17:19:13 RRSAgent has joined #ua 17:19:13 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/04/17-ua-irc 17:19:31 rrsagent, set logs public 17:19:42 zakim, this will be wai-u 17:19:42 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, AllanJ 17:19:53 zakim, this will be wai 17:19:53 "wai" matches WAI_EOWG(UMTF)2:00PM, and WAI_UAWG()1:00PM, AllanJ 17:20:17 zakim, this will be wai_u 17:20:17 ok, AllanJ; I see WAI_UAWG()1:00PM scheduled to start 20 minutes ago 17:39:57 Jan has joined #ua 17:46:06 KFord has joined #ua 17:50:38 Jan has joined #ua 17:54:01 Scribe: Jan 17:55:00 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2008AprJun/0048.html 17:55:30 Meeting: WAI UA 17:55:38 Chair: Jim Allan 17:56:43 WAI_UAWG()1:00PM has now started 17:56:44 +[Microsoft] 17:57:07 zakim, [Microsoft] is really KFord 17:57:07 +KFord; got it 17:57:46 +AllanJ 17:57:48 -AllanJ 17:57:48 +AllanJ 17:57:52 This is just an FYI that Marc from IE will be joinging us today but he will be a couple minutes late. He's here to talk about the ARIA document and represents us in PF. 17:58:27 +??P8 17:58:44 zakim, ??P8 is really Jan 17:58:44 +Jan; got it 18:00:30 aaronlev has joined #ua 18:00:34 what's the passcode? 18:00:52 82941# 18:01:34 +Cantor 18:02:02 i got invalid passcode 18:02:23 +Aaron_Leventhal 18:02:28 now it works 18:02:37 +Gregory_Rosmaita 18:04:02 oedipus_laptop has joined #ua 18:06:54 Alan has joined #ua 18:07:16 ? 18:07:18 Welcome. 18:07:23 Thanks 18:07:42 Topic: 1. Charter review 18:07:53 http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2008/draft_uawg_charter_20mar08.html 18:08:05 JA: Says what we are going to do for a couple years 18:08:14 JA: Which will mostly be UAAG2 18:08:30 KF: Question about success criteria.... 18:08:51 KF: Success criteria don't include testing materials...should they? 18:09:12 JA: Don't know 18:09:19 JR: Sure let's add it 18:09:29 KF: Other than that it looks ok? 18:10:09 JA: OK 18:12:25 what about a UA Support For... type document which is maintained to document conformance / support? 18:12:59 JR: I was following WCAG's kead on how to fill in charter 18:13:20 yes JR 18:13:34 KF: So an implementation summary? 18:13:44 KF: How all browsers have done 18:13:49 yes, 1.0 does, but it hasn't been updated since 2003 - i have an action item to update it 18:14:08 JA: Right and that's part of the CR process - Implementation report 18:14:21 I'd be willing to help with this update, at least for IE. 18:15:30 JR: Sometimes there is a lack of manpower to do a wide effort at conformance testing 18:15:42 JA: OK we can focus a bit more on that after we get to Rec 18:16:07 AL: Charter not a lot of detail 18:16:13 http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/temp/w3c/test/until-user-agent-clauses.html 18:16:26 http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/temp/w3c/test/WAI-UA-Support_2007.html 18:16:42 AL: Felt requirements document is more useful (http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-UAAG20-requirements-20071031/) 18:16:59 AL: I'd be willing to provide feedback on the Req document 18:17:10 JAL Good! We'd like feedback! 18:17:20 JA: Anything else? 18:17:25 AC: Mission... 18:18:06 AC: Should Mission also include statement that support documents will be created to the guideline. 18:18:28 JA: Right but maybe that's just duplicating too much. 18:18:49 AC: Interesting how repetitive the document is 18:19:28 http://www.w3.org/WAI/Resources/WAI-UA-Support 18:20:13 JR: These charters are very high level 18:20:58 q+ to ask that Access Module issues be added to agenda 18:21:44 JA: We'll vote next week...then we need to go through Judy 18:21:47 ack me 18:21:47 oedipus_laptop, you wanted to ask that Access Module issues be added to agenda 18:23:17 GR: Acces module is important piece - is it ok if cross posts coninue? 18:23:24 JA: Yes cross posts ok 18:23:31 Marc is on his way to my office. 18:23:49 must activate be boolean? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2008Apr/0175.html 18:24:16 redefining keys and user control cascade: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2008Apr/0176.html 18:24:28 2. Discuss/review ARIA UA Implementors Guide 18:24:32 (both XHTML Access Module Issues) 18:24:48 AL: Introduces self... 18:25:07 AL: Works on Firefox, WAI-PF, ARIA 18:25:25 http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria 18:25:33 http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-roadmap 18:25:37 http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-primer 18:25:41 http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-practices 18:25:52 Marc Sibley Arrives 18:26:11 http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/ARIA_User_Agent_Implementors_Guide 18:26:33 MS: Introduces self, works on IE and ARIA with WAI-PF 18:26:55 MS: So has been working with Simon and AL on this best practices guide 18:27:06 JA: Would like to throw it open 18:27:21 AL: My question is UA working group... 18:27:32 platform specifics 18:27:41 AL: How deep is UA going to get into platform specifics 18:27:42 thought we were platform agnostic 18:27:55 JA: In the past, not deep.... 18:28:01 spec should be platform agnostic, techniques were to address 18:28:10 JA: Gave some examples, but pretty agnostic 18:28:20 +Earl_Johnson 18:28:30 s/techniques were/techniques where 18:28:37 AL: Right...from talking to other browser vendors...but majority of our work is platform specific.... 18:28:55 AL: WHat we really need is help coordinating between platforms 18:29:12 KF: I don't see that in Guidelines doc it's in tech guide 18:29:19 AL: Don't care about names of documents 18:29:29 AL: Just care about practical 18:29:54 KF: But our first mission on UA is to be agnostic...in general this is what browser needs to do 18:30:00 first, do no harm... 18:30:09 KF: These are not UA reqs on platform A 18:30:29 AL: OK if not you, then say that and someone else can do it 18:30:49 AL: Should I be doing it...implementors guide for ARIA... 18:30:54 q+ 18:31:05 AL: This is the kind of thing HTML should have done.... 18:31:49 GR: I think the UAWG is trying to work directly with other working groups eg HTML5.... 18:32:07 GR: e.g. on the User Agent guidance from HTML45 18:32:10 GR: e.g. on the User Agent guidance from HTML5 18:32:28 GR: So we are giving feedback back to others 18:32:56 AL: So ARIA implementors guide....not really best practices 18:33:03 GR: Right that's what developers need 18:33:20 AL: Then I'm told go to UA group who should be writing this 18:33:37 AL: Then WAI-UA responds that's not where are bread is buttered 18:33:52 GR: We want to work with ARIA best practices... 18:34:10 GR: See ARIA as standard W3C way of feeding in to APIs... 18:34:20 GR: THen they can look up the mapping 18:34:28 AL: Where do they look them up? 18:34:46 GR: In appendices of ARIA Best Practices doc 18:35:12 AL: Ok but doesn't map to the platform specifics 18:35:36 AL: OK it's developed....too big for best practices, not for authors 18:35:46 AL: Do you see my problem? 18:36:08 MS: OK so you see these don't fit in Web developers doc... 18:36:11 q- 18:36:15 MS: My opinion... 18:36:43 MS: I think as groups like HTML start to develop specs, must be a best practices implemention guide... 18:37:03 MS: I think HTML5 guide should be very developer-centric 18:37:22 MS: I don't think UA could do implementation guides for all of the formats 18:37:45 MS: UA is more consultants to all the different groups...but they need to do theri own 18:37:59 aria to msaa mappings: (based on moz dev) http://esw.w3.org/topic/PF/ARIA/BestPractices/API_MSAA 18:38:20 MS: Since no one else doing ARIA, WAI should do it 18:38:36 http://esw.w3.org/topic/PF/ARIA/BestPractices/API_IA2 18:38:52 JA: This is very detailed stuff having to do with browsers...UAWG always stayed at high level... 18:38:57 http://esw.w3.org/topic/PF/ARIA/BestPractices/API_ATK 18:39:11 JA: Implementation "on top" specified (in the past). 18:39:24 aaronlev, do you want something more akin to http://a11y.org/a11y-dom-apis 18:39:31 JA: The members of the working list aren't at this level 18:39:44 AL: Good admission...I don't think you are ready for this 18:39:55 JA: Well all the people left to work on ARIA over there 18:40:17 q+ to say UA members need to become more familiar with ARIA and its implementation STRATEGIES 18:40:17 JA: Applies direcly but my concern is how many platforms are we going to do? Mobile other OS etc. 18:40:26 JA: How far does it go? 18:40:30 AL: Pretty far 18:40:42 KF: Unless we expand charter 18:40:48 KF: We don't cover this 18:41:02 KF: ARIA hot now, but something else will be hot in 5 years 18:41:30 KF: At that time they should be able to go to UAAG and found out what they need to be able to do with their format 18:41:55 q+ 18:42:07 AL: Not just me, take Opera developers 18:42:16 AL: CMN was on user agent before 18:42:47 AL: But what they really need is list of all HTML attributes etc. 18:43:04 AL: Since it's not there they'll reverse engineer FF etc. 18:43:06 http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/TS/ 18:43:14 (UAAG 1.0 test suite) 18:43:24 AL: I look at top level stuff for a but, but then focus on low level 18:43:44 AL: Maybe you could be more of a host for a community to work on things 18:44:08 GR: Well the mappings should be standard and Access API dependent 18:44:26 KF: So....not in charter now.... 18:44:48 ARIA provide standard calls to accessibility APIs 18:44:49 KF: But middle ground could be to facilitate coordination between browser developers 18:45:26 AL: We put our wiki on ???...because it is neutral 18:46:01 KF: So I'd be comfortable with facilitation....vs. we the user agent does the deep dive... 18:46:09 KF: But needs charter changes 18:46:34 AL: Ultimately I'd like to have software tools to know if things are done correctly or not 18:46:37 hyper-specific documents are a danger - people often implement off of a table or checklist rather than understanding the logic and structure, which leads to "dumb" implementations 18:47:21 KF: But you the ARIA group would be responsible for the validators 18:48:27 GR: My concern is that in hyper-specific documents...people implement of table but not necessarily ....understand concepts 18:48:59 GR: ARIA is there in the middle and it is APIs to move to it 18:49:25 AL: Access APIs are rich enough...but the APIs per platform are different 18:50:09 MS: Totally agree .... each group developping technology needs to think end to end... 18:50:23 MS: So this is why I think it should go along side the other ARIA docs 18:51:07 GR: We are talking about access to DOM....so ARIA developers not responsible end to end....because APIs have role 18:51:28 AL: We do want to try to ensure that the user agents do things the same on the various platforms 18:51:43 GR: Violent agreement... 18:52:36 JR: PF says it doesn't want to host. UA could host, non-rec track items. There is some presedent 18:52:53 JR: Why UA space and not PF space 18:53:24 GR: Are we then responsible? 18:53:42 oedipus_laptop has joined #ua 18:53:47 GR: Is this stuff formally coming out of ARIA best practices 18:53:51 AL: Yes 18:54:25 MS: Fine with UA, but as we make changes to ARIA....will change ARIA implementation guide 18:54:45 q} to say that aria is the abstract the DHTML style guide is the where the abstract meets hardware 18:54:53 AL: So...accessibility needs to be living breathing documents 18:55:14 AL: Take live regions for example, we'lll learn a lot 18:55:48 GR: Right so PF defines abstract but let's DHTML style guide to define details 18:56:02 KF: we are inagreement I think.... 18:56:38 KF: To me PF working group still responsible for technologies they develop 18:56:55 KF: We can consult but can't be experts on all formats 18:57:11 strong plus one to KF's last statement - work in liaison with other WG to advise and counsel UA conformance/implementation/requirements 18:57:28 KF: So we could expand charter to host best practices for other formats... 18:57:42 KF: But not being experts in them 18:57:54 AC: So we are just high level things 18:57:59 also need to address ARIA for those without assistive technology (native UA support) 18:58:20 KF: THink so....value of high level base requirements 18:58:23 JA: Right 18:58:36 MS: Driving key accessible principles into different techs 18:58:45 http://a11y.org/kafs 18:58:48 http://a11y.org/kafs-gta 18:59:00 the second URI is generic test assertions 18:59:08 EJ: (Earl Johnson) in Linux foundation...we callled them generic test assertions due to differences across platforms 18:59:28 EJ: Can you said it this range, can yout turn on/off beep 18:59:53 EJ: Then up to UA developer to figure out how they will meet that test 19:00:25 JA: That's how we've operated.... 19:00:46 JA: UAAG doesn't get down to platform, programming languages... 19:00:58 detailed work on wiki? 19:01:09 JA: But what I'm hearing today is that UAWG could provide the space 19:01:17 precedent: EO working on ARIA educational materials 19:01:27 q+ 19:01:49 GR: Think EO is working on educational stuff for ARIA 19:04:09 Action KF, JA, JR: Think about charter change to take into account user agent implementations...eg link to HTML5 or publishing note as in ARIA 19:04:59 JA: Marc and Aaron, we've reached end of time...do you want to come back? 19:06:13 AL: So we are pushing format groups to produce user agent implementation techniques 19:06:19 GR: Yes 19:06:37 AL: So the requiements don't get down to APIs 19:07:17 AL: Guess I could come in, but would prefer just to review text, emaiols etc 19:07:59 MS: I could prob come back thurs but will talk to Kelly 19:08:06 -Gregory_Rosmaita 19:08:07 -Aaron_Leventhal 19:08:11 -Cantor 19:08:15 -KFord 19:08:57 http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/ARIA_User_Agent_Implementors_Guide 19:12:28 RRSAgent, make minutes 19:12:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/17-ua-minutes.html Jan 19:12:39 RRSAgent, set logs public 19:12:46 Zakim, bye 19:12:46 leaving. As of this point the attendees were KFord, AllanJ, Jan, Cantor, Aaron_Leventhal, Gregory_Rosmaita, Earl_Johnson 19:12:46 Zakim has left #ua 19:12:54 RRSAgent, bye 19:12:54 I see no action items