IRC log of au on 2008-06-02
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 19:54:46 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #au
- 19:54:46 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc
- 19:54:51 [Jan]
- Zakim, this will be AUWG
- 19:54:51 [Zakim]
- ok, Jan; I see WAI_AUWG()3:00PM scheduled to start 54 minutes ago
- 19:54:58 [Jan]
- Meeting: WAI AU
- 19:55:31 [Jan]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0069.html
- 19:56:18 [Jan]
- Regrets: Andrew R., Roberto S., Reed S.
- 19:57:43 [Zakim]
- WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has now started
- 19:58:04 [Zakim]
- +jeanne
- 19:59:30 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 20:00:48 [Zakim]
- +??P10
- 20:01:03 [Jan]
- zakim, ??P10 is really Jan
- 20:01:03 [Zakim]
- +Jan; got it
- 20:01:19 [Zakim]
- +Treviranus
- 20:01:21 [Zakim]
- -Treviranus
- 20:01:25 [jeanne]
- zakim, [IBM] is MichaelS
- 20:01:25 [Zakim]
- +MichaelS; got it
- 20:01:48 [Zakim]
- +Treviranus
- 20:03:14 [Zakim]
- + +1.703.678.aaaa
- 20:03:28 [Jan]
- Chair: Jutta Treviranus
- 20:03:34 [Jan]
- Scribe: Jeanne
- 20:04:27 [Jan]
- zakim, +1.703.678.aaaa is really GPisocky
- 20:04:27 [Zakim]
- +GPisocky; got it
- 20:05:30 [Greg]
- Greg has joined #au
- 20:06:24 [jutta]
- jutta has joined #au
- 20:08:08 [Jan]
- ACTION: All to Send additions/revisions on ATAG2 Implementation
- 20:08:09 [Jan]
- Repository to JR/JS
- 20:09:05 [Zakim]
- + +2
- 20:09:10 [AnnM]
- AnnM has joined #au
- 20:09:12 [jeanne]
- JT: Legislation draft being presented that ATAG Authoring tools required for Accessibility Act Information Standard
- 20:10:40 [jeanne]
- topic + rechartering
- 20:10:49 [jeanne]
- topic: rechartering
- 20:11:17 [Jan]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/draft_auwg_charter_27may08.html
- 20:12:39 [Tim]
- Tim has joined #au
- 20:13:22 [jeanne]
- JS: read from Mike's email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0059.html
- 20:13:40 [jeanne]
- MS:It caught my attention that I didn't know what it was.
- 20:13:58 [jeanne]
- JT: This is a text base criteria, first do this, then that.
- 20:14:21 [jeanne]
- JR: TB has a draft and some material for this.
- 20:14:41 [Tim]
- What is topic (I'm only on IRC today)
- 20:14:46 [jeanne]
- JT: There were many more if then dependencies in ATAG 1. It could be simplified.
- 20:15:25 [jeanne]
- topic is the charter and whether more information on testmaterial is necessary in the charter
- 20:15:31 [Jan]
- zakim, who's making noise?
- 20:15:33 [Tim]
- thanks
- 20:15:42 [Zakim]
- Jan, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: +1.617.324.aaaa (48%), +2 (14%), Jan (18%)
- 20:17:36 [jeanne]
- JT: It gives us greater flexibility in coordinating with other groups.
- 20:18:04 [jeanne]
- RESOLVED: Keep charter wording loosely worded on the Other Deliverables test materials.
- 20:18:33 [jeanne]
- JT: We will also work with EO and collaborate with them in creating an FAQ.
- 20:18:59 [jeanne]
- JR: "Other minor supporting documents, e.g. FAQ, as required."
- 20:19:42 [Tim]
- do we need to be plugged in to the WAI-AGE TF (out of EO)?
- 20:19:50 [jeanne]
- s/documents/documents for ATAG 2.0
- 20:21:02 [jeanne]
- JR: who do we say we have dependency on? With WAI-AGE, we may not have a dependency, but we may want to liaison with them.
- 20:21:39 [Tim]
- Also what about TSDTF (test sample development task force)?
- 20:21:51 [Greg]
- yes
- 20:22:34 [jeanne]
- JS: Do we need to adjust the milestones?
- 20:22:41 [jeanne]
- JR: do it.
- 20:22:56 [jeanne]
- JS: ACTION: Jeanne will adjust the milestones.
- 20:23:46 [jeanne]
- s/milestones./milestones by two months for the charter.
- 20:24:49 [jeanne]
- JT: Getting it done earlier would be wonderful.
- 20:26:03 [jeanne]
- JR: Can we send it to WAI CG and Judy?
- 20:26:33 [Tim]
- I agree
- 20:27:21 [jeanne]
- ACTION: Jeanne will make the agreed edits and send them to Judy.
- 20:27:42 [jeanne]
- s/edits/edits to the charter
- 20:28:47 [jeanne]
- topic: Face2face
- 20:29:04 [jeanne]
- Mike will attend in person
- 20:29:26 [jeanne]
- AnnM needs the hotel details so determine whether she can attend.
- 20:30:00 [jeanne]
- Greg has a 90% chance of being there.
- 20:30:16 [jeanne]
- Tim is teaching a class and will be attending by phone.
- 20:30:30 [jeanne]
- topic: Harmonization with WCAG 2
- 20:31:14 [jeanne]
- JR: this is a better organization of the material.
- 20:31:34 [jeanne]
- JR: Should we suggest it to WCAG?
- 20:31:56 [jeanne]
- AnnM: It's an improvement in my experience.
- 20:32:41 [jeanne]
- JR: Even if WCAG doesn't organize this way, should we still go ahead with this organiation?
- 20:33:00 [jeanne]
- s/organiation/organization
- 20:33:51 [jeanne]
- JR: WCAG is now calling it "Time Based Media". It's not a normative change, just a reordering.
- 20:34:40 [jeanne]
- ACTION: JR follow up with WCAG to determine if they are willing to change their organization of Guideline A.2.2
- 20:35:29 [jeanne]
- JR: We want to use the same terms, except in the places where we call out the differences.
- 20:36:12 [Jan]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#glossary
- 20:36:35 [Jan]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#glossary
- 20:37:18 [jeanne]
- JR: To properly harmonize, we need to use WCAG wording.
- 20:37:43 [jeanne]
- JS: Being close to WCAG is good enough, I don't like the use of Notes.
- 20:38:01 [jeanne]
- JT: If we want to use a different term, we should use a different word.
- 20:38:29 [Tim]
- I think we should use same terminology unless we can't and then we should document why we can't
- 20:38:39 [jeanne]
- ??:Harmonization means that we can propose better wording to them. We are not subordinent to them.
- 20:39:09 [Tim]
- don't disagree with that
- 20:39:24 [jeanne]
- s/??/GP
- 20:40:12 [jeanne]
- MS:We should suggest the better wording to have better usability of the document.
- 20:40:59 [jeanne]
- JT: I think we should assess harmonization on a case by case basis to see where there is a better definition.
- 20:41:52 [jeanne]
- GP: If harmonization means negotiation and discussion, I agree, but not if harmonization means that WCAG dictates what we can say, no.
- 20:42:37 [jeanne]
- ACTION: JS and JR will review the ATAG documents and propose changes to the WCAG editors.
- 20:43:10 [jeanne]
- s/editors/public comments
- 20:43:11 [Jan]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0061.html
- 20:44:25 [jeanne]
- topic: other success criteria harmonization
- 20:44:32 [jeanne]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0061.html
- 20:44:53 [jeanne]
- Success Criteria in WCAG that don't have a 1 to 1 match with ATAG.
- 20:45:13 [jeanne]
- JR: is risk averse to changing normative text when there were no negative public comments.
- 20:45:51 [Zakim]
- -MichaelS
- 20:47:20 [jeanne]
- topic: WCAG2 checkpoints that are not covered in ATAG.
- 20:47:25 [jeanne]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0061.html near the bottom.
- 20:48:02 [jeanne]
- JR: ATAG doesn't cover resize of text, Reading level, images of text.
- 20:48:30 [jeanne]
- JT: But aren't these related to content rather than the tool?
- 20:48:54 [jeanne]
- AM: Is this menu options or chrome, or help text?
- 20:49:10 [jeanne]
- JR: both. Nothing is driven by content being authored.
- 20:51:12 [jeanne]
- JR: We didn't think that it was appropriate to require a tool to lower reading level for a technical audience, but the general poor quality of help systems might indicate that there should be some work here.
- 20:51:34 [jeanne]
- AM: There needs to be a level of explanation of the jargon.
- 20:52:16 [jeanne]
- JR: Can someone take this on? Can someone study whether or not the guidelines being missing is a problem?
- 20:52:36 [jeanne]
- GP: had done an earlier mapping that could be revived.
- 20:53:40 [jeanne]
- ACTION: GP will look at the earlier mapping with WCAG and evaluate if changes need to be made.
- 20:54:07 [Zakim]
- -GPisocky
- 20:54:15 [jeanne]
- Next meeting in two weeks on June 16.
- 20:54:27 [Zakim]
- - +2
- 20:54:36 [Zakim]
- - +1.617.324.aaaa
- 20:54:40 [Zakim]
- -Treviranus
- 20:54:41 [Zakim]
- WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has ended
- 20:54:42 [Zakim]
- Attendees were jeanne, Jan, Treviranus, MichaelS, GPisocky, +2
- 20:54:53 [AnnM]
- AnnM has left #au
- 20:55:02 [jeanne]
- zakim, aaaa is jeanne
- 20:55:02 [Zakim]
- sorry, jeanne, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa'
- 20:57:23 [jeanne]
- present+ AnnM
- 20:57:43 [jeanne]
- present+ Tim
- 20:57:49 [jeanne]
- present?
- 20:58:01 [jeanne]
- Zakim, present?
- 20:58:01 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, jeanne.
- 20:58:37 [jeanne]
- zakim, part
- 20:58:37 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #au
- 20:59:02 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 20:59:02 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-minutes.html jeanne
- 21:00:06 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, set logs public
- 21:01:40 [jeanne]
- s/topic + rechartering/
- 21:01:50 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 21:01:50 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-minutes.html jeanne
- 21:03:00 [jeanne]
- s/testmaterial/test material
- 21:04:04 [jeanne]
- s/details so determine/details to determine
- 21:08:40 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 21:08:40 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-minutes.html jeanne
- 21:09:17 [jeanne]
- s/present?/
- 21:09:27 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 21:09:27 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-minutes.html jeanne
- 21:21:09 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, part
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-actions.rdf :
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: All to Send additions/revisions on ATAG2 Implementation [1]
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc#T20-08-08
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Jeanne will make the agreed edits and send them to Judy. [2]
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc#T20-27-21
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: JR follow up with WCAG to determine if they are willing to change their organization of Guideline A.2.2 [3]
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc#T20-34-40
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: JS and JR will review the ATAG documents and propose changes to the WCAG editors. [4]
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc#T20-42-37
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: GP will look at the earlier mapping with WCAG and evaluate if changes need to be made. [5]
- 21:21:09 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc#T20-53-40