13:43:32 RRSAgent has joined #bpwg 13:43:32 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-bpwg-irc 13:43:34 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:43:34 Zakim has joined #bpwg 13:43:36 Zakim, this will be BPWG 13:43:36 ok, trackbot-ng; I see MWI_BPWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 17 minutes 13:43:37 Meeting: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 13:43:37 Date: 22 May 2008 13:43:38 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008May/0027.html 13:43:41 Chair: Jo 13:43:51 zakim, agenda? 13:43:51 I see nothing on the agenda 13:54:12 jo has joined #bpwg 13:56:48 yeliz has joined #bpwg 13:58:15 MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has now started 13:58:21 +jeffs 13:59:05 zakim, code? 13:59:05 the conference code is 2794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), jo 13:59:37 +francois 13:59:49 +jo 14:00:13 Scott has joined #bpwg 14:00:46 +Dom 14:00:50 aconnors has joined #bpwg 14:01:12 zakiim, mute me 14:01:18 zakim, mute me 14:01:18 jeffs should now be muted 14:01:21 Regrets: MartinJ, Murari, AlanTai, rob, nacho, PhilA, kemp, Pontus, AlanC 14:01:50 Bryan has joined #bpwg 14:01:59 +Adam 14:02:07 ack me 14:02:12 + +0774762aaaa 14:02:13 +Bryan_Sullivan 14:02:14 Regrets+ Kai, Abel 14:02:32 [my regrets for next week, while I'm at it :/] 14:02:41 aconnors has joined #bpwg 14:03:10 zakim, aaaa is Scott 14:03:10 +Scott; got it 14:03:20 aconnors has joined #bpwg 14:04:03 Scribe: jeffs 14:04:07 ScribeNick: jeffs 14:04:11 +??P15 14:04:23 zakim, ?P15 is yeliz 14:04:23 sorry, yeliz, I do not recognize a party named '?P15' 14:04:34 zakim, P15 is yeliz 14:04:34 sorry, yeliz, I do not recognize a party named 'P15' 14:04:41 zakim, ??P15 is yeliz 14:04:41 +yeliz; got it 14:04:53 zakim, mute yeliz 14:04:53 yeliz should now be muted 14:05:06 Regrets+ EdM 14:05:32 :) 14:06:20 discussion of face-to-face meeting upcoming 14:06:26 -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/BPWG-F2F-June-2008/ Registration for F2F meeting in Sophia 14:06:40 i/discussion/Topic: F2F Registration 14:06:41 reminder to reply to the questionairre ASAP 14:06:42 -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/BPWG-F2F-June-2008/results Responses to the Registration, 24 answers 14:06:50 (14 persons) 14:07:14 Topic: F2F Registration 14:08:08 jo: chair for next meeting needed... francois? 14:08:21 francois: agrees to chair next mtg 14:08:47 Topic: Use of ISSUE tracker 14:09:16 jo: reminding folks anybody can raise an issue, and this is probably the best way to do so 14:09:38 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/new Raise an Issue 14:09:43 manrique has joined #bpwg 14:10:19 Topic: Task Force 14:10:25 Topic: Task Force Reports 14:10:58 francois: report no real progress 14:11:14 francois: will send summary of discussion to clarify 14:11:48 jo: how many topics still open? 14:12:16 francois: thinks just 1 or 2 issues left to close out 14:13:42 jo: new draft of Pro 14:13:50 jo: please read 14:14:16 jo: should have new draft of accessibility next week 14:14:30 jo: MobileOK algprithms 14:14:52 algprithms/algorithms 14:15:20 francois: as far as can tell is mostly okay now 14:16:18 francois: objects w/o any type attributes now part of testing 14:16:31 +??P21 14:17:25 miguel has joined #bpwg 14:17:35 + +98439aabb 14:17:59 francois: example problem... primary image not MobileOK, fallback is okay, doc should test out okay 14:18:08 Zakim, +98439aabb is me 14:18:08 +miguel; got it 14:18:09 P21 should be me 14:18:18 zakim, ??21 is manrique 14:18:18 sorry, dom, I do not recognize a party named '??21' 14:18:21 zakim, ??P21 is manrique 14:18:21 +manrique; got it 14:18:28 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008May/0018.html Problem with Included resource and CONTENT_FORMAT 14:18:44 jo: probably relatively easy to fix by tidying up definitions 14:18:48 francois: agrees 14:19:24 jo: will redraft 14:19:44 ACTION: jo to redraft definition of Included resources according to the points noted by Francois 14:19:44 Created ACTION-761 - Redraft definition of Included resources according to the points noted by Francois [on Jo Rabin - due 2008-05-29]. 14:20:22 jo: any thoughts about discrepancies? may need to raise new issue(s) 14:20:25 SeanP has joined #bpwg 14:20:57 s/may need to raise new issue(s)/was the original reason for raising the ISSUE/ 14:20:59 +1 on the current algorithm being correct 14:21:17 jo: concerned to make sure we get this right this time 14:21:28 +SeanP 14:22:05 Topic: MobileOK License (cf. ISSUE-250) 14:22:08 ack me 14:22:14 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-bpwg/2008May/0043.html 14:22:28 dom: discusses license 14:22:37 http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2008/04-mobileok-policy.html 14:24:08 current discussion: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/250 14:24:11 jo: not sure if this should go to offline conversation 14:24:45 dom: need to separate legal issue(s) from actual quality control issues 14:25:01 s/quality control/policy or technical/ 14:25:22 chaals has joined #bpwg 14:25:30 jo: agrees 14:26:06 +??P25 14:26:13 jo: what about where someone puts on page not really qualified? tech issue or policy issue or...? 14:26:28 dom: both tech and legal issues involved 14:27:10 dom: lists what it takes to put MobileOK on page 14:27:49 jo: discussion of how to write this up in simple fashion 14:28:23 zakim, ??P25 is chaals 14:28:23 +chaals; got it 14:28:51 jo: thinks discussion is really about legal issues and under ISSUE 250 14:28:56 chaals has joined #bpwg 14:29:05 jo: which do we need to resolve as technical issues, and wish not? 14:29:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:29:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-bpwg-minutes.html chaals 14:29:44 ACTION: Charles to review ISSUE-250 with a view to how this affects content of mobileOK scheme 14:29:44 Created ACTION-762 - Review ISSUE-250 with a view to how this affects content of mobileOK scheme [on Charles McCathieNevile - due 2008-05-29]. 14:30:04 dom: more on license 14:30:13 rrsagent, make log member 14:30:49 dom: current thinking: pass tests, get badge... discussion? 14:31:07 jo: cannot imagine rush of products into this space 14:31:29 jo: progress on this is good 14:31:34 q+ 14:31:40 Topic: BP-2 14:32:42 jo: asks adam to talk about scope 14:33:28 adam: questions being discussed... what is a web application? bring in widget containers? redrafted scope section and sent out 14:33:53 adam: wants conclusion on in/out of scope for widget containers 14:34:05 jo: can we accomplish this today? 14:34:28 adam: wants to de-scope issue and simplify discussion 14:34:46 adam: how can we include BP in that area 14:34:49 q? 14:34:54 ack chaals 14:34:54 ack 14:34:55 jo: asks Bryan for comments 14:35:00 zakim, who's muted 14:35:00 dom, you need to end that query with '?' 14:35:01 zakim, who's muted? 14:35:01 I see jeffs, Dom, Scott, Bryan_Sullivan, yeliz muted 14:35:07 zakim, unmute Bryan 14:35:07 Bryan_Sullivan should no longer be muted 14:35:44 bryan: says sig stds activities and products out there 14:36:05 bryan: we will lose our leadership position if we do not address this issue 14:36:14 jo: how to accomplish this best? 14:36:28 jo: asks opinion of chaals 14:37:11 CMN: Don't see that these need to be out of scope, but don't think that there is a massive amount there 14:37:40 jo: what is minimum we need to accomplish on this? 14:37:54 jo: asks for resolution text 14:38:42 adam: wants enumeration of what to address for browsers, what for widget containers 14:38:43 [think the text would say that widgets should use W3C widget standard, and then meet other requirements of BP/BP2 (since there is a big escape clause in adapting to your host] 14:39:44 bryan: talks about multithreading browser environments and similarity of issues w what happens w widgets 14:40:11 bryan: took out characteristics list 14:40:27 bryan: issues developers face is equivalent 14:40:55 adam: did not like list, not sure what it added in terms of clarity 14:41:21 adam: agrees w bryan that much of this also appies to widget containers 14:42:12 bryan: doesn't want to discourage people reading this who are developing for non-browser environments 14:42:46 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Widgets are in scope of BP2, we will call out specific best practices that only apply to Widgets 14:42:46 chaalsXO has joined #bpwg 14:43:30 discussion of how to word this 14:43:31 q+ to say widgets are apps 14:44:00 ack ch 14:44:00 chaalsXO, you wanted to say widgets are apps 14:45:13 adam: say they are in scope and I will rewrite 14:45:52 CMN: The only special thing about widgets is the container format, for management, and I think we will say that certain kinds of application should be available packaged as widgets. For the rest, they are just web applications, and should be treated as such, conforming to BP. 14:46:03 jo: reservation... wants to leave resolution as-is to leave room to work 14:46:31 ACTION: Adam to reword scope section ref Widgets to clairy and introduce caveats 14:46:31 Created ACTION-763 - Reword scope section ref Widgets to clairy and introduce caveats [on Adam Connors - due 2008-05-29]. 14:47:05 s/clairy/clarify 14:47:06 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Widgets are in scope of BP2, we will call out specific best practices that only apply to Widgets 14:47:18 +1 14:47:23 +1 14:47:24 +1 14:47:59 RESOLUTION: Widgets are in scope of BP2, we will call out specific best practices that only apply to Widgets 14:48:24 jo: back to family resemblance list 14:48:43 adam: list too wordy and does not add clarity 14:49:01 adam: cut it out entirely 14:49:14 q+ 14:49:19 jo: likes list, but point is hard to define things sometimes 14:49:42 ack bry 14:49:55 bryan: is intent to collapse this list? 14:50:49 bryan: discusses items on list that could be represented 14:51:45 chaals: I don't think we can make a list that'll match the real world for long enough to make that exercice worth it 14:51:45 chaals: does not think we can make definitive list, and we must work with what we can write 14:52:22 ack cha 14:52:22 chaalsXO, you wanted to say no 14:52:25 zakim, who's muted? 14:52:25 I see jeffs, Dom, Scott, yeliz muted 14:52:29 zzakimj, unmute me 14:52:29 ack jeffs 14:54:17 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/BestPractices-2.0/ED-mobile-bp2-20080514 14:54:51 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/BestPractices-2.0/ED-mobile-bp2-20080521 14:55:35 zakim, mute me 14:55:35 jeffs should now be muted 14:56:11 q+, to ask if 1.4.5 is still necessary ? 14:57:00 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We back off from the list of Web Applicaiton charactersistics originally proposed by Jeffs in favour of the less definitve text currently under scope 14:57:27 s/charactersistics/characteristics 14:58:04 RESOLUTION: We back off from the list of Web Applicaiton characteristics originally proposed by Jeffs in favour of the less definitive text currently under scope 14:58:32 s/Applicaiton/Application 14:59:00 jo: thinks removal in favor of brevity good idea 14:59:21 [agreed to remove 1.4.4 and 1.4.5 in present draft] 14:59:45 bryan: discussion of moving text around and renumbering 15:00:25 bryan: took "requirement" part and put as part of "introduction" to "best practices" section 15:00:56 bryan: focus on tweaking 4.1 - 4.6 to make clearer 15:01:17 bryan: 4.6 incorporates more input 15:01:42 bryan: context- and device-info core of new input 15:02:21 jo: timing means many folks have not had a chance to review draft yet 15:02:42 jo: how close are we to publishing a 1st working draft of this? 15:03:12 bryan: we are close, need to address if structure is meeting needs? 15:03:31 bryan: do we want to put in objectives? or is that just "more words" 15:04:11 adam: likes rearranging, thinks more in-scope, thinks pretty close but wants to re-read end-to-end 15:04:34 adam: do we still need a requirements section? 15:05:13 jo: discussion of document wording 15:05:39 jo: review it over the next 1-2 weeks 15:06:29 jo: how are we going to organize meeting? 15:07:49 ACTION: Jo to remind DKA that he was going to book a room at Vodafone for the Editorial Meeting 15:07:49 Created ACTION-764 - Remind DKA that he was going to book a room at Vodafone for the Editorial Meeting [on Jo Rabin - due 2008-05-29]. 15:08:07 Topic: any other business 15:08:28 RRSAgent, make log public 15:08:39 jo: reminder to register for f2f ASAP 15:08:39 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:08:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-bpwg-minutes.html francois 15:08:45 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/BPWG-F2F-June-2008/ 15:09:00 -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/BPWG-F2F-June-2008/ Registration 15:09:11 jo: closing out meeting 15:09:17 -Dom 15:09:19 -jo 15:09:19 -Bryan_Sullivan 15:09:20 see you 15:09:20 -yeliz 15:09:21 -Adam 15:09:22 -chaals 15:09:23 -SeanP 15:09:23 -Scott 15:09:24 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:09:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-bpwg-minutes.html francois 15:09:28 -miguel 15:09:30 -francois 15:09:30 -jeffs 15:09:35 -manrique 15:09:36 MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has ended 15:09:37 Attendees were jeffs, francois, jo, Dom, Adam, +0774762aaaa, Bryan_Sullivan, Scott, yeliz, miguel, manrique, SeanP, chaals 15:09:56 Scott has left #bpwg 15:14:25 yeliz has left #bpwg 15:15:13 zakim, who is on the call? 15:15:13 apparently MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has ended, francois 15:15:14 On IRC I see chaalsXO, chaals, jo, Zakim, RRSAgent, matt, francois, trackbot-ng, dom 15:15:20 Present- Matt 15:19:34 Present: jeffs, francois, jo, dom, adam, Bryan_Sullivan, Scott, yeliz, miguel, manrique, SeanP, chaals 15:19:37 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:19:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-bpwg-minutes.html francois 15:30:31 rrsagent, bye 15:30:31 I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-bpwg-actions.rdf : 15:30:31 ACTION: jo to redraft definition of Included resources according to the points noted by Francois [1] 15:30:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-bpwg-irc#T14-19-44 15:30:31 ACTION: Charles to review ISSUE-250 with a view to how this affects content of mobileOK scheme [2] 15:30:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-bpwg-irc#T14-29-44 15:30:31 ACTION: Adam to reword scope section ref Widgets to clairy and introduce caveats [3] 15:30:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-bpwg-irc#T14-46-31 15:30:31 ACTION: Jo to remind DKA that he was going to book a room at Vodafone for the Editorial Meeting [4] 15:30:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-bpwg-irc#T15-07-49