14:57:00 RRSAgent has joined #databinding 14:57:00 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/03/25-databinding-irc 14:57:02 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:57:02 Zakim has joined #databinding 14:57:04 Zakim, this will be DBWG 14:57:04 ok, trackbot-ng, I see WS_DBWG()10:00AM already started 14:57:05 Meeting: XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Working Group Teleconference 14:57:05 Date: 25 March 2008 14:58:26 JonC has joined #databinding 14:59:57 +Yves 15:01:23 pauld has joined #databinding 15:01:47 trackbot-ng, start meeting 15:01:49 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:01:51 Zakim, this will be DBWG 15:01:51 ok, trackbot-ng, I see WS_DBWG()10:00AM already started 15:01:52 Meeting: XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Working Group Teleconference 15:01:52 Date: 25 March 2008 15:02:01 zakim, code 15:02:01 I don't understand 'code', pauld 15:02:03 zakim, code? 15:02:03 the conference code is 3294 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), pauld 15:02:46 zakim, who is on the call? 15:02:46 On the phone I see MarkS, +0800328aaaa, Yves 15:03:02 zakim, marks is really gcowe 15:03:02 +gcowe; got it 15:03:15 zakim, aaaa is JonC 15:03:15 +JonC; got it 15:06:02 yeah, still holding for an operator :( 15:07:00 -JonC 15:07:48 looks like i'm the only on this call!! 15:07:58 I have had to dial in again as well 15:08:03 zakim, who is on the call? 15:08:03 On the phone I see gcowe, Yves 15:08:05 yep, let's all leave 15:08:09 -Yves 15:08:12 ok 15:08:16 WS_DBWG()10:00AM has ended 15:08:18 Attendees were +0800328aaaa, Yves, gcowe, JonC 15:08:24 ok, Yves; conference Team_(databinding)15:08Z scheduled with code 26631 (CONF1) for 60 minutes until 1608Z; however, please note that capacity is now overbooked 15:08:40 Team_(databinding)15:08Z has now started 15:08:41 +Yves 15:09:39 +JonC 15:09:40 -JonC 15:09:40 +JonC 15:09:56 + +0791888aaaa 15:10:19 zakim, who is on the call? 15:10:19 On the phone I see Yves, JonC, PaulD 15:11:04 +gcowe 15:11:48 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2008Mar/0014.html 15:11:59 Topic: Admistrivia 15:12:09 minutes from 18th approved 15:15:22 Topic: Publication 15:15:58 gcowe: we shouldn't have directories with "edcopy" in the URI 15:16:08 scribe: pauld 15:17:30 pauld: we'll take a snapshot of the collection and testsuite report and publish when we go to the Director for PR 15:17:58 pauld: believe I have completed the editing for Last Call 15:18:31 jonc: what about "Block Default"? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2008Mar/0015.html 15:19:01 pauld: also George points out that NonIdentifierPattern is still basic 15:19:26 pauld: document here: http://localhost/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/basic/basic.html 15:21:09 yves: we need to highlight moving directly to PR in the status section 15:21:12 pauld: done! 15:21:34 Topic: blockDefault 15:22:40 jonc: it's an innocuous default pattern 15:24:07 pauld: we have a statement in the status section about not introducing new elements and attributes 15:24:23 pauld: have you tested them? "./@blockDefault and not(./@blockDefault)" looks strange 15:26:18 gcowe: happy with the first option, seems an unusual thing to do 15:26:45 pauld: there is precedence, e.g nillable 15:28:08 jonc: and we have others globalComplexTypeBlock and globalElementBlock 15:30:49 pauld: this seems better ./xs:element[@block=""]/(@block) 15:34:51 gcowe: blockDefault and finalDefault have been skipped on all of the tools 15:35:19 pauld: can we move these to advanced? 15:35:30 gcowe: we don't have much evidence 15:36:07 jonc: doesn't seem dangerous, but without testing .. 15:36:34 gcowe: we don't use it, and my guess is if we test this it'll be advanced 15:39:35 RESOLUTION: move GlobalComplexTypeBlock, GlobalElementFinal, GlobalElementBlock to advanced 15:40:39 Topic: NonIdentifierName 15:40:55 gcowe: we're hitting this due to names longer than 32 15:41:07 pauld: we discussed this under ISSUE-10 15:41:26 gcowe: we don't have very good examples in this area 15:42:03 pauld: we should add some more tests 15:43:45 pauld: we could split the pattern to be "symbolic name" and "long symbolic name" 15:44:30 ISSUE 10 discussed in this thread 15:44:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0002.html 15:45:47 gcowe: 31 is the magic number 15:46:46 pauld: worried, because we're sure non-ASCII names is an issue, but the length? 15:47:46 pauld: let's create some examples 15:48:40 JonC has joined #databinding 15:49:56 gcowe: worried by the number of examples in this area 15:50:11 pauld: we could create a little test suite for this alone 15:52:22 gcowe: we've tried long names in C# and Java without issues, but obviously C might .. 15:52:32 pauld: OK we'll work on this 15:53:36 Topic: Detection Service 15:54:09 gcowe: thinking about adding highlighting, also been thinking about rerunning test suite 15:55:56 Topic: Last Call 15:56:14 pauld: we're mostly done 15:56:24 yves: links to Test Suite and Collection? 15:56:42 pauld: will do son 15:56:46 s/son/so/ 15:57:59 ADJOURNED 15:58:24 -PaulD 15:58:25 -JonC 15:58:25 -Yves 15:58:27 pauld: pickup in two weeks 15:58:29 -gcowe 15:58:30 Team_(databinding)15:08Z has ended 15:58:31 Attendees were Yves, JonC, +0791888aaaa, PaulD, gcowe 15:58:35 rrsagent, generate minutes 15:58:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/03/25-databinding-minutes.html pauld 15:58:44 rrsagent make logs public 15:58:52 rrsagent, make logs public 17:31:21 Zakim has left #databinding