IRC log of webapps on 2008-06-12
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 00:15:16 [aroben_]
- aroben_ has joined #webapps
- 00:16:10 [aroben]
- aroben has joined #webapps
- 00:39:29 [MikeSmith]
- MikeSmith has joined #webapps
- 00:52:43 [smaug]
- smaug has joined #webapps
- 03:26:07 [smaug_]
- smaug_ has joined #webapps
- 03:46:08 [Hixie]
- Hixie has joined #webapps
- 03:51:35 [Hixie]
- any chance we can merge http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/ into http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/ ?
- 03:59:11 [shepazu]
- yes, I think that's possible
- 03:59:28 [shepazu]
- question is, what to also do with the WAF tracker?
- 03:59:57 [shepazu]
- do we want to move them over with exactly the same issue/action numbers, or is the content alone enough?
- 04:21:09 [Hixie]
- no idea
- 07:35:36 [heycam]
- heycam has joined #webapps
- 07:57:36 [arve]
- arve has joined #webapps
- 08:04:34 [Lachy]
- Lachy has joined #webapps
- 08:17:11 [Lachy]
- Lachy has joined #webapps
- 08:20:29 [tlr]
- tlr has joined #webapps
- 08:58:19 [Lachy]
- Lachy has joined #webapps
- 09:55:31 [Lachy]
- Lachy has joined #webapps
- 10:26:39 [ArtB]
- ArtB has joined #webapps
- 11:00:16 [ArtB]
- ArtB has changed the topic to: Widgets Voice Conference starts at 13:00 Paris time on June 12
- 11:00:29 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #webapps
- 11:00:59 [ArtB]
- zakim, this will be webapps
- 11:00:59 [Zakim]
- ok, ArtB; I see IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM scheduled to start now
- 11:01:23 [ArtB]
- hmmm; Marcos, where art thou?
- 11:03:01 [Zakim]
- IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM has now started
- 11:03:08 [marcos_]
- marcos_ has joined #webapps
- 11:03:10 [Zakim]
- + +39.011.228.aaaa
- 11:03:10 [Zakim]
- +??P8
- 11:03:34 [Zakim]
- +Art_Barstow
- 11:03:51 [arve]
- having trouble calling in
- 11:03:51 [ArtB]
- zakim, aaaa is Marcos
- 11:03:51 [Zakim]
- +Marcos; got it
- 11:04:01 [Zakim]
- +Arve
- 11:04:02 [ArtB]
- zakim, ??P8 is Claudio
- 11:04:02 [Zakim]
- +Claudio; got it
- 11:05:20 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 11:05:20 [RRSAgent]
- I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/11-webapps-actions.rdf :
- 11:05:20 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: shepazu Continue discussion on list regarding event handler attributes and should they be specified in DOM L3 Events [1]
- 11:05:20 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/11-webapps-irc#T19-04-47
- 11:05:20 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Travis write the list about Error vs DOMException [2]
- 11:05:20 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/11-webapps-irc#T19-20-39
- 11:05:39 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #webapps
- 11:05:39 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-irc
- 11:05:55 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 11:06:13 [ArtB]
- Present: Art, Arve, Claudio, Marcos
- 11:06:16 [ArtB]
- Chair: Art
- 11:06:20 [ArtB]
- ScribeNick: ArtB
- 11:06:31 [ArtB]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-webapps/2008AprJun/0003.html
- 11:06:37 [ArtB]
- Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference
- 11:06:41 [ArtB]
- Date: 12 June 2008
- 11:07:31 [ArtB]
- Topic: Agenda Review
- 11:07:39 [ArtB]
- AB: any change requests?
- 11:07:41 [ArtB]
- [None]
- 11:07:48 [ArtB]
- Topic: Announcements
- 11:08:07 [ArtB]
- AB: transition to WebApps WG is complete
- 11:08:18 [ArtB]
- MC: I'm glad this finally happened!
- 11:08:40 [ArtB]
- AB: any concerns or issues?
- 11:08:51 [ArtB]
- MC: I'm a bit concerned about the volume of email
- 11:09:04 [ArtB]
- ... perhaps we should split up the specs into different mail lists
- 11:09:39 [ArtB]
- ABe: if you were subscribed to both waf and webapi the change should be zero
- 11:09:53 [ArtB]
- MC: agree but I wasn't subscribed to webapi
- 11:10:05 [ArtB]
- AB: agree with Marcos concern
- 11:10:17 [ArtB]
- ... but would prefer to wait and see
- 11:10:22 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, code?
- 11:10:22 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 9231 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), MikeSmith
- 11:10:31 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 11:10:36 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, IP is me
- 11:10:36 [Zakim]
- sorry, MikeSmith, I do not recognize a party named 'IP'
- 11:10:42 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, IPcaller is me
- 11:10:42 [Zakim]
- +MikeSmith; got it
- 11:10:42 [ArtB]
- Present+ Mike
- 11:11:40 [ArtB]
- MS: I also have the same concern
- 11:11:58 [ArtB]
- ... agree we should take a wait and see for now
- 11:12:12 [ArtB]
- ... an extreme is a list per spec
- 11:12:31 [ArtB]
- ... but that creates a different set of probs
- 11:13:07 [claudio]
- claudio has joined #webapps
- 11:13:31 [ArtB]
- CV: I also agree with the mail list issue
- 11:14:00 [ArtB]
- ... we are especially interested in Widgets and we do not want to see that disrupted
- 11:14:29 [ArtB]
- MS: I can take an action to monitor the lists for one month and then make a recommendation
- 11:14:59 [ArtB]
- ACTION: Smith monitor the webapps mail list for one month and then make a recommendation about the number of lists to use
- 11:14:59 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-3 - Monitor the webapps mail list for one month and then make a recommendation about the number of lists to use [on Michael(tm) Smith - due 2008-06-19].
- 11:16:37 [MikeSmith]
- ACTION-3 due July 12
- 11:16:37 [trackbot]
- ACTION-3 Monitor the webapps mail list for one month and then make a recommendation about the number of lists to use due date now July 12
- 11:16:54 [ArtB]
- AB: make sure everyone joins the new WG
- 11:17:30 [Zakim]
- -Marcos
- 11:17:37 [ArtB]
- MC: what is your status?
- 11:17:53 [ArtB]
- s/MC: what/AB: what/
- 11:18:11 [ArtB]
- MC: I am working with Mike to become an Invited Expert
- 11:18:27 [ArtB]
- AB: I'd be happy to provide input to support this; just let me know
- 11:18:46 [ArtB]
- MS: I don't anticipate any probs
- 11:19:02 [Zakim]
- +Marcos
- 11:19:08 [ArtB]
- Topic: Requirements Last Call
- 11:19:34 [ArtB]
- AB: Marcos would like to discuss the Requirements Last Call
- 11:19:48 [ArtB]
- MC: the document has mostly settled down
- 11:19:52 [ArtB]
- ... few changes recently
- 11:20:04 [ArtB]
- ... we've had plenty of internal review
- 11:20:16 [ArtB]
- ... want to get more Public review
- 11:20:28 [ArtB]
- AB: any comments?
- 11:20:38 [ArtB]
- ABe: I think that would be the right move
- 11:21:10 [ArtB]
- CV: I agree the doc is ready for LC
- 11:21:29 [ArtB]
- MS: I support requesting LC
- 11:22:01 [ArtB]
- AB: I have a few editorial requests but I support moving to LC
- 11:22:51 [ArtB]
- ... first, I want to say I think this document has been an excellent way for us to communicate the scope and what we are trying to do.
- 11:23:15 [ArtB]
- ... the Status of the Doc needs to reflect the change to WebApps WG
- 11:23:39 [ArtB]
- MC: yes, I'll make those changes
- 11:23:47 [marcos_]
- ACTION: Marcos to update the Requirements document to reflect WebApps WG
- 11:23:47 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - Marcos
- 11:23:53 [marcos_]
- ACTION: Caceres to update the Requirements document to reflect WebApps WG
- 11:23:53 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - Caceres
- 11:23:54 [ArtB]
- AB: there is a related change that needs to be made in Section 2
- 11:23:59 [marcos_]
- Ah, not a member yet
- 11:24:01 [marcos_]
- :P
- 11:24:35 [ArtB]
- AB: one question about paragraph #2 in Section 2
- 11:24:53 [ArtB]
- ... can you clarify what is being said
- 11:25:23 [ArtB]
- ... <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/#conformance>
- 11:26:39 [ArtB]
- ArtB has joined #webapps
- 11:27:48 [ArtB]
- MC: this is about an input from some company
- 11:28:15 [ArtB]
- ... for example an input on security model should be based on one or more of the requirements
- 11:29:12 [ArtB]
- AB: I would prefer to delete the second sentence
- 11:29:20 [ArtB]
- AB: any other opinions?
- 11:30:08 [ArtB]
- AB: based on Marcos' description, I can live with this
- 11:30:26 [ArtB]
- MC: OK
- 11:32:27 [ArtB]
- CV: I think this sentence says Widgets can be re-specified but if they are, they should reflect these requirements
- 11:33:11 [ArtB]
- AB: the doc used to say something like "not all of these reqs will necessarily be specified by the W3C". Is this disclaimer still in there?
- 11:33:20 [ArtB]
- MC: yes, by the use of Keywords
- 11:33:54 [ArtB]
- MC: I will add a comment
- 11:34:38 [ArtB]
- CV: regarding the Abstract, we are a bit weak regarding device capabilities
- 11:34:54 [ArtB]
- ... req #29 is the only related requirement
- 11:35:19 [ArtB]
- MC: good point
- 11:35:35 [ArtB]
- AB: what do you think we should do?
- 11:35:43 [ArtB]
- ... or was this more of an observation?
- 11:35:57 [ArtB]
- CV: we could add a pointer to the UWA WG's work
- 11:36:21 [ArtB]
- MC: but we don't want create any device API specs
- 11:37:12 [ArtB]
- AB: does the Rational of req 29 address your concern?
- 11:38:13 [ArtB]
- CV: yes, now that I read the Rational I think that addresses the issue
- 11:38:36 [ArtB]
- MC: and I can remove some of the device-specific use cases/examples from the Abstract
- 11:39:23 [ArtB]
- MC: I prefer to leave the text as is
- 11:40:51 [ArtB]
- ABe: the reality is widgets will have to deal with vendor-specific and device-specifc APIs
- 11:41:01 [ArtB]
- ... but I don't think doing such is in our scope
- 11:41:15 [ArtB]
- ... it could be some abstract bindings would be helpful
- 11:41:47 [ArtB]
- MC: need a generic means to tie into device and vendor specific APIs
- 11:42:31 [ArtB]
- ABe: we could then refer to them as "3rd-party" APIs
- 11:42:47 [ArtB]
- AB: are you going to do a major rework of #29?
- 11:42:50 [ArtB]
- MC: yes
- 11:45:00 [ArtB]
- AB: I would like to give the WG a 1-week review period
- 11:45:26 [ArtB]
- ... if we want to target June 19 as the Decision Day, we would need a revised version within the next day or so
- 11:45:34 [ArtB]
- ... Marcos, is that doable?
- 11:45:36 [ArtB]
- MC: yes
- 11:46:39 [ArtB]
- AB: working assumption: Marcos will make his changes and then notify the WG that we want to make a decsion on June 19 regarding LC so WG members should submit any comments by June 18 at the latest
- 11:46:53 [ArtB]
- AB: any objections?
- 11:47:04 [ArtB]
- [None]
- 11:47:51 [ArtB]
- Topic: User Agent Conformance
- 11:48:02 [ArtB]
- AB: comments from FT's Fabrice
- 11:48:21 [ArtB]
- MC: I've answered that
- 11:48:27 [ArtB]
- Topic: Turin F2F
- 11:49:09 [ArtB]
- CV: I will miss the next couple of calls
- 11:49:17 [ArtB]
- ... all of the arrangements are made
- 11:50:12 [ArtB]
- ... in mid to late July I will send out some hotel info
- 11:50:31 [ArtB]
- AB: the hotel info would be good to get earlier
- 11:50:51 [ArtB]
- ABe: yes, I also would like to get the hotel info earlier
- 11:51:07 [ArtB]
- CV: Turin usually is not that busy in August
- 11:51:56 [ArtB]
- CV: I will try to send something by the end of today
- 11:52:47 [ArtB]
- AB: you have some comments on the format?
- 11:53:06 [ArtB]
- MC: want to be in a position to close issues
- 11:53:37 [ArtB]
- ... so we can be in a position to get to LC in October
- 11:53:53 [ArtB]
- ABe: could be helpful to spit into groups for the editorial type stuff
- 11:54:14 [ArtB]
- MC: in small groups we could also do some implementations
- 11:54:19 [ArtB]
- ... I've found that useful
- 11:54:54 [ArtB]
- AB: agree, but not sure the people that attend the meeting have the right skill set for implementations
- 11:55:26 [ArtB]
- s/the people/that some of the people/
- 11:55:58 [ArtB]
- ABe: we could set up an implemenation area on the W3C's CVS repository
- 11:56:08 [ArtB]
- CV: we are trying to implement something
- 11:56:28 [ArtB]
- ... perhaps we can get those people involved
- 11:56:46 [ArtB]
- MC: we could have some people doing Editorial work and some doing Impl work
- 11:57:09 [ArtB]
- MC: I can do some research on how to most effectively make use of people's time
- 11:57:26 [ArtB]
- ... I thought Hixie's un-conf approach for HTML went well
- 11:57:37 [ArtB]
- ... (at the TPAC in November 2007)
- 11:58:51 [ArtB]
- ACTION: Barstow work with Marcos et al. on the Turin agenda that maximizes the use of people's time
- 11:58:51 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-4 - Work with Marcos et al. on the Turin agenda that maximizes the use of people's time [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-06-19].
- 11:59:25 [Zakim]
- -Art_Barstow
- 11:59:26 [Zakim]
- -Arve
- 11:59:26 [Zakim]
- -Claudio
- 11:59:27 [Zakim]
- -Marcos
- 11:59:34 [Zakim]
- -MikeSmith
- 11:59:35 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 11:59:35 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-minutes.html ArtB
- 11:59:36 [Zakim]
- IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM has ended
- 11:59:37 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +39.011.228.aaaa, Art_Barstow, Marcos, Arve, Claudio, MikeSmith
- 12:01:25 [ArtB]
- AB: Meeting adjourned
- 12:01:31 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 12:01:33 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-minutes.html ArtB
- 12:02:03 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 12:02:03 [RRSAgent]
- I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-actions.rdf :
- 12:02:03 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Smith monitor the webapps mail list for one month and then make a recommendation about the number of lists to use [1]
- 12:02:03 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-irc#T11-14-59
- 12:02:03 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Marcos to update the Requirements document to reflect WebApps WG [2]
- 12:02:03 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-irc#T11-23-47
- 12:02:03 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Caceres to update the Requirements document to reflect WebApps WG [3]
- 12:02:03 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-irc#T11-23-53
- 12:02:03 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Barstow work with Marcos et al. on the Turin agenda that maximizes the use of people's time [4]
- 12:02:03 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-irc#T11-58-51