19:54:46 RRSAgent has joined #au 19:54:46 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc 19:54:51 Zakim, this will be AUWG 19:54:51 ok, Jan; I see WAI_AUWG()3:00PM scheduled to start 54 minutes ago 19:54:58 Meeting: WAI AU 19:55:31 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0069.html 19:56:18 Regrets: Andrew R., Roberto S., Reed S. 19:57:43 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has now started 19:58:04 +jeanne 19:59:30 +[IBM] 20:00:48 +??P10 20:01:03 zakim, ??P10 is really Jan 20:01:03 +Jan; got it 20:01:19 +Treviranus 20:01:21 -Treviranus 20:01:25 zakim, [IBM] is MichaelS 20:01:25 +MichaelS; got it 20:01:48 +Treviranus 20:03:14 + +1.703.678.aaaa 20:03:28 Chair: Jutta Treviranus 20:03:34 Scribe: Jeanne 20:04:27 zakim, +1.703.678.aaaa is really GPisocky 20:04:27 +GPisocky; got it 20:05:30 Greg has joined #au 20:06:24 jutta has joined #au 20:08:08 ACTION: All to Send additions/revisions on ATAG2 Implementation 20:08:09 Repository to JR/JS 20:09:05 + +2 20:09:10 AnnM has joined #au 20:09:12 JT: Legislation draft being presented that ATAG Authoring tools required for Accessibility Act Information Standard 20:10:40 topic + rechartering 20:10:49 topic: rechartering 20:11:17 http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/draft_auwg_charter_27may08.html 20:12:39 Tim has joined #au 20:13:22 JS: read from Mike's email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0059.html 20:13:40 MS:It caught my attention that I didn't know what it was. 20:13:58 JT: This is a text base criteria, first do this, then that. 20:14:21 JR: TB has a draft and some material for this. 20:14:41 What is topic (I'm only on IRC today) 20:14:46 JT: There were many more if then dependencies in ATAG 1. It could be simplified. 20:15:25 topic is the charter and whether more information on testmaterial is necessary in the charter 20:15:31 zakim, who's making noise? 20:15:33 thanks 20:15:42 Jan, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: +1.617.324.aaaa (48%), +2 (14%), Jan (18%) 20:17:36 JT: It gives us greater flexibility in coordinating with other groups. 20:18:04 RESOLVED: Keep charter wording loosely worded on the Other Deliverables test materials. 20:18:33 JT: We will also work with EO and collaborate with them in creating an FAQ. 20:18:59 JR: "Other minor supporting documents, e.g. FAQ, as required." 20:19:42 do we need to be plugged in to the WAI-AGE TF (out of EO)? 20:19:50 s/documents/documents for ATAG 2.0 20:21:02 JR: who do we say we have dependency on? With WAI-AGE, we may not have a dependency, but we may want to liaison with them. 20:21:39 Also what about TSDTF (test sample development task force)? 20:21:51 yes 20:22:34 JS: Do we need to adjust the milestones? 20:22:41 JR: do it. 20:22:56 JS: ACTION: Jeanne will adjust the milestones. 20:23:46 s/milestones./milestones by two months for the charter. 20:24:49 JT: Getting it done earlier would be wonderful. 20:26:03 JR: Can we send it to WAI CG and Judy? 20:26:33 I agree 20:27:21 ACTION: Jeanne will make the agreed edits and send them to Judy. 20:27:42 s/edits/edits to the charter 20:28:47 topic: Face2face 20:29:04 Mike will attend in person 20:29:26 AnnM needs the hotel details so determine whether she can attend. 20:30:00 Greg has a 90% chance of being there. 20:30:16 Tim is teaching a class and will be attending by phone. 20:30:30 topic: Harmonization with WCAG 2 20:31:14 JR: this is a better organization of the material. 20:31:34 JR: Should we suggest it to WCAG? 20:31:56 AnnM: It's an improvement in my experience. 20:32:41 JR: Even if WCAG doesn't organize this way, should we still go ahead with this organiation? 20:33:00 s/organiation/organization 20:33:51 JR: WCAG is now calling it "Time Based Media". It's not a normative change, just a reordering. 20:34:40 ACTION: JR follow up with WCAG to determine if they are willing to change their organization of Guideline A.2.2 20:35:29 JR: We want to use the same terms, except in the places where we call out the differences. 20:36:12 http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#glossary 20:36:35 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#glossary 20:37:18 JR: To properly harmonize, we need to use WCAG wording. 20:37:43 JS: Being close to WCAG is good enough, I don't like the use of Notes. 20:38:01 JT: If we want to use a different term, we should use a different word. 20:38:29 I think we should use same terminology unless we can't and then we should document why we can't 20:38:39 ??:Harmonization means that we can propose better wording to them. We are not subordinent to them. 20:39:09 don't disagree with that 20:39:24 s/??/GP 20:40:12 MS:We should suggest the better wording to have better usability of the document. 20:40:59 JT: I think we should assess harmonization on a case by case basis to see where there is a better definition. 20:41:52 GP: If harmonization means negotiation and discussion, I agree, but not if harmonization means that WCAG dictates what we can say, no. 20:42:37 ACTION: JS and JR will review the ATAG documents and propose changes to the WCAG editors. 20:43:10 s/editors/public comments 20:43:11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0061.html 20:44:25 topic: other success criteria harmonization 20:44:32 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0061.html 20:44:53 Success Criteria in WCAG that don't have a 1 to 1 match with ATAG. 20:45:13 JR: is risk averse to changing normative text when there were no negative public comments. 20:45:51 -MichaelS 20:47:20 topic: WCAG2 checkpoints that are not covered in ATAG. 20:47:25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0061.html near the bottom. 20:48:02 JR: ATAG doesn't cover resize of text, Reading level, images of text. 20:48:30 JT: But aren't these related to content rather than the tool? 20:48:54 AM: Is this menu options or chrome, or help text? 20:49:10 JR: both. Nothing is driven by content being authored. 20:51:12 JR: We didn't think that it was appropriate to require a tool to lower reading level for a technical audience, but the general poor quality of help systems might indicate that there should be some work here. 20:51:34 AM: There needs to be a level of explanation of the jargon. 20:52:16 JR: Can someone take this on? Can someone study whether or not the guidelines being missing is a problem? 20:52:36 GP: had done an earlier mapping that could be revived. 20:53:40 ACTION: GP will look at the earlier mapping with WCAG and evaluate if changes need to be made. 20:54:07 -GPisocky 20:54:15 Next meeting in two weeks on June 16. 20:54:27 - +2 20:54:36 - +1.617.324.aaaa 20:54:40 -Treviranus 20:54:41 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has ended 20:54:42 Attendees were jeanne, Jan, Treviranus, MichaelS, GPisocky, +2 20:54:53 AnnM has left #au 20:55:02 zakim, aaaa is jeanne 20:55:02 sorry, jeanne, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa' 20:57:23 present+ AnnM 20:57:43 present+ Tim 20:57:49 present? 20:58:01 Zakim, present? 20:58:01 I don't understand your question, jeanne. 20:58:37 zakim, part 20:58:37 Zakim has left #au 20:59:02 rrsagent, draft minutes 20:59:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-minutes.html jeanne 21:00:06 rrsagent, set logs public 21:01:40 s/topic + rechartering/ 21:01:50 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:01:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-minutes.html jeanne 21:03:00 s/testmaterial/test material 21:04:04 s/details so determine/details to determine 21:08:40 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:08:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-minutes.html jeanne 21:09:17 s/present?/ 21:09:27 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:09:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-minutes.html jeanne 21:21:09 rrsagent, part 21:21:09 I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-actions.rdf : 21:21:09 ACTION: All to Send additions/revisions on ATAG2 Implementation [1] 21:21:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc#T20-08-08 21:21:09 ACTION: Jeanne will make the agreed edits and send them to Judy. [2] 21:21:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc#T20-27-21 21:21:09 ACTION: JR follow up with WCAG to determine if they are willing to change their organization of Guideline A.2.2 [3] 21:21:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc#T20-34-40 21:21:09 ACTION: JS and JR will review the ATAG documents and propose changes to the WCAG editors. [4] 21:21:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc#T20-42-37 21:21:09 ACTION: GP will look at the earlier mapping with WCAG and evaluate if changes need to be made. [5] 21:21:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/02-au-irc#T20-53-40