IRC log of svg on 2008-05-15
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 10:30:01 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #svg
- 10:30:01 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/05/15-svg-irc
- 10:30:03 [trackbot-ng]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 10:30:03 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #svg
- 10:30:05 [trackbot-ng]
- Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG
- 10:30:05 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot-ng; I see GA_SVGWG()6:30AM scheduled to start now
- 10:30:06 [trackbot-ng]
- Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference
- 10:30:07 [trackbot-ng]
- Date: 15 May 2008
- 10:30:34 [Zakim]
- GA_SVGWG()6:30AM has now started
- 10:30:41 [Zakim]
- +??P0
- 10:30:50 [aemmons]
- zakim, ??p0 is me
- 10:30:50 [Zakim]
- +aemmons; got it
- 10:31:25 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 10:31:37 [anthony]
- zakim, ??P1 is me
- 10:31:37 [Zakim]
- +anthony; got it
- 10:32:58 [ed]
- ed has joined #svg
- 10:33:47 [Zakim]
- +??P2
- 10:33:58 [ed]
- Zakim, ??P2 is me
- 10:33:58 [Zakim]
- +ed; got it
- 10:42:46 [anthony]
- scribe: anthony
- 10:42:57 [anthony]
- chair: Andrew Emmons
- 10:43:16 [ChrisL]
- ChrisL has joined #svg
- 10:43:48 [anthony]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0041.html
- 10:44:09 [Zakim]
- +ChrisL
- 10:44:17 [anthony]
- Regrets: Andreas, Cameron
- 10:44:42 [anthony]
- Topic: F2F Agenda recap
- 10:44:45 [aemmons]
- http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/wiki/SophiaAntipolisF2F2008
- 10:45:04 [anthony]
- AE: Link to agenda
- 10:45:16 [anthony]
- ... is there anything else that we want to add?
- 10:47:03 [shepazu]
- Zakim, call doug-work
- 10:47:04 [Zakim]
- ok, shepazu; the call is being made
- 10:47:05 [Zakim]
- +Doug
- 10:49:54 [ChrisL]
- http://www.cg06.fr/transport/lignes-tam/230.pdf
- 10:52:46 [anthony]
- AE: Get an idea of our time spent on each topic
- 10:53:11 [anthony]
- ... so if our goal is to make a new publication of the test suite then a bit of time will be spent on that
- 10:53:18 [anthony]
- ... do we agree on that
- 10:53:23 [anthony]
- CL: Good idea
- 10:53:56 [anthony]
- DS: Put priority on getting whatever needs to be done to get Tiny 1.2 published
- 10:54:09 [anthony]
- ... next is SVG in HTML
- 10:54:28 [anthony]
- ... third thing is what is the nature of the SVG IG
- 10:54:35 [anthony]
- ... should have a short discussion on this
- 10:54:39 [anthony]
- ... what can we get from therm
- 10:54:45 [anthony]
- s/therm/them/
- 10:54:56 [anthony]
- ... membership policy, what they can do, etc
- 10:55:17 [anthony]
- AE: Discussion of the new WG home page
- 10:55:30 [anthony]
- ... also we have XML HTTP request review
- 10:55:39 [anthony]
- DS: Sort of a moving target
- 10:55:45 [anthony]
- ... XH1 is in LC
- 10:55:50 [anthony]
- ... should review that
- 10:56:01 [anthony]
- ... not necessarily in the F2F
- 10:56:12 [anthony]
- AE: So as far as SVG in HTML, how long will it take to do that?
- 10:56:26 [ChrisL]
- (that pdf link has two pages, by the way - page two is the nice to sophia direction)
- 10:56:43 [anthony]
- DS: A couple of us could break off into a scrum
- 10:57:32 [Zakim]
- -ed
- 10:57:50 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 10:57:51 [anthony]
- AE: I think for the test suite there will a lot of work there
- 10:58:02 [anthony]
- ... put 3 or 4 days to it
- 10:58:10 [ed]
- Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
- 10:58:10 [Zakim]
- +ed; got it
- 10:58:10 [anthony]
- ... does that sounds like peoples expectations
- 10:58:14 [anthony]
- DS: I would expect 3
- 10:58:17 [anthony]
- ... but I could be wrong
- 10:58:38 [anthony]
- AE: We can publish and updated test suite with out an implementation report?
- 10:58:42 [anthony]
- CL: Yes we can
- 10:59:03 [anthony]
- AE: There's no reason to not be able to do one, could be distracting perhaps
- 10:59:11 [anthony]
- ED: Could take a bit of time
- 11:03:01 [ChrisL]
- Meet in hotel lobby at 07:50, I wil ltake you on the tram to the bus staion
- 11:03:17 [ChrisL]
- then we get the 08:15 sophia express, arriving 09:15
- 11:03:24 [ChrisL]
- start meeting at 09:30
- 11:03:40 [anthony]
- Topic: Test Review Status
- 11:04:18 [anthony]
- AE: Try to get people to review tests in spare time
- 11:04:29 [anthony]
- ... still some tests on the list that don't have a reviewer
- 11:05:45 [anthony]
- Topic: 1.2 Filter Region Extensions
- 11:05:46 [aemmons]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008May/0014.html
- 11:06:04 [anthony]
- ED: I have had a chance to read this
- 11:06:08 [anthony]
- ... not sure I agree with this
- 11:06:46 [anthony]
- ... can have filter units userSpaceOnUse
- 11:07:07 [anthony]
- ... there is a need to have a filter margins to disappear
- 11:07:32 [anthony]
- ... Having margins specified in the mark up is ok
- 11:08:18 [anthony]
- CL: Good for authoring tools to specify this
- 11:09:08 [anthony]
- AE: Do we agree with that and should we reply?
- 11:09:14 [anthony]
- ED: We should reply
- 11:09:21 [anthony]
- ... I would like to keep filter margins in the spec
- 11:09:48 [anthony]
- ... tools can specify the markup
- 11:10:01 [anthony]
- CL: Think we all agree with you pretty much
- 11:10:34 [ed]
- s/tools can specify the markup/tools can generate the filter-margins markup, and viewers will be able to handle that more efficiently/
- 11:10:44 [anthony]
- ACTION: Erik to respond to Robert regarding the removal of SVG 1.2 filter region extensions
- 11:10:44 [trackbot-ng]
- Created ACTION-2018 - Respond to Robert regarding the removal of SVG 1.2 filter region extensions [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-05-22].
- 11:11:05 [anthony]
- Topic: feTurbulence clarifications
- 11:11:11 [aemmons]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008May/0017.html
- 11:11:25 [anthony]
- ED: This is pretty much resolved as to what he was asking
- 11:11:30 [anthony]
- ... in an email thread
- 11:11:56 [anthony]
- ... he was asking what one of the parameters to feTurbulence meant
- 11:12:10 [anthony]
- CL: Do people use that C code, does it help them?
- 11:12:13 [anthony]
- ED: I think so
- 11:12:34 [anthony]
- CL: Is it useful as documentation?
- 11:12:39 [anthony]
- ED: I think so
- 11:13:01 [anthony]
- CL: They decided in the past to document using pseudo code
- 11:13:22 [anthony]
- ... don't mind putting it in a separate file
- 11:13:46 [anthony]
- ED: Would like to have Cameron to say something about this
- 11:13:52 [anthony]
- ... had look at the filter code in Batik
- 11:14:12 [anthony]
- ... looked to me like my interpretation was correct
- 11:15:15 [anthony]
- ACTION: Eric to clarify parameters to feTurbulence as per Robert's email
- 11:15:15 [trackbot-ng]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - Eric
- 11:15:26 [anthony]
- ACTION: Erik to clarify parameters to feTurbulence as per Robert's email
- 11:15:27 [trackbot-ng]
- Created ACTION-2019 - Clarify parameters to feTurbulence as per Robert's email [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-05-22].
- 11:15:59 [anthony]
- Topic: source-image offset-dimensions control
- 11:16:01 [aemmons]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008May/0018.html
- 11:16:07 [anthony]
- ED: was experimenting a bit
- 11:16:14 [anthony]
- ... which part of an image you draw
- 11:16:19 [anthony]
- ... in an SVG element
- 11:16:35 [anthony]
- ... would be useful to pick part of an image
- 11:16:45 [aemmons]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008May/0011.html
- 11:16:50 [anthony]
- ... in image co-ordinates which would be pixels I guess
- 11:17:16 [anthony]
- AE: What feed back did you get on that?
- 11:17:22 [anthony]
- ED: Feedback is positive
- 11:18:04 [anthony]
- ... would like to specify percentages of the dimension of the image
- 11:18:36 [anthony]
- CL: so can't you do this in clip?
- 11:18:38 [anthony]
- ... you can't do any percentages in the clip and you would have to know the dimensions
- 11:18:59 [anthony]
- s/... you can't do any percentages in the clip and you would have to know the dimensions/ED: you can't do any percentages in the clip and you would have to know the dimensions/
- 11:19:34 [anthony]
- AE: Interesting if it could be animated
- 11:20:05 [ed]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008May/0025.html
- 11:20:22 [anthony]
- ED: Might be possible to do a more general solution
- 11:20:31 [anthony]
- ... when referencing an SVG image
- 11:20:39 [anthony]
- ... can't override the view box currently
- 11:20:46 [anthony]
- AE: My question is where do you think this would go?
- 11:20:52 [anthony]
- ... a future module?
- 11:20:54 [anthony]
- ED: Yes
- 11:21:14 [anthony]
- AE: What kind of module would this be?
- 11:21:19 [anthony]
- ... right now it's in structure
- 11:21:32 [anthony]
- ED: Would be useful to discuss how we move forward with the modules
- 11:21:44 [anthony]
- ... might be useful to have an SVG Full call module
- 11:21:53 [Zakim]
- -aemmons
- 11:22:02 [ed]
- s/full call/full core/
- 11:22:10 [anthony]
- ... certainly a need to add some definitions on top of Tiny
- 11:22:14 [aemmons_]
- aemmons_ has joined #svg
- 11:22:30 [Zakim]
- +??P0
- 11:22:36 [aemmons_]
- zakim, ??p0 is me
- 11:22:36 [Zakim]
- +aemmons_; got it
- 11:22:38 [anthony]
- CL: You mean a whole single module that takes Tiny to Full?
- 11:23:03 [anthony]
- ED: Intro definitions need to be updated and what kind of links as well
- 11:23:51 [anthony]
- AE: If there is a general agreement, do we a place on the wiki to put these new ideas
- 11:24:16 [anthony]
- DS: Use tracker and wiki
- 11:24:29 [anthony]
- ... Tracker can document individual issues and wiki can be used to give priority
- 11:24:37 [anthony]
- ED: Would like to get feedback from the interest group
- 11:25:55 [anthony]
- ACTION: Doug to set up a wiki page that stores our ideas for modules
- 11:25:55 [trackbot-ng]
- Created ACTION-2020 - Set up a wiki page that stores our ideas for modules [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-05-22].
- 11:26:31 [anthony]
- DS: What exactly is the first thing I should be putting up here?
- 11:26:44 [anthony]
- AE: The source image proposal that we discussed
- 11:28:42 [anthony]
- Topic: filter primitive subregion and feGaussianBlur
- 11:28:52 [aemmons]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008May/0013.html
- 11:30:08 [anthony]
- ED: I guess he's correct in restricting calculation is kind of ambiguous
- 11:30:18 [anthony]
- ... the section he is quoting is quite generic
- 11:30:49 [anthony]
- ... also says it has to be treated like a hard clipping region
- 11:30:59 [anthony]
- ... not sure if I replied to this or not
- 11:31:10 [anthony]
- AE: No reply to this
- 11:31:22 [anthony]
- ... so is this something that would warrant changing the wording?
- 11:31:53 [anthony]
- ... is there something we could change to make it more obvious to others?
- 11:32:14 [anthony]
- ED: Could add implementations are recommended to not perform filtering outside of the hard clipping region
- 11:32:30 [anthony]
- DS: I can't imagine that implementations might want to
- 11:33:03 [anthony]
- ... we should make it informative not normative
- 11:33:09 [anthony]
- ... this is an implementation tip
- 11:33:16 [anthony]
- ... not a conformance criteria
- 11:35:25 [anthony]
- ED: The important part is the clipping region
- 11:36:29 [anthony]
- AE: There's probably no point in adding anything, unless it's a really bad problem
- 11:36:59 [anthony]
- DS: We could make the change and respond
- 11:37:15 [anthony]
- ED: There is a second part here
- 11:37:20 [anthony]
- ... haven't had time to study that
- 11:37:26 [anthony]
- ... that would need to be addressed as well
- 11:37:40 [anthony]
- CL: What it means it doesn't reflect
- 11:37:47 [anthony]
- ... doesn't have an edge
- 11:37:57 [anthony]
- ... that says now the filter repeats if it is big enough
- 11:38:56 [ChrisL]
- > If the input has infinite extent and is a tile, the filter is evaluated
- 11:38:56 [ChrisL]
- with periodic boundary conditions.
- 11:39:25 [ChrisL]
- surely if its infinite extent then whether it tiles is irrelevant. there can only be one such tile, so its boundaries are never reached
- 11:39:40 [ChrisL]
- check where that sentence comes from, it looks bogus to me.
- 11:40:19 [anthony]
- ACTION: Erik to add informative implementation tip regarding filter primitive subregion and research the second question in Robert's email and respond to that as well
- 11:40:19 [trackbot-ng]
- Created ACTION-2021 - Add informative implementation tip regarding filter primitive subregion and research the second question in Robert's email and respond to that as well [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-05-22].
- 11:50:39 [Zakim]
- -ChrisL
- 11:50:40 [Zakim]
- -aemmons_
- 11:50:42 [Zakim]
- -ed
- 11:50:50 [Zakim]
- -anthony
- 11:51:01 [Zakim]
- -Doug
- 11:51:02 [Zakim]
- GA_SVGWG()6:30AM has ended
- 11:51:04 [Zakim]
- Attendees were aemmons, anthony, ed, ChrisL, Doug, aemmons_
- 11:54:12 [anthony]
- zakim, bye
- 11:54:12 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #svg
- 11:54:18 [anthony]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 11:54:18 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/15-svg-minutes.html anthony