2010
11:26:17 [trackbot]
ACTION-2010 Clarify/errata for text DOM methods in SVG 1.1, specify that unrendered characters don't contribute to the computation; remove exceptions of getSubStringLength; clarify about unseparable characters closed
11:26:30 [heycam]
trackbot, you rule
11:26:30 [trackbot]
Sorry, heycam, I don't understand 'trackbot, you rule'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
11:27:12 [heycam]
ED: publishing the errata?
11:27:34 [heycam]
CM: how about after i do my one
11:28:14 [heycam]
Topic: SVG in HTML
11:28:37 [heycam]
DS: some initial discussion on #html-wg, a few substantive comments
11:28:55 [heycam]
DS: there are two separate proposals, which wasn't so clear
11:29:08 [heycam]
DS: there are some jargon terms in there that aren't defined clearly enough
11:29:26 [heycam]
DS: some confusion about where something in handled (in the parser, tokenizer, whereever)
11:29:44 [heycam]
DS: so we'll have to work on it
11:29:48 [heycam]
AG: it is a draft, after all
11:30:53 [heycam]
DS: there were some comments saying that tony's proposal wouldn't achieve some of the things we were hoping for (e.g. attribute quoting, well-formedness)
11:31:07 [heycam]
DS: and a comment about where it breaks out from the content
11:31:12 [heycam]
DS: so those are the things we'll have to tighten up
11:31:36 [heycam]
ED: so that's not in CVS yet?
11:31:51 [heycam]
DS: maybe i'll make a separate directory for proposals
11:33:13 [heycam]
ED: so we should go through the proposal offline
11:33:57 [heycam]
Topic: Script executing under progressive rendering
11:34:17 [heycam]
http://www.w3.org/mid/20080616054241.GB29149@arc.mcc.id.au
11:34:35 [ed]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0133.html
11:42:23 [heycam]
CM: blah blah <script> order of execution...
11:42:38 [heycam]
(we decide that the important point is that <script> elements execute in document order)
11:42:55 [heycam]
(modulo insertion of new <script> elements into the document)
11:43:11 [heycam]
CM: so i'll propose some text for that as part of my ACTION-2063
11:43:34 [heycam]
Topic: Behaviour of SVGLengthList.replaceItem()
11:43:35 [ed]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0141.html
11:45:08 [heycam]
CM: tested some implementations, none are the same
11:45:15 [heycam]
ED: maybe we can ask the svg community
11:46:41 [heycam]
I think the index is probably the index of the item to be replaced before
11:46:41 [heycam]
the new item has been removed from its current list.
11:46:41 [heycam]
-- Jeff Schiller
11:48:36 [heycam]
ED: i'm happy either way, but would like to choose the more intuitive one
11:48:38 [heycam]
CM: sounds good to me
11:49:02 [heycam]
AG: somebody should reply to jeff saying we decided that way
11:50:03 [heycam]
ACTION: Erik to errata replaceItem() to make the index be before the removal of the argument item in the list, and to reply to jeff on www-svg
11:50:03 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-2071 - Errata replaceItem() to make the index be before the removal of the argument item in the list, and to reply to jeff on www-svg [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-06-26].
11:51:00 [heycam]
Topic: Issues and actions
11:51:02 [ed]
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/2
11:51:50 [heycam]
ED: two open issues, no actions assigned
11:52:49 [heycam]
trackbot, ISSUE-2003?
11:52:49 [trackbot]
Sorry, heycam, I don't understand 'trackbot, ISSUE-2003?'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
11:53:12 [heycam]
ISSUE-2003?
11:53:12 [trackbot]
ISSUE-2003 -- Resolving IRIs for Resource Documents -- RAISED
11:53:12 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2003
11:56:16 [heycam]
ACTION: Erik to check what Opera does with ISSUE-2003
11:56:17 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-2072 - Check what Opera does with ISSUE-2003 [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-06-26].
11:57:30 [heycam]
Topic: ISSUE-2004
11:58:23 [heycam]
CM: how about making the udom default to throwing an exception when NaN or Infinity is passed in to a float parameter?
11:58:31 [heycam]
CM: and then override that in a method description if we need to
11:59:19 [heycam]
CM: maybe not throwing for setFloatTrait()? because traits we define later might use those values?
11:59:23 [heycam]
ED: i think we throw for that method already
11:59:33 [ed]
DOMExceptionTYPE_MISMATCH_ERR: Raised if the requested trait's value cannot be specified as a numeric float (e.g. NaN).
11:59:37 [ed]
setFloatTrait
11:59:45 [ed]
(that's the CR version of the spec)
12:00:21 [heycam]
CM: is Infinity numeric? :)
12:01:44 [heycam]
ACTION: Cameron to investigate existing uses of float in the 1.2T IDL for ISSUE-2004, to see which ones should throw and which shouldn't
12:01:44 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-2073 - Investigate existing uses of float in the 1.2T IDL for ISSUE-2004, to see which ones should throw and which shouldn't [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-06-26].
12:03:17 [heycam]
(we all agree to be more responsive on www-svg :))
12:03:48 [Zakim]
-ed
12:03:49 [Zakim]
-Doug_Schepers
12:03:50 [Zakim]
-heycam
12:03:56 [Zakim]
-anthony
12:03:57 [heycam]
RRSAgent, list participants
12:03:57 [RRSAgent]
I'm logging. I don't understand 'list participants', heycam. Try /msg RRSAgent help
12:03:58 [Zakim]
GA_SVGWG()6:30AM has ended
12:04:00 [Zakim]
Attendees were Doug_Schepers, anthony, ed, heycam
12:04:05 [heycam]
Zakim, list participants
12:04:12 [Zakim]
sorry, heycam, I don't know what conference this is
12:04:21 [heycam]
RRSAgent, make minutes
12:04:21 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/19-svg-minutes.html heycam