12:06:16 RRSAgent has joined #waf 12:06:16 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/02/14-waf-irc 12:07:41 I'm in Lyon and I'm having troubles in connecting via phone to the bridge... 12:08:00 roamin pains, I'm trying... 12:08:27 ok. with Marcos not present we will not have a formal meeting :-( 12:08:41 should we reschedule for another day, then? 12:09:25 Would be nice for me... 12:09:28 Scribe: Art 12:09:33 ScribeNick: ArtB 12:09:36 Chair: Art 12:09:45 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-appformats/2008Feb/0006.html 12:10:02 Present: Art, Arve, Benoit, Dave, Claudio (IRC) 12:10:13 Meeting: Widgets Voice Conf (WAF WG) 12:10:20 Date: 14 February 2008 12:10:26 Topic: Agenda Review 12:10:45 AB: without Marcos we won't do a deep dive on technical discussions 12:11:50 Topic: Annoncements 12:12:17 AB: I was hoping MikeSmith or Shepazu could provide an update on the WebApps WG Charter 12:12:25 ... but neither is present :-( 12:12:39 Topic: Actions and Issues 12:12:57 AB: see http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/ 12:13:14 ABe: regarding Action #112, we have a proposal 12:13:31 ... http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/actions/112 12:14:03 ... hope to submit it to the WG after I return from vacation at the end of the month 12:14:34 DP: is the model for Widgets connecting to the Web or does it also include accessing device APIs? 12:14:55 ABe: I can't talk about device related things 12:15:15 ... but this model is about provisioning widgets i.e. uploading and downloading 12:15:25 ... it describes a detailed URI-based model 12:17:14 AB: we have about 12 Actions open 12:17:57 marcos has joined #waf 12:18:07 AB: and we have about 5 Issues open 12:18:28 Argh! 12:18:30 coming! 12:18:34 got stuck in traffic 12:19:16 yep 12:19:25 bbiam 12:20:18 (needed more coffee) 12:20:41 +??P4 12:20:51 zakim, ??P4 is Marcos 12:20:51 +Marcos; got it 12:24:17 MC: I am working on some of the Actions 12:24:27 ... input at anytime from people is welcome 12:25:38 Topic: Landscape Document 12:25:50 AB: what's the status Marcos? 12:26:22 MC: it fullfills a need to understand the current landscape 12:26:38 ... seems logical to move it out of the Requirements document 12:27:07 ... also makes the Reqs doc easier to maintain 12:27:16 AB: I like this organization 12:27:51 http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-land/Overview.src.html 12:28:06 BS: I think the split makes sense 12:28:33 ... not sure about the title regarding the precedence in the W3C 12:29:00 MC: any help with filling in the empty boxes would be appreciated 12:29:57 AB: it may be more appropriate to be WG Note rather than a Rec type doc 12:30:01 MC: that's OK with me 12:30:12 ABe: WG Note is a good way to go 12:30:15 BS: OK with me 12:30:39 ... are any of the WG members providing information for this doc? 12:31:07 ... e.g. I noticed something regarding Windows signature ma not be accurate 12:31:17 MC: we've had some Members review but not all 12:31:29 s/ma not/may not/ 12:32:25 AB: what's the next step toward publication? 12:32:55 MC: I think we'll need about one month to fill in the tables and to get a good format 12:33:26 AB: I think WG Notes are mainly considered 1-time publication 12:34:02 ... not revised generally 12:34:32 ACTION: Barstow talk to Mike Smith about WG Note vs Rec type doc for the Landscape doc 12:34:32 Created ACTION-170 - Talk to Mike Smith about WG Note vs Rec type doc for the Landscape doc [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-02-21]. 12:36:02 BS: could wait for final pub to the end 12:38:15 claudio has joined #waf 12:38:46 Topic: Requirements doc 12:39:08 http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-reqs/ 12:39:15 ooops 12:39:20 AB: latest ED is: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/ 12:41:38 AB: Dave, please send your Feb 10 comments to the public mail list 12:41:42 DP: OK, will do 12:42:54 AB: remind everyone we need to respond to all comments whether the comments are from WG members or non-members 12:43:06 MC: I will respond to Dave's comments 12:44:07 MC: regarding Dave's first comment, it's good to hear Arve is working on a related input 12:44:28 ... On Feb 4 I sent some comments re security 12:44:47 ... Regarding device security, I'm waiting to see what the UWA WG is going to do 12:45:38 ... I agree device API has security-related implications but it's not clear if we need to do anything here (in a normative way) 12:46:08 DP: yes, that seems OK with me for v1.0 and focus now on the packaging format as the #1 priority 12:47:04 TI thinks We hould move a little further saying that Widgets support DCCI specification 12:47:52 BS: I agree about the priority of the packaging format but device API are important 12:47:58 DP: what about timeframes? 12:48:09 MC: I'd like to get to LC by November 12:48:20 ... and Candidate in 1Q09 12:48:42 ... but it all depends on WG participation and I'm concerned about the lack of inputs 12:49:07 ... we've lost some steam and we need to get it back 12:51:32 AB: I agree with MC that we have to get some more momentum; the AC work has domintate my time and I'm sorry about that 12:51:57 ... We can work in either mode -> VCs once per week or more distributed using e-mail like the AC work 12:52:14 BS: can we get more Members participating? 12:52:27 ... e.g. Microsoft or Apple 12:52:43 ... I also talked with Netvibes people 12:53:02 MC: everyone is in the WG but they aren't all participating 12:53:22 ABe: we've made most progress in the f2f meeting 12:53:28 I can report a potential interest also from Alcatel Lucent 12:53:52 ... maybe we can explicity invite Apple, MS, NetVibes, to our f2f meeting 12:54:14 DP: I think if we complete the Reqs doc it can be used to entice people to participate 12:54:55 BS: some people don't understand if this work is for Web widgets only, Desktop widgets only, etc. 12:55:03 ... this needs to be more clear 12:55:41 ... Perhaps we need an inclusive f2f meeting or some type of web cast 12:56:28 DP: I think some of the reqs are a bit "woolly" 12:56:43 ... agree we need the definition of Widgets must be very clear 12:58:02 Topic: AOB 12:58:10 AB: VC next week? 12:58:18 ABe: I would prefer two weeks from now 12:58:22 BS: that's OK with me 12:59:04 AB: next meeting Feb 28 12:59:14 MC: please send comments to the public mail list 12:59:48 BS: please include [widgets] in the Subject: header 13:00:41 BS: agree focusing the agenda on specific text or reqs would be good 13:00:50 ABe: agree 13:00:53 Are We booking a date for next F2F? 13:02:02 -DaveP 13:02:05 -Benoit 13:02:06 -arve 13:02:27 Zakim, who is here? 13:02:28 On the phone I see Art_Barstow, Marcos 13:02:32 On IRC I see claudio, marcos, RRSAgent, arve, Zakim, ArtB, shepazu, Lachy, tlr, Hixie, anne, mikko, dino, trackbot-ng 13:02:43 AB: meeting adjourned 13:03:14 ACTION: Barstow start a thread about a Widgets f2f meeting via the member mail list 13:03:14 Created ACTION-171 - Start a thread about a Widgets f2f meeting via the member mail list [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-02-21]. 13:03:21 RRSAgent, make minutes 13:03:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/02/14-waf-minutes.html ArtB 13:03:41 RRSAgent, make log public 13:06:33 Present: Art, Arve, Benoit, Dave, Claudio (IRC), Marcos 13:07:01 too bad I missed the meeting 13:07:19 RRSAgent, make log public 13:22:10 -Art_Barstow 13:22:12 -Marcos 13:22:13 IA_WAF()7:00AM has ended 13:22:14 Attendees were +44.777.177.aaaa, Art_Barstow, Benoit, arve, DaveP, Marcos 13:25:32 shepazu, can you add Marcos' name to the Present: list of http://www.w3.org/2008/02/14-waf-minutes.html 13:49:10 tlr, can you add Marcos' name to the Present: list of http://www.w3.org/2008/02/14-waf-minutes.html 13:49:22 MikeSmith was AWOL today :-) 14:58:50 Lachy has joined #waf 15:03:01 Zakim has left #waf 15:05:36 rrsagent bye 15:56:49 dino has left #waf 16:06:50 Lachy has joined #waf