12:31:45 RRSAgent has joined #svg 12:31:45 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/05/29-svg-irc 12:31:47 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:31:47 Zakim has joined #svg 12:31:49 Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG 12:31:49 ok, trackbot-ng; I see GA_SVGWG()8:30AM scheduled to start now 12:31:50 Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference 12:31:50 Date: 29 May 2008 12:32:21 GA_SVGWG()8:30AM has now started 12:32:28 +Andrew_Emmons 12:33:35 +??P4 12:33:50 zakim, ??4 is me 12:33:50 sorry, anthony, I do not recognize a party named '??4' 12:34:37 ed has joined #svg 12:35:13 Zakim, call doug-work 12:35:13 ok, shepazu; the call is being made 12:35:15 +Doug 12:35:17 +m_schnei 12:35:57 Zakim, +??P4 is anthony 12:35:57 sorry, shepazu, I do not recognize a party named '+??P4' 12:36:19 zakim, ??P4 is me 12:36:19 +anthony; got it 12:36:22 Zakim, m_schnei is me 12:36:22 +ed; got it 12:37:43 ChrisL has joined #svg 12:38:21 -Doug 12:39:44 ChrisL has changed the topic to: Shifty Vendor-specific Glyphs 12:39:50 zakim, who is here? 12:39:50 On the phone I see Andrew_Emmons, anthony, ed 12:39:51 On IRC I see ChrisL, ed, Zakim, RRSAgent, aemmons, zlatinski, heycam, ed_, shepazu, MikeSmith, anthony, trackbot-ng 12:41:17 + +1.214.557.aaaa 12:41:37 +ChrisL 12:42:06 zakim, +1.214 is zlatinski 12:42:06 +zlatinski; got it 12:43:02 -Andrew_Emmons 12:43:16 scribe: Erik 12:43:20 scribeNick: ed 12:43:27 Chair: AE 12:43:34 I answered a couple of Kalles font questions 12:43:41 +Andrew_Emmons 12:43:44 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008May/0053.html 12:43:52 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008May/0055.html 12:44:15 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0068.html 12:44:27 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0068.html 12:44:46 Topic: Errors in approved tests 12:44:51 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0065.html 12:45:14 Zakim, call doug-work 12:45:14 ok, shepazu; the call is being made 12:45:16 +Doug 12:45:42 ED: so these tests are invalid as I see it, how do we proceed? 12:45:56 CL: mark them as non-approved, and take them out for this release 12:46:13 ...Kalle also writes that there are additional tests that are invalid 12:46:25 ...some of the converted 1.1 tests 12:46:48 AE: we'd have to reprocess the testsuite after this, right AG? 12:47:00 AG: yes, but it's all ready, just run some scripts 12:47:07 -Doug 12:47:33 AE: AG will you mark tests as non-approved, and re-run the scripts? 12:47:37 AG: sure 12:48:00 ...which ones should I unapprove? 12:48:15 CL: fonts-gyph-03 is ok 12:48:28 ...text-intro-03 I'll fix that now 12:48:45 AE: ok, so that will be fixed now before we do the publication 12:50:07 AG: ok, will have testsuite ready for publication on tuesday next week 12:51:02 CL: the process of publishing is not that difficult, we just need to decide to do it 12:51:20 AE: so let's do the publication on tuesday next week 12:52:26 ACTION: anthony to send an email out asking for tests to un-approve and to regenerate the test suite based on the feedback 12:52:26 Created ACTION-2044 - Send an email out asking for tests to un-approve and to regenerate the test suite based on the feedback [on Anthony Grasso - due 2008-06-05]. 12:53:39 RESOLUTION: we will publish the 1.2T testsuite on wednesday June 4, all pending changes need to be in before tuesday 12:54:21 Topic: public cvs transition 12:54:41 AE: status update? 12:55:17 ...doug was trying to get the repository added, but we didn't assign anyone to move stuff over 12:55:26 ...is that something only the staff contact can do? 12:55:30 aemmons_ has joined #svg 12:55:37 CL: everyone in the group needs cvs access 12:55:47 ...so that we can all read and write to it 12:56:07 AE: once that's in place anyone can do that 12:56:25 CL: yes, but we need to be careful with revision numbers (especially on the testsuite) 12:56:39 AE: and the history will be lost 12:56:44 CL: yes 12:57:05 ...the 1.2T spec, 1.2 specs and 1.1 errata should be moved 12:57:09 need to talk to systems team to ensure all wg members have read write cvs access 12:57:16 AE: who wants to do that? 12:57:19 CL: i can do that 12:57:41 AE: just needs to be coordinated so that we don't check into the old cvs-space 12:57:56 ...decide on a time, or send an email about it? 12:58:01 CL: will send email 12:59:41 ACTION: CL to move the 1.2T spec, 1.2 modules, 1.1 errata to the new public cvs-space 12:59:41 Created ACTION-2045 - Move the 1.2T spec, 1.2 modules, 1.1 errata to the new public cvs-space [on Chris Lilley - due 2008-06-05]. 13:00:14 Topic: the open edits action review 13:00:17 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0064.html 13:00:35 AE: I'll start sending out weekly updates on edits, to make sure that actions are kept at a minimal level 13:00:47 ...since the spec was changed after tests were made 13:01:16 Topic: animate-elem-224 13:01:22 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0063.html 13:02:05 AE: this is in response to our review comments (from the F2F) about making a simpler test 13:02:27 ...just wanted to respond, the tests are complex and that makes it take longer to review them 13:03:46 TZ: it tests many things at once, it was difficult to verify it 13:04:08 AE: yes, there are a few tests like it 13:04:16 Zakim, call doug-work 13:04:16 ok, shepazu; the call is being made 13:04:20 +Doug 13:04:28 ...is it worth trying to make the tests simpler? 13:06:01 CL: he's synthesizing a quadratic curve 13:06:10 ...suggest putting it out 13:06:24 ...i'm worried if it requires particular precision 13:06:40 AE: the expected result is way different from what's actually happening 13:06:51 TZ: it's also made more complex because of the multiple animations 13:07:40 ...i'm going to let the implementors judge if it's easy enough 13:07:51 ...and that it's testable 13:08:08 AE: because it's a complex test we'd have to debug it over the course of several days 13:08:14 ...it's a resource issue 13:08:33 TZ: is it just this test, or are the others that players don't pass? 13:08:41 AE: there are others 13:09:19 TZ: i could take a look at those tests in house and see if we can verify them 13:09:50 ...I'm going to ask the developers to verify the correctness of the tests 13:10:05 CL: this particular ones can't be simplified 13:10:20 ...he's correct that you can't simplify it if you want to have a curve 13:10:52 ...he's testing two combined animations on one attribute 13:11:03 ...otherwise it would just be animated on a line 13:11:22 ...since it's a quadratic curve and svg has quadratic curves he can show the correct trajectory 13:11:37 ...think the test is correct 13:12:12 AE: I can email the group with the list of DOH tests that are still left to review 13:12:21 CL: right, but this one is fairly simple still 13:13:36 ACTION: TZ to review the 1.2T DOH tests that are still unreviewed (AE will send a list of the tests to public-svg-wg) 13:13:36 Sorry, couldn't find user - TZ 13:13:53 ACTION: atanas to review the 1.2T DOH tests that are still unreviewed (AE will send a list of the tests to public-svg-wg) 13:13:53 Created ACTION-2046 - Review the 1.2T DOH tests that are still unreviewed (AE will send a list of the tests to public-svg-wg) [on Atanas (Tony) Zlatinski - due 2008-06-05]. 13:14:28 ACTION: AE to email DOH to say that we're doing additional review on his tests 13:14:28 Created ACTION-2047 - Email DOH to say that we're doing additional review on his tests [on Andrew Emmons - due 2008-06-05]. 13:14:43 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008May/0047.html 13:14:49 Topic: unanswered questions on www-svg 13:15:17 AE: some of these have been discussed 13:15:35 CL: I've responded to the first two 13:15:42 AE: no spec changes? 13:15:49 CL: not in svg, but in css 13:16:09 clarifications, not conformance changes 13:16:11 AE: for the third one, cameron have already had some feedback but there's been no official response 13:16:22 CL: I'm halfway through that one 13:16:31 AE: ok, the last one then 13:16:58 CL: he's correct 13:17:29 ...the spec says that xml:space applies to text block elements, which is text and textarea only 13:17:35 ...the test puts in on tspan 13:17:42 ...which should be possible 13:17:49 ...but we need to edit the spec 13:18:04 ...just going to check the current spec 13:18:18 zakim, who is noisy? 13:18:29 ChrisL, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: anthony (25%), Doug (15%) 13:19:24 CL: it refers to text element content 13:19:48 ...need to say that xml:space also applies to children of text element content 13:20:00 ...we need to errata 1.1 and change 1.2T 13:20:32 DS: I started to add a definition for text content child elements, since you may have a title for example 13:20:37 ...or an anchor tag 13:22:48 ACTION: CL to add the child definition of text content element to cover the xml:space issue and add an errata 1.1 item, and fix the 1.2T spec, and reply to kalle 13:22:48 Created ACTION-2048 - Add the child definition of text content element to cover the xml:space issue and add an errata 1.1 item, and fix the 1.2T spec, and reply to kalle [on Chris Lilley - due 2008-06-05]. 13:23:14 q+ 13:23:19 AE: do we need to track the list better, and make sure it's on the agenda each week? 13:23:43 CL: yes, and reply to each message quickly with links to the public minutes 13:23:59 AE: yes 13:24:02 its the same text in the repository version 13:24:03 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/repository/spec/mobile/1.2/1.2NG/publish/intro.html#TermTextContentBlockElement 13:24:13 DS: using tracker would be useful, many things falls through the cracks 13:25:04 ...in trying to answer to questions, we should still prioritize spec work, we should set aside about 30 mins each telcon for that 13:25:23 AE: do you suggest putting things in the issue tracker as soon as they come in? 13:25:45 CL: the new tracker can create agendas from the open issues and actions 13:25:58 ...based on due dates too 13:26:21 AE: the public can't add issues though? 13:26:25 CL: right 13:26:30 ...but they can read it 13:26:45 DS: better than the bugtracker 13:26:58 ...having two tracking systems is a bad idea 13:27:33 AE: right, so just paying attention to the www-svg list and adding them to the issue tracker would be a good idea 13:27:36 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0061.html 13:27:37 Topic: XHR review 13:27:49 AE,CL: haven't had time to review 13:28:04 DS: have read it, has alot of dependencies on HTML5 13:28:43 ...have asked for something saying that the host language defines somethings 13:29:26 ...there are definitions of terms that are defined in HTML5 13:29:50 ...the content-type, if you have an XML type do this, otherwise refer to HTML5 13:30:00 ...need to read through it 13:30:32 ...reversing the dependency chain would be an option 13:30:46 AE: so svg couldn't reference this, since it has HTML5 dependencies 13:31:01 DS: it wouldn't be neat, but I don't agree with your statement 13:31:13 ...it has provisions for processing XML 13:31:20 ...it's not exclusive to HTML5 13:32:56 AE: what's the due date? 13:33:10 ED: June 2 13:34:42 rrsagent, here 13:34:42 See http://www.w3.org/2008/05/29-svg-irc#T13-34-42 13:34:49 rrsagent, make minutes 13:34:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/29-svg-minutes.html ChrisL 13:35:10 rrsagent, make logs public 13:35:12 rrsagent, make minutes 13:35:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/29-svg-minutes.html ChrisL 13:35:20 DS: it's unlikely the dependencies will change unless defined elsewhere 13:38:57 AE: if we want to have a formal review we need to get it done today 13:39:03 s/today/soon/ 13:39:35 AE: so, the dependencies on HTML5 13:39:51 DS: right, but it's small parts of it still 13:40:08 TZ: is it possible to do our own interface? 13:40:37 DS: we've done that already, but we will try to use XHR in the future 13:40:45 ...that's the preference 13:41:12 AE: in order to get a review we need reviews to the list and to compile the list of comments 13:41:21 -ChrisL 13:41:38 i was dropped from the call, redialing 13:41:38 DS: I'll review it, ed and heycam should do it too 13:41:45 ...we could ask for an extension 13:42:24 +ChrisL 13:42:52 ...will do that 13:43:39 CL: right, so we can do that and still try to get review comments in order 13:44:37 ACTION: heycam to review the XHR spec and send to public-svg-wg 13:44:37 Sorry, couldn't find user - heycam 13:44:51 ACTION: cameron to review the XHR spec and send to public-svg-wg 13:44:51 Created ACTION-2049 - Review the XHR spec and send to public-svg-wg [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-06-05]. 13:45:24 ACTION: DS to review the XHR spec and send comments to public-svg-wg 13:45:24 Created ACTION-2050 - Review the XHR spec and send comments to public-svg-wg [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-06-05]. 13:45:36 ACTION: ED to review the XHR spec and send comments to public-svg-wg 13:45:36 Created ACTION-2051 - Review the XHR spec and send comments to public-svg-wg [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-06-05]. 13:47:28 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Nuremburg_F2F_2008 13:48:03 Topic: SVG WG F2F 13:48:39 ED: can we confirm these are the correct dates? 13:49:03 CL: if we have a testfest before then we also need to decide those dates 13:50:56 ACTION: to respond to alexander adams about the SVG WG F2F nuremberg dates, and get information for the wiki 13:50:56 Sorry, couldn't find user - to 13:51:07 ACTION: ED to respond to alexander adams about the SVG WG F2F nuremberg dates, and get information for the wiki 13:51:07 Created ACTION-2052 - Respond to alexander adams about the SVG WG F2F nuremberg dates, and get information for the wiki [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-06-05]. 13:51:17 Topic: testfest 13:51:30 AE: not sure if I can travel for personal reasons 13:51:52 CL: not a problem, w3c staff can run the tests if the implementation is available 13:53:06 AE: so we need to pick a date and location 13:54:01 CL: if we have it sooner we'll get results quicker, but later if we want better results 13:54:12 ...thinking july perhaps, in good time before the svg open? 13:54:59 AE: so a virtual testfest is perhaps an idea, so that we don't all have to be present at some location 13:55:53 CL: if people have travelled somewhere, you get the attention of everyone, and can ask anyone for running paricular tests 13:56:12 AG: we could also do it right before the nuremberg f2f 13:56:47 AE: how many more testfests do we need you think? 13:56:57 ...it's resource intensive 13:57:10 ...we could take time from the f2f to do it 13:57:33 DS: if we're having a testfest in raleigh, i'd have to get somewhere for us to meet 13:58:27 AE: maybe not decide now, but we should try to nail this down for next week 13:59:06 Topic: telcon times 13:59:16 DS: this time doesn't work well for heycam 13:59:50 ...don't want to lose him from the team 13:59:59 ...especially given the constraints stuff 14:00:28 ...is it possible to have telcons at different times? 14:00:41 ED,CL: yes, no problem 14:01:33 CL: moving it later wouldn't make it worse for him, since he can't do this time either 14:01:47 DS: if we moved it back to the original time he could make it 14:01:56 ...we moved it because of TZ 14:02:08 ...we could have one late and one early call 14:02:19 ...if we can't find a suitable time for everyone 14:03:19 AE: so we would fluctuate between heycam and slim 14:04:17 RESOLUTION: for tuesdays, let's do the new time, thursdays let's do the old time 14:04:25 -Andrew_Emmons 14:04:27 -ed 14:04:29 -ChrisL 14:04:31 -zlatinski 14:04:31 -anthony 14:04:41 -Doug 14:04:42 GA_SVGWG()8:30AM has ended 14:04:45 Attendees were Andrew_Emmons, Doug, anthony, ed, +1.214.557.aaaa, ChrisL, zlatinski 14:04:46 zakim, bye 14:04:46 Zakim has left #svg 14:04:51 rrsagent, make minutes 14:04:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/29-svg-minutes.html ed 15:32:33 billyjack has joined #svg 15:33:53 Action: shepazu to test trackbot-ng 15:33:53 Sorry, couldn't find user - shepazu 15:34:52 trackbot-ng, restart 15:35:01 trackbot-ng, reboot 15:36:06 trackbot-ng, reload 15:36:42 trackbot-ng, status? 15:37:03 shepazu: seems you = "Doug" 15:37:11 right 15:37:27 Action: shepazu to test trackbot-ng's nicknames 15:37:27 Sorry, couldn't find user - shepazu 15:37:56 but I set up a bunch of aliases for various people... 15:38:18 shepazu: trackbot-ng appears to be confused 15:38:27 e.g., not responding to reload 15:38:30 indeed. 15:38:51 I seem to remember this hampning before 15:39:05 but don't remember what the resolution was 15:40:13 800 x 600, since it's for the Web 15:40:30 sorry, the "Web platform" 15:41:30 trackbot-ng, init 16:04:20 the "open platform" 16:04:29 the "stack" .. of crap 17:14:22 s-mon has joined #svg 17:14:41 trackbot-ng, status 17:15:27 Action: shepazu to test trackbot-ng's nicknames 17:15:27 Sorry, couldn't find user - shepazu 17:15:36 ACTION: cheese - test - due 2008.05.30 17:15:36 Sorry, couldn't find user - cheese 17:15:38 see, it should know me 17:15:43 and cheese 17:15:57 hmm. 17:16:01 let me see... 17:16:35 let me just test this... 17:16:45 trackbot-ng, init 17:16:54 i want to see if it does anything. 17:17:05 yup 17:17:22 btw, can we rename it "trackbot"? 17:17:31 this can be really slow as it parses the config. 17:17:37 can take several minutes. 17:17:50 are there any instances of "trackbot" still running? 17:18:03 this is a bottom feeder instance, as it is way down the config. 17:18:19 not sure at this sec. 17:18:38 this was one of the very last to be rev'd. 17:19:28 almost 3 minutes. 17:20:10 i may need to restart trackbot-related stuff. 17:21:08 trackbot-ng, restart 17:21:16 let's see what happens. 17:24:16 trackbot-ng, excuse us 17:31:09 trackbot-ng, reload 17:31:31 hmm. 17:33:43 ah, have to do from team channels. 17:33:56 trackbot-ng, status 17:34:07 ahhh 17:34:45 let's see what status reports. 17:34:55 Action: shepazu to test trackbot-ng's nicknames 17:35:31 or we can test an action. 17:35:34 ACTION: cheese - to cut it - due 2008.05.30 17:35:38 hmm... 17:36:00 let's see if tracker picks this up... 17:36:17 it can take a delay when you have a couple of requests queued. 17:36:35 see. 17:36:38 Created ACTION-2053 - Test trackbot-ng's nicknames [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-06-05]. 17:36:43 Created ACTION-2054 - - to cut it [on Andrew Emmons - due 2008-05-29]. 17:37:04 does that look right. 17:37:13 s/./?/ 17:37:29 yeah, looks good! 17:37:31 thanks! 17:37:34 okely dokely. 17:38:23 hasta la vista, fezzy. 17:38:27 s-mon has left #svg