13:00:16 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #xhtml
13:00:16 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/04/09-xhtml-irc
13:15:36 <ShaneM> ShaneM has joined #xhtml
13:28:20 <Tina> Tina has joined #xhtml
13:29:05 <ShaneM> I dont think you are late.  I think we start in 15
13:30:26 <Tina> My timing *and* my time zone is messed up, I'm afraid
13:36:42 <Steven-eee> Steven-eee has joined #xhtml
13:39:19 <Roland> Zakim, this will be XHTML2
13:39:19 <Zakim> ok, Roland, I see IA_XHTML2()9:45AM already started
13:39:46 <myakura> myakura has joined #xhtml
13:39:57 <ShaneM> why does it think it is already started I wonder
13:40:03 <Steven-eee> zakim, who is here?
13:40:04 <Zakim> On the phone I see Roland
13:40:05 <Zakim> On IRC I see myakura, Steven-eee, Tina, ShaneM, RRSAgent, Zakim, Roland, Lachy, deane, krijnh
13:40:45 <Roland> Meeting: XHTML2 WG Weekly Teleconference
13:40:54 <Roland> Chair: Roland
13:41:13 <Roland> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Apr/0014.html
13:41:59 <Roland> rrsagent, make minutes
13:41:59 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/09-xhtml-minutes.html Roland
13:42:12 <Roland> rrsagent, make log public
13:43:03 <Steven-eee> Previous: http://www.w3.org/2008/04/02-xhtml-minutes 
13:43:30 <oedipus> oedipus has joined #xhtml
13:43:50 <Roland> Regrets: Alessio
13:44:45 <Zakim> +ShaneM
13:44:48 <Zakim> -Roland
13:44:49 <Zakim> +Roland
13:45:42 <markbirbeck> markbirbeck has joined #xhtml
13:46:01 <yamx> yamx has joined #xhtml
13:47:21 <Zakim> +??P5
13:47:31 <yamx> ??P5 is yamx
13:48:10 <oedipus> oedipus has joined #xhtml
13:49:55 <oedipus> GJR: having very nasty computer problems -- will call in a.s.a.p. -- just want to communicate that there is no obstacle or objection from PF on moving Role forward if that is what the xHTML2 WG wants -- Role transition gets a big plus one from me (in case i miss the discussion)
13:51:20 <Tina> :)
13:53:05 <markbirbeck> zakim, code?
13:53:05 <Zakim> the conference code is 94865 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck
13:53:18 <ShaneM> scribe: shane
13:53:29 <ShaneM> err... Scribe: ShaneM
13:53:46 <Roland> rrsagent, make log public
13:53:55 <Zakim> +markbirbeck
13:53:57 <oedipus> oedipus has joined #xhtml
13:54:09 <ShaneM> Scribe: ShaneM
13:54:13 <Roland> Scribe: ShaneM
13:56:21 <ShaneM> Topic: CSS Namespaces
13:56:52 <ShaneM> No progress yet.  Seems like there is some softening of their position.  Need a formal response from them.
13:56:59 <ShaneM> Topic: XML:Base
13:57:03 <ShaneM> No progress yet.
13:57:09 <ShaneM> Topic: F2F in Minneapolis
13:57:14 <ShaneM> Should have a contract resolved this week.
13:57:25 <ShaneM> Topic: CURIE transition
13:57:29 <ShaneM> Public working draft is updated.
13:58:06 <ShaneM> Topic: XHTML-Role to last call
13:58:17 <ShaneM> Request to publish has been made.
13:58:30 <ShaneM> Values of role in the XHTML vocabulary
13:58:43 <ShaneM> see http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab
13:58:52 <ShaneM> Roland: what do we need to do here?
13:59:59 <ShaneM> ShaneM: Let the ARIA group do it
14:00:46 <ShaneM> markbirbeck: values are going to be used quite widely.  We might need to ensure that non-ARIA values are "correct"
14:01:27 <oedipus> oedipus has joined #xhtml
14:01:33 <ShaneM> Roland: perhaps the vocabulary should be rec track
14:01:33 <markbirbeck> s/non-ARIA values/values/
14:02:22 <Zakim> +Gregory_Rosmaita
14:02:31 <ShaneM> ShaneM: while the document itself is not rec-track, the input to it IS.
14:03:20 <ShaneM> Roland: At least there should be an appropriate process for ensuring that things only go in there after appropriate review.
14:03:50 <ShaneM> oedipus: I have an action (from the PFWG) to review Mark's comments on the vocabulary.
14:05:29 <ShaneM> oedipus: there was a mail from the PF chair that was private asking about how the vocab document evolved and whether it was tied to the role document.  
14:06:34 <ShaneM> Roland: need to ensure there is no collisions between the XHTML values and the ARIA values.  ShaneM says that he has already worked that out with Michael Cooper.
14:07:07 <ShaneM> oedipus: Any redundant values should be left to the XHTML Role document.
14:07:42 <ShaneM> markbirbeck: concerned that the ARIA group can put their values straight into the vocabulary.
14:08:24 <ShaneM> markbirbeck: the "multiple word" approach to terms in the ARIA document sort of misses the point of role.  Should be "alert dialog", not "alertdialog".
14:08:40 <ShaneM> q
14:09:14 <Steven-eee> as long as it's not aria:alert aria:dialog
14:09:15 <oedipus> oedipus has joined #xhtml
14:09:38 <markbirbeck> q+
14:09:50 <ShaneM> oedipus: Some of the values in the ARIA spec are related to how assistive technologies work in the marketplace today and are driven my market realities.
14:09:51 <ShaneM> q+
14:10:21 <ShaneM> oedipus: values like "slider" are for things we have inherited.  Not for the future.  This is related to XHTML 1.0.
14:10:28 <ShaneM> s/XHTML/ARIA/
14:11:13 <Tina> We should be extra careful with inherited techniques, and only include them in a standard if they are also good ideas.
14:11:37 <ShaneM> Roland: perhaps we could specify some "pure roles" in the XHTML Role superior vocabulary so that we can be more forward looking while the ARIA values are designed to help their marketplace.
14:14:04 <ShaneM> ShaneM: The group agreed at the last f2f to include the values in the vocabulary space.  We did not put any conditions on how those values would be included.
14:14:51 <ShaneM> markbirbeck: points out that role values are not inherited  becuase there was no role attribute.  What we have is a need to map values to legacy implementations to support them. 
14:15:13 <ShaneM> Roland: There is clearly work to do here.  We need a complete list.
14:15:23 <Tina> If they make sense, yes. We shouldn't do so just because they exist. This is important.
14:16:08 <ShaneM> oedipus: If there is a disconnect about what we agreed with the PFWG?
14:17:01 <ShaneM> Roland: We deferred to the ARIA guys saying "you define what you would like in the vocabulary, and we will put them into the space".  oedipus agrees that is what the understanding was.
14:17:29 <ShaneM> Roland: The issue is that the lists are somewhat disjoint - they don't look like they were produced by the same group of people.
14:17:48 <ShaneM> oedipus: I volunteer to work with whomoever on this.  I am in both groups.
14:18:33 <ShaneM> Roland: A separate interesting topic is how do we manage vocabularies in general...  
14:18:42 <ShaneM> TOPIC: Managing CURIE Vocabularies
14:19:15 <ShaneM> Roland: definition for values of @rel/@rev 
14:19:28 <ShaneM> Roland: There is some IETF work in this space.  And the HTML 5 group seems to be looking at it too.
14:20:47 <Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Apr/0013.html
14:21:03 <ShaneM> TAG work on sem web data in HTTP headers - the LINK header
14:21:50 <ShaneM> There needs to be a way of managing the collection of values that go into a vocabulary so we don't end up with a mess.
14:22:38 <ShaneM> ShaneM: What about CURIEs - doesn't that help?
14:22:55 <ShaneM> Roland: Not really because there needs to be agreement on basic semantics so vocabularies get used.
14:23:56 <Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Apr/0026.html
14:23:59 <ShaneM> The Math WG is trying to ensure that the entity collection is consistent among all groups that care.
14:24:30 <ShaneM> We absolutely care about the collection of entities, since XHTML 1 / 1.1 / 2 all define consistent collections today.
14:25:06 <ShaneM> ACTION: Shane to ensure there are no inconsistencies between the MathML entity set and the XHTML entity set.
14:25:33 <Steven-eee> I seem to remember we did/tried to do just that long ago
14:25:38 <ShaneM> oedipus: It is not clear that the HTML 5 group has actually made any changes in that space.
14:26:05 <Steven-eee> I remember long discussions about values of entities being used in MathML
14:26:53 <Steven-eee> (where is Masaysu when you need hime)
14:26:53 <ShaneM> ShaneM: There should be consistency, but I am sure that we already addressed this years ago.
14:27:08 <Steven-eee> s/hime/him/
14:27:12 <Steven-eee> ok
14:29:15 <ShaneM> ShaneM: we have the definitivbe collection as part of M12N, and we harmonized that with the MathML collection.  But we do not defer to them 'cause our collection is the base definition for the web.
14:30:17 <ShaneM> oedipus: Will check with the PFWG, but he is pretty sure that AT vendors rely upon these definitions too.  I will try to get confirmation.
14:30:57 <ShaneM> Roland: is there something we should be doing with @rel values too?
14:31:38 <markbirbeck> <link rel="license" ... />
14:31:38 <markbirbeck>   <l ink rel="[foaf:knows]" ... />
14:32:44 <markbirbeck> s/l ink/link/
14:33:10 <ShaneM> Roland: What would happen if we do not harmonize?
14:33:48 <ShaneM> markbirbeck: there is some risk, but RDFa has a lot of momentum so it is likely XHTML / RDFa will dominate.
14:34:24 <Steven-eee> shouldn' that be <link rel="foaf:knows" ...?
14:34:28 <Steven-eee> No need for [] in rel
14:35:17 <ShaneM> Mark was pointing out that there was an alternate potential syntax historically.
14:35:43 <ShaneM> markbirbeck: we should make it so important @rel values are in the vocabulary and coordinate with these other groups.
14:36:27 <ShaneM> ACTION: Shane and Mark should open up this dialog and see if we can't get the other @rel people to come play with us
14:37:16 <ShaneM> TOPIC: XHTML-Access Module
14:38:07 <ShaneM> oedipus: Other groups that have seen the access module are looking for mappings to specific APIs.
14:38:35 <ShaneM> ARIA Provides appendices about mapping ARIA stuff to APIs.
14:39:13 <ShaneM> Roland: Access is not primarily about assistive technology.  It is there to support the mobile community too.
14:40:22 <ShaneM> oedipus: True.  But from the point of view of AT people how to cascade the access effects portably among implementations.
14:41:41 <ShaneM> ShaneM: there's nothing in the access module to bind to.  It is only useful in conjunction with the XML Event module (and XML Handlers).
14:42:04 <ShaneM> Perhaps there is some baggage associated with this in the accessibility community.
14:42:16 <ShaneM> People are looking for cascade rules.
14:42:37 <ShaneM> ACTION: Gregory to ensure that we get feedback about needing cascade rules in xhtml-access
14:43:42 <Zakim> -ShaneM
14:43:43 <Zakim> -markbirbeck
14:43:44 <Zakim> -Gregory_Rosmaita
14:43:44 <Zakim> -??P5
14:43:46 <Zakim> -Roland
14:43:46 <Zakim> IA_XHTML2()9:45AM has ended
14:43:47 <Zakim> Attendees were Roland, ShaneM, markbirbeck, Gregory_Rosmaita
14:44:04 <yamx> ??P5 is yamx
14:44:10 <Roland> rrsagent, make minutes
14:44:10 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/09-xhtml-minutes.html Roland
14:45:03 <RolandMerrick> RolandMerrick has joined #xhtml
14:45:14 <RolandMerrick> Regrets: Alessio
14:45:36 <Roland> Zakim, list
14:45:36 <Zakim> I see I18N_CoreWG()10:00AM, Team_W3M()8:00AM, HTML_Forms()10:45AM active
14:45:39 <Zakim> also scheduled at this time are SW_GRDDL()11:00AM, SW_SWEO()10:00AM, RWC_WAPI()10:30AM, XML_Core()11:00AM, SEC_WSCWG()11:00AM, MM_MMI(dialog)11:00AM
14:46:33 <RolandMerrick> Present: Roland, Shane, Mark, Gregory, Yam, Steven(IRC), Tina (IRC)
14:46:44 <RolandMerrick> Scribe: ShaneM
14:46:58 <Roland> rrsagent, make minutes
14:46:58 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/09-xhtml-minutes.html Roland
14:47:46 <Roland> rrsagent, publish minutes
14:47:46 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/09-xhtml-minutes.html Roland
14:48:10 <RolandMerrick> zakim, please part
14:48:10 <Zakim> Zakim has left #xhtml
14:48:28 <RolandMerrick> rrsagent, please part
14:48:28 <RRSAgent> I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/09-xhtml-actions.rdf :
14:48:28 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Shane to ensure there are no inconsistencies between the MathML entity set and the XHTML entity set. [1]
14:48:28 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/09-xhtml-irc#T14-25-06
14:48:28 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Shane and Mark should open up this dialog and see if we can't get the other @rel people to come play with us [2]
14:48:28 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/09-xhtml-irc#T14-36-27
14:48:28 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Gregory to ensure that we get feedback about needing cascade rules in xhtml-access [3]
14:48:28 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/09-xhtml-irc#T14-42-37