IRC log of rdfa on 2008-02-28
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:31:01 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdfa
- 15:31:01 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/02/28-rdfa-irc
- 15:31:09 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rdfa
- 15:31:22 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 15:31:29 [Steven]
- zakim, this will be rdfa
- 15:31:29 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM scheduled to start in 29 minutes
- 15:31:50 [Steven]
- Meeting: Weekly RDFa TF Teleconference
- 15:31:54 [Steven]
- Chair: Ben
- 15:31:56 [Steven]
- SCribe: Steven
- 15:32:00 [Steven]
- s/SC/Sc/
- 15:33:25 [Steven]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0144
- 15:33:32 [Steven]
- Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0144
- 15:34:00 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:34:00 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/02/28-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
- 15:34:39 [Steven]
- -> Previous http://www.w3.org/2008/02/21-rdfa-minutes.html
- 15:34:46 [Steven]
- -> Previous http://www.w3.org/2008/02/21-rdfa-minutes.html
- 15:34:54 [Steven]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2008/02/21-rdfa-minutes.html Previous
- 15:34:59 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:34:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/02/28-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
- 15:37:11 [Steven]
- Regrets: Michael
- 15:48:56 [msporny]
- msporny has joined #rdfa
- 16:01:30 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has now started
- 16:01:37 [Zakim]
- +ShaneM
- 16:01:44 [ShaneM]
- eager beaver
- 16:01:51 [msporny]
- =P
- 16:01:53 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 16:01:53 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 16:01:54 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 16:01:55 [markbirbeck]
- markbirbeck has joined #rdfa
- 16:02:05 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, codes?
- 16:02:05 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, markbirbeck.
- 16:02:10 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, code?
- 16:02:10 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck
- 16:02:13 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 16:02:28 [Zakim]
- +??P6
- 16:02:35 [Ralph]
- Ralph has joined #rdfa
- 16:02:43 [Zakim]
- +??P8
- 16:02:47 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, i am p8
- 16:02:47 [Zakim]
- sorry, markbirbeck, I do not see a party named 'p8'
- 16:02:53 [msporny]
- zakim, I am ??P6
- 16:02:53 [Zakim]
- +msporny; got it
- 16:02:55 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, i am ?p8
- 16:02:55 [Zakim]
- sorry, markbirbeck, I do not see a party named '?p8'
- 16:03:04 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, i am ??P8
- 16:03:04 [Zakim]
- +markbirbeck; got it
- 16:04:32 [Zakim]
- +benadida
- 16:04:38 [benadida]
- benadida has joined #rdfa
- 16:05:29 [benadida]
- zakim, who's on the call?
- 16:05:29 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ShaneM, Steven, Ralph, msporny, markbirbeck, benadida
- 16:05:55 [Steven]
- Topic: Actions
- 16:06:46 [Ralph]
- yay Manu, Shane, & Mark!
- 16:07:04 [Steven]
- Ben: THanks all for what you did when I was away
- 16:07:08 [Steven]
- s/TH/Th/
- 16:07:36 [Steven]
- [NEW] ACTION: Manu create unit test to make sure that rel=":foo" generates a triple. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/21-rdfa-minutes.html#action07]
- 16:07:48 [Steven]
- --done
- 16:09:36 [Ralph]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221/#s_xhtmlrdfa
- 16:09:53 [Ralph]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221/#col_Metainformation
- 16:10:09 [ShaneM]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_metaAttributes
- 16:10:37 [Steven]
- Mark: I think part of the test is wrong
- 16:10:47 [Steven]
- Manu: We'll review it later
- 16:10:58 [Steven]
- [NEW] ACTION: Manu let Michael know that Test 76, 77, and 87 are missing stylesheet. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/21-rdfa-minutes.html#action08]
- 16:11:08 [Steven]
- --done
- 16:11:09 [Steven]
- [NEW] ACTION: Manu write a response to Christian Hoertnagl for issue 7 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/21-rdfa-minutes.html#action09]
- 16:11:13 [Steven]
- --continues
- 16:11:41 [Steven]
- Ben: Pass it back to me if you want
- 16:11:43 [Steven]
- [PENDING] ACTION: Ben followup with Fabien on getting his RDFa GRDDL transform transferred to W3C [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action01]
- 16:11:59 [Steven]
- --continues
- 16:12:02 [Steven]
- [PENDING] ACTION: Ben to add status of various implementations on rdfa.info [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/04-rdfa-minutes.html#action06]
- 16:12:07 [Steven]
- --continues
- 16:12:14 [Steven]
- [PENDING] ACTION: Ben to email mailing list to think about last substantive issue on tracker: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/6 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/07-rdfa-minutes.html#action07]
- 16:12:28 [Steven]
- Ben: Maintaining xml:lang on some literals?
- 16:12:31 [Steven]
- -- continues
- 16:12:37 [Steven]
- [PENDING] ACTION: Manu write 2 new tests for img[@src] as subject [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/31-rdfa-minutes.html#action08]
- 16:12:39 [Steven]
- --done
- 16:12:47 [Steven]
- [PENDING] ACTION: Michael to create "Microformats done right -- unambiguous taxonomies via RDF" on the wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/23-rdfa-minutes.html#action06]
- 16:12:52 [Steven]
- --continues
- 16:14:10 [Ralph]
- Steven: I do recommend that people read the post with the SXSW dinner proposal -- it talks about microformats
- 16:16:28 [Steven]
- Ben: Digg really want to do RDFa!
- 16:16:37 [Steven]
- ... will be there in a couple of weeks
- 16:21:14 [Steven]
- Topic: Test Case Status
- 16:21:30 [Steven]
- Manu: We have 6 outstanding tests
- 16:21:32 [msporny]
- http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/
- 16:22:42 [Ralph]
- -- test 84; multiple ways of handling incomplete triples, this time with both @rel and @re
- 16:23:37 [Steven]
- s/and @re/and @rev/
- 16:24:43 [Steven]
- Ben: Looks OK
- 16:25:08 [Steven]
- Mark: Fine
- 16:25:09 [Steven]
- Manu: Mee too
- 16:25:15 [Steven]
- s/Mee/Me/
- 16:25:31 [Steven]
- RESOLUTION: Test 84 is OK
- 16:25:41 [Steven]
- Manu: Test 85
- 16:25:53 [Steven]
- ... @resource and @href in completing incomplete triples
- 16:26:59 [Steven]
- ... this passes all three implementations
- 16:27:30 [benadida]
- <a href="o" property="p">xxx</a>
- 16:27:48 [benadida]
- o p "xxx" .
- 16:28:06 [benadida]
- <a rel="p2" href="o" property="p">xxx</a>.
- 16:28:28 [Steven]
- Ben: THis means that the subject changes
- 16:28:33 [Steven]
- s/TH/Th/
- 16:28:50 [Steven]
- ... from o to the about property
- 16:29:09 [Steven]
- Mark: Hmm, shame; that wasn't intentional
- 16:29:35 [Steven]
- ... too late to change it now
- 16:29:44 [Steven]
- Ben: At first it bothered me
- 16:29:51 [Steven]
- ... but I got used to it
- 16:30:00 [Steven]
- ... you just have to watch out
- 16:30:49 [Steven]
- Ben: The test looks good
- 16:31:02 [Steven]
- RESOLUTION: Test 85 passes
- 16:31:36 [Steven]
- Manu: Test #89 (unreviewed): @src sets a new subject (@instanceof)
- 16:32:33 [Steven]
- Manu: Passes the three implementations
- 16:32:39 [Steven]
- Ben: Does that include mine?
- 16:32:42 [Steven]
- Manu: No
- 16:33:01 [Steven]
- RESOLUTION: Test 89 passes
- 16:33:55 [Steven]
- Manu: Test #90 (unreviewed): @src sets a new subject (@rel/@href)
- 16:35:18 [Steven]
- Mark: Is "next" good here?
- 16:35:21 [Steven]
- Steven: I like it
- 16:35:34 [Steven]
- Mark: Or @resource instead of @href
- 16:35:54 [Steven]
- Manu: Well, this one works
- 16:36:24 [Steven]
- Ralph: Mark is talking about best practices
- 16:36:51 [Steven]
- Mark: rel="alternate" might be better
- 16:37:18 [Steven]
- ... or rel="licence"
- 16:37:25 [Steven]
- Ben: I like it!
- 16:37:45 [Steven]
- RESOLUTION: Test 90 to be modified as above
- 16:38:18 [Steven]
- Mark: Ben, is rel="licence"equivalent to cc:licence
- 16:38:22 [Steven]
- Ben: We do support it
- 16:38:44 [Steven]
- ... we may want to make xhtml:licence a subclass of dc:licence
- 16:40:23 [Steven]
- RESOLUTION: Test 9 0is accepted with the changes
- 16:40:30 [Steven]
- s/ 0/0 /
- 16:40:43 [Steven]
- [end of test for this week]
- 16:40:56 [Steven]
- Mark: If you change it to cc:licence, then I support @href here
- 16:41:06 [Ralph]
- s/the changes/changes to @rel="license" and @href="<some CC license>"/
- 16:41:07 [Steven]
- ... so it can be a clickable link
- 16:41:57 [Ralph]
- -> http://rdfa.info/2008/02/23/yahoo-microsearch-supports-rdfa/ Yahoo Microsearch supports RDFa
- 16:44:44 [Steven]
- Topic: Yahoo
- 16:44:52 [Steven]
- Steven: See the rdfa.info blog
- 16:45:03 [Steven]
- ... Yahoo supporting RDFa, pretty neat
- 16:45:23 [Steven]
- ... Micah Dubinko has been talking to me for sometime about RDFa, but I didn't realise why
- 16:45:28 [Steven]
- Topic: Issues
- 16:45:43 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/87
- 16:46:18 [Steven]
- Ben: There is an old use of src
- 16:46:24 [Steven]
- ... I think the fix is obvious
- 16:46:33 [Steven]
- ... move the relto the parent div
- 16:46:39 [Steven]
- s/rel/rel /
- 16:47:48 [Steven]
- Shane: We need to track if each change is editorial or substantive
- 16:47:58 [Steven]
- ... it doesn't change the spec
- 16:48:05 [Steven]
- ... it was a typo
- 16:48:20 [Steven]
- ... though it is in a normative section
- 16:48:32 [Steven]
- Shane: All examples though are informative
- 16:49:15 [Steven]
- ... remember that substantive changes might trigger a new last call
- 16:49:55 [Steven]
- s/... it doesn't/Ben: It doesn't/
- 16:50:51 [Steven]
- ACTION: Ben to respond to issue 87
- 16:51:02 [Steven]
- Ben Issue 88
- 16:51:08 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/88
- 16:51:14 [Steven]
- s/Ben/Ben: /
- 16:51:37 [Steven]
- Mark: Just requires to reorder the three bullets
- 16:51:47 [Steven]
- ... I moved the third to the top
- 16:51:54 [Steven]
- ... wihtout changing the wording
- 16:52:01 [Steven]
- s/wiht/with/
- 16:53:12 [Steven]
- Ralph: This looks substantive
- 16:53:44 [Steven]
- Mark: If you take all three rules together, the intent is clear
- 16:54:00 [Steven]
- ... it depends if you take them as steps or rules
- 16:54:54 [Ralph]
- s/substantive/substantive if it's not otherwise clear what we intended/
- 16:54:56 [Steven]
- Ben: This is just a clarification of our intent
- 16:55:08 [Steven]
- Steven: Which is not strictly substantive
- 16:55:25 [Steven]
- ACTION: Mark to reply and process issue 88
- 16:56:00 [Steven]
- Ben: let us do other by mail, since we have other topics for today
- 16:56:07 [Steven]
- s/other/others/
- 16:56:25 [Steven]
- Topic: Implementation Report and Status
- 16:57:09 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0123.html "[RDFa Implementation Report] Using EARL?" [Michael 2008-02-27]
- 16:57:09 [Steven]
- Ben: An implementation report is just "here are a bunch of implementations, and they pass the tests?
- 16:57:16 [Steven]
- s/?/'?"/
- 16:57:27 [Steven]
- Steven: Yes
- 16:57:46 [Steven]
- Ralph: We don't have to list all implementations we know
- 16:57:51 [Steven]
- Steven: Two is enough
- 16:57:55 [Steven]
- Shane: We are already done
- 16:58:09 [Steven]
- Ralph: Nice to have some outside the TF though
- 16:58:24 [Steven]
- Ben: Michael seems to have this in hand
- 16:58:32 [Steven]
- hand
- 16:58:35 [Steven]
- q-
- 16:59:50 [Steven]
- Ben: The primer needs a review and update
- 17:00:06 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/ RDFa Primer
- 17:00:17 [Ralph]
- Steven: I've heard people ask for a cookbook
- 17:00:27 [Ralph]
- ... showing how to do vCard, etc.
- 17:00:36 [Steven]
- Ben: Do it on the wiki
- 17:00:54 [Steven]
- Steven: That would work
- 17:00:58 [Ralph]
- [I support doing cookbook examples via wiki]
- 17:01:22 [Steven]
- Ben: I'm happy working on the primer
- 17:01:30 [Steven]
- ... but please join me if you want
- 17:01:37 [Ralph]
- q+ to ask about editors' draft
- 17:03:08 [Steven]
- i/Ben: The primer/Topic: Primer/
- 17:03:29 [Steven]
- ack r
- 17:03:29 [Zakim]
- Ralph, you wanted to ask about editors' draft
- 17:03:57 [Steven]
- Ralph: We need a quick update so that it matches the last call
- 17:04:05 [ShaneM]
- +1
- 17:04:07 [Steven]
- ... improvements can come later
- 17:04:27 [Ralph]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xhtml-rdfa-primer-20071026/
- 17:05:31 [Steven]
- Ben: That's the most revent version
- 17:05:39 [Steven]
- s/revent/recent/
- 17:05:42 [Ralph]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa
- 17:06:02 [benadida]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/
- 17:06:37 [Steven]
- ACTION: Ben to update the primer
- 17:10:20 [Steven]
- [ADJOURN]
- 17:10:55 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:10:55 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/02/28-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
- 17:10:59 [Zakim]
- -msporny
- 17:11:00 [Zakim]
- -markbirbeck
- 17:11:23 [Steven]
- zakim, list participants
- 17:11:23 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been ShaneM, Steven, Ralph, msporny, markbirbeck, benadida
- 17:11:29 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:11:29 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/02/28-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
- 17:18:26 [Zakim]
- -ShaneM
- 17:18:48 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 17:30:52 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 17:30:54 [Zakim]
- -benadida
- 17:30:55 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has ended
- 17:30:56 [Zakim]
- Attendees were ShaneM, Steven, Ralph, msporny, markbirbeck, benadida
- 19:09:04 [Ralph]
- zakim, bye
- 19:09:04 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rdfa
- 19:09:46 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, bye
- 19:09:46 [RRSAgent]
- I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/28-rdfa-actions.rdf :
- 19:09:46 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to respond to issue 87 [1]
- 19:09:46 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/28-rdfa-irc#T16-50-51
- 19:09:46 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Mark to reply and process issue 88 [2]
- 19:09:46 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/28-rdfa-irc#T16-55-25
- 19:09:46 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to update the primer [3]
- 19:09:46 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/28-rdfa-irc#T17-06-37