IRC log of swd on 2008-02-12
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:55:50 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #swd
- 15:55:50 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc
- 15:55:53 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #swd
- 15:55:56 [Ralph]
- zakim, this will be swd
- 15:55:56 [Zakim]
- ok, Ralph, I see SW_SWD()11:00AM already started
- 15:56:00 [Ralph]
- zakim, who's on the call?
- 15:56:00 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ??P1
- 15:56:21 [Ralph]
- +Tom
- 15:56:36 [Ralph]
- Meeting: SWD WG
- 15:56:56 [Quentin]
- Quentin has joined #swd
- 15:56:56 [Ralph]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0041.html
- 15:57:13 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 15:57:24 [Zakim]
- +??P5
- 15:57:30 [ed]
- ed has joined #swd
- 15:57:32 [msporny]
- zakim, I am ??P5
- 15:57:32 [Zakim]
- +msporny; got it
- 15:57:50 [Zakim]
- + +0122427aaaa
- 15:58:08 [Ralph]
- zakim, aaaa is Quentin
- 15:58:08 [Zakim]
- +Quentin; got it
- 15:58:16 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, please make record public
- 15:58:39 [TomB]
- Regrets: Jon, Michael, Daniel, Elisa, Clay
- 15:58:41 [Ralph]
- Regrets: Jon, Michael, Daniel, Clay
- 15:58:52 [TomB]
- Regrets: Jon, Michael, Daniel, Elisa, Clay
- 15:59:35 [Zakim]
- +Guus_Schreiber
- 15:59:45 [Antoine]
- Antoine has joined #swd
- 16:00:00 [vit]
- vit has joined #swd
- 16:00:26 [Alistair_Miles]
- Alistair_Miles has joined #swd
- 16:00:36 [Guus]
- Guus has joined #swd
- 16:00:40 [Zakim]
- +[LC]
- 16:00:52 [edsu]
- zakim, LC is edsu
- 16:00:52 [Zakim]
- +edsu; got it
- 16:01:39 [Zakim]
- + +31.20.420.aabb
- 16:01:53 [Antoine]
- Zakim, aabb is me
- 16:01:53 [Zakim]
- +Antoine; got it
- 16:03:01 [Zakim]
- +??P25
- 16:03:06 [Simone]
- Zakim, ??P25 is me
- 16:03:08 [vit]
- Zakim, is P25 me
- 16:03:11 [Zakim]
- +??P38
- 16:03:21 [Zakim]
- +Simone; got it
- 16:03:29 [marghe]
- marghe has joined #swd
- 16:03:33 [Zakim]
- +??P42
- 16:03:33 [Ralph]
- zakim, ??p38 is Alistair
- 16:03:39 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'is P25 me', vit
- 16:03:53 [Ralph]
- zakim, ??p25 is Vit
- 16:04:01 [Zakim]
- +Alistair; got it
- 16:04:19 [TomB]
- scribenick: Quentin
- 16:04:22 [TomB]
- Scribe: Quentin
- 16:04:27 [Ralph]
- zakim, ??p42 is Alistair
- 16:04:28 [Zakim]
- I already had ??P25 as Simone, Ralph
- 16:04:46 [Ralph]
- zakim, alistair is really Vit
- 16:05:14 [Zakim]
- +Alistair; got it
- 16:05:16 [Zakim]
- +??P53
- 16:05:17 [Ralph]
- zakim, ??p53 is Margherita
- 16:05:36 [Zakim]
- +Vit; got it
- 16:05:37 [Quentin]
- Topic: Admin
- 16:05:54 [Quentin]
- PROPOSED to accept minutes of the Feb 5 telecon:
- 16:05:58 [Quentin]
- RESOLVED
- 16:06:05 [Zakim]
- +Margherita; got it
- 16:06:07 [Quentin]
- Next telecon on Feb 19th
- 16:06:17 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Chairs to put schedule review on agenda [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action24]
- 16:06:20 [Quentin]
- --continues
- 16:06:36 [Quentin]
- Topic: RDFa
- 16:07:05 [Quentin]
- Tom says that we should have reviewed RDFa before submitting but
- 16:07:28 [Quentin]
- ...needing an email from the authors before the submission takes place
- 16:07:31 [berrueta]
- berrueta has joined #swd
- 16:07:55 [msporny]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0019.html
- 16:08:12 [Quentin]
- Guus informs it's not a submission problem, but it should be a note from the authors highlighting how the different review comments have been integrated
- 16:08:32 [Quentin]
- ...link to comments required
- 16:08:54 [Quentin]
- Tom says need an updated draft and response point before going any further
- 16:09:04 [edsu]
- there was also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0027.html
- 16:09:11 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
- 16:09:15 [Quentin]
- --continues
- 16:09:24 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Ben to prepare the email to request the decision for publishing on Feb 12th [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action24]
- 16:09:26 [Quentin]
- --continues
- 16:09:59 [seanb]
- seanb has joined #swd
- 16:10:23 [Zakim]
- +Rodrigo
- 16:10:31 [berrueta]
- Zakim, Rodrigo is me
- 16:10:32 [Zakim]
- +berrueta; got it
- 16:10:57 [Quentin]
- Guus prefers reviews linked to parts in the revied editor draft
- 16:11:27 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Ralph to let the task force that SWD require extended response on editor's draft
- 16:11:55 [Quentin]
- Guus mentions that response shold link to specific comments by reviewers
- 16:12:30 [Quentin]
- New extended draft could have been by yesterday
- 16:12:35 [Zakim]
- +??P66
- 16:12:44 [seanb]
- zakim, ??P66 is seanb
- 16:12:44 [Zakim]
- +seanb; got it
- 16:12:59 [Ralph]
- s/force that/force know that/
- 16:13:39 [Quentin]
- Tom mentions that reviewers should have a look @ this response when made available
- 16:13:57 [Quentin]
- Guus say that this will be reviewed again next week
- 16:14:29 [Quentin]
- Last Thursday telecon informed that HTML2 task foce is happy with new version
- 16:14:49 [Quentin]
- s/telecon/RDFa telecon
- 16:15:52 [Quentin]
- HTML2 review is focused on different aspects than our task force (e.g. modalarity).
- 16:15:57 [Quentin]
- Topi: SKOS
- 16:16:05 [Quentin]
- s/Topi/Topic
- 16:16:21 [Quentin]
- SKOS Primer
- 16:16:38 [Ralph]
- Topic: SKOS Primer
- 16:16:48 [Quentin]
- Antoine sent a mail to move forward the SKOS primer to working draft
- 16:17:07 [Quentin]
- ...reviewers to comment on the revised version
- 16:17:18 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0040.html proposal to move SKOS Primer forward
- 16:17:25 [Quentin]
- ...Margherita has given more comments on the version
- 16:17:51 [Quentin]
- Guus asked Margherita to detail comments
- 16:18:24 [Quentin]
- Margherita mentions that her comments could be implemented in next version
- 16:18:41 [Ralph]
- Quentin: some of the points Margherita raised are quite important
- 16:18:53 [Ralph]
- ... especially moving to Turtle syntax
- 16:19:24 [Ralph]
- ... Antoine noted 4 points to consider but none should hold up publication of WD
- 16:19:59 [Ralph]
- Antoine: regarding Turtle vs. N3, the problem is just that the examples cited N3 but really only used Turtle
- 16:20:05 [Ralph]
- ... the latest editors' draft fixes this
- 16:20:21 [Ralph]
- Quentin: ok, then I agree this can be released as a WD
- 16:20:53 [aliman]
- +1
- 16:20:53 [edsu]
- Ralph++
- 16:20:57 [Ralph]
- Ralph: publishing should be like voting -- do it early and often :)
- 16:21:37 [Zakim]
- -Guus_Schreiber
- 16:21:39 [edsu]
- Ralph: diebold makes it so much easier these days
- 16:21:45 [Quentin]
- RESOLUTION: SKOS Primer to be published
- 16:22:10 [Antoine]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer, 12 Feb with turtle reference
- 16:22:32 [Zakim]
- +??P11
- 16:23:00 [Quentin]
- Antoine says that the last version on the Wiki has been updated (example and Turtle)
- 16:23:01 [Guus]
- zakim, ??P11 is Guus
- 16:23:01 [Zakim]
- +Guus; got it
- 16:23:17 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer 12 Feb editor's draft
- 16:23:51 [Quentin]
- Ralph to take the 12th Feb version and go through publication process
- 16:24:20 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Ralph to publish Feb 12th version of SKOS primer as working draft
- 16:24:38 [Quentin]
- SKOS Reference
- 16:24:49 [Zakim]
- -Antoine
- 16:25:18 [Quentin]
- Tom raised a few questions wrt to deprecated properties mentioned in previous SKOS Core
- 16:25:19 [Zakim]
- +Antoine
- 16:25:23 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0004.html "SKOS Core Vocabulary of 2005 - issues" [Tom 2008-02-04]
- 16:26:16 [Quentin]
- Sean says that we can produce a RDF version relatively easily
- 16:26:33 [Quentin]
- Alistair not sure how to cover the deprecated properties from SKOS Core
- 16:26:59 [Quentin]
- Tom mentions that the SKOS Reference replaces the previous SKOS Core published in 2005
- 16:27:13 [Quentin]
- ...no mention of existing RDF
- 16:27:13 [Ralph]
- q+
- 16:27:14 [Guus]
- q+ to come back later in the agnda to RDFa (Last Call period)
- 16:27:41 [Quentin]
- Alistair says that need to create new namespace for the SKOS Reference
- 16:28:22 [Quentin]
- s/new namespace/reuse current namespace
- 16:28:44 [Quentin]
- Tom to depracate several properties not present in the current SKOS Reference
- 16:29:10 [Quentin]
- ... these might need to be dropped and hence would not appear in the RDF namespace
- 16:29:44 [Quentin]
- ... if it is ok with SKOS community this could be done but shouldn't if people using the deprecated properties
- 16:30:43 [Quentin]
- ... SKOS Reference should point to RDF schema and explains why it's out of synch
- 16:31:02 [edsu]
- q+ to ask about subject indexing
- 16:32:00 [Quentin]
- Alistair asks whether he would be happy to mention that RDF files is to be done and that schema are not in synch
- 16:32:10 [Quentin]
- Tom agrees with this proposal
- 16:32:38 [Quentin]
- Alistair to add that to the next SKOS Reference editor's draft
- 16:33:18 [Quentin]
- Ralph says that the deprecated properties should be removed from namespace
- 16:34:04 [Quentin]
- ... someone need to look @ the consequence would be to remove these deprecated properties
- 16:34:25 [Ralph]
- Ralph: if we decide that the SKOS Specification makes no mention of the old deprecated properties, then those properties should also be removed from the namespace document
- 16:34:31 [Quentin]
- ... a proposal should ber made on how to handle this
- 16:35:04 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Sean to propose a way to handle deprecated properties (Updating RDF schema)
- 16:35:21 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Alistair to make a proposal for Issue 40 (Concept Coordination) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action09]
- 16:35:24 [Quentin]
- --continues
- 16:35:32 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Alistair to propose an approach to clarify which aspects of the extension module should be in scope for the candidate recommendation package. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09]
- 16:35:36 [Quentin]
- --continues
- 16:35:46 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Alistair and Guus to check the text in the primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action13]
- 16:35:49 [Quentin]
- --continues
- 16:36:41 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action10]
- 16:37:05 [Quentin]
- --continues
- 16:37:27 [Quentin]
- Alistair keeps highlighting that this property doesn't exit anymore
- 16:37:39 [Quentin]
- s/Alistair/Ralph
- 16:37:49 [Quentin]
- Alistair concurs
- 16:38:02 [Quentin]
- SKOS Issues
- 16:38:16 [Quentin]
- Tom highlights all issues to be still looked @
- 16:38:33 [Quentin]
- ... Alistair proposed a soltution to issue 41 but still open
- 16:38:41 [Quentin]
- s/41/31
- 16:38:55 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/31 issue 31
- 16:39:19 [Quentin]
- Alistair says that the resolution still stands and wonders whether it could be resolved today
- 16:39:26 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0191.html issue 31 proposed resolution
- 16:39:30 [Antoine]
- +1
- 16:39:50 [Quentin]
- Tom, Alistair proposed that skos:preLabel should only have one value per language
- 16:40:16 [Quentin]
- ... says that it seems to be an adequate resolution
- 16:40:19 [seanb]
- +1
- 16:40:26 [Quentin]
- Antoine also supports this
- 16:40:50 [edsu]
- +1
- 16:41:17 [Guus]
- q?
- 16:41:44 [Quentin]
- RESOLVED ISSUE-31 is as per email (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0191.html)
- 16:42:52 [Quentin]
- Margherita says that the resolution only covers one point of ISSUE-31
- 16:43:38 [Quentin]
- Alistair says statement S11 covers the number language and S10 covers clashes between mutliple similar value for skos:prefLabel
- 16:44:04 [Quentin]
- Ralph asks where the statement specifies specific aspect of solution
- 16:44:39 [Quentin]
- Alistair mention that a section covers potential logical problems
- 16:45:29 [Quentin]
- ... section 1.6.1 speaks about formal constraints
- 16:46:31 [Quentin]
- Sean highlights that the resolution is clear but could still be considered as ambiguous
- 16:47:16 [Quentin]
- Ralph is ok with resolution but a seperate issue should be about the clarity of the document
- 16:48:16 [Quentin]
- ... seconds the resolution using the email from Alistair
- 16:48:25 [Guus]
- q+ on ftf need?
- 16:48:58 [Quentin]
- ISSUES 47
- 16:49:16 [Quentin]
- Antoine proposes two solutions to resolve this issue
- 16:49:20 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/47 issue 47
- 16:49:37 [Quentin]
- ... first relies on name class to express context
- 16:49:52 [Ralph]
- (Sean noted that issue 67 covers the 'clarity' question, and I agree)
- 16:50:02 [Quentin]
- ... second consist in adding a new resource for the mapping relation
- 16:50:48 [Quentin]
- ... explained both solution but hasn't investigated advantages and disadvantages of either
- 16:50:51 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0017.html Antoine's comments on issue 47
- 16:51:09 [Quentin]
- Guus still thinking about both solution and considers asking people outwith the group
- 16:51:58 [Zakim]
- edsu, you wanted to ask about subject indexing
- 16:52:49 [Quentin]
- Ed says a grop is using subject indexing but skos:subject are used
- 16:52:58 [TomB]
- q?
- 16:53:19 [Quentin]
- Alistair says these have not been formarly deprecated yet
- 16:53:29 [edsu]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0180.html
- 16:54:01 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/54 issue 54
- 16:54:19 [Quentin]
- Alistair and Antoine thinks ISSUE 54 was resolved following the Amsterdam F-2-F
- 16:54:54 [Quentin]
- Antoine mentions that ISSUE 80 covers some aspects of ISSUE 54
- 16:54:56 [Ralph]
- Antoine: -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/80 issue 80 carries forward the remaining parts of 54
- 16:55:16 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Antoine to propose a resoltuion for ISSUE 54 by next telecon
- 16:55:32 [Quentin]
- s/resoltuion/resolution
- 16:55:54 [Quentin]
- Alistair and Antoine to suggest priorities on different SKOS ISSUES to be resolved
- 16:56:29 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Alistair and Antoine to propose priorities on how to resolve ISSUE 56 to ISSUE 84
- 16:57:29 [Quentin]
- Topic: Recipes
- 16:57:35 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
- 16:57:38 [Quentin]
- --continues
- 16:57:45 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20]
- 16:57:48 [Quentin]
- --continues
- 16:58:00 [Quentin]
- Topic: VOCABULARY MANAGEMENT
- 16:58:27 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Vit and Elisa to include in the document all the target sections plus an allocation of sections to people and potentially a standard structure for sections [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action07]
- 16:58:36 [Quentin]
- --continues
- 16:58:59 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0020.html "New Editor's Draft Available" [Elis 2008-02-05]
- 16:59:09 [Quentin]
- Vit mentions that the list should make comment on the reviewed draft
- 16:59:23 [Quentin]
- Tom, this will be discussed next week
- 16:59:41 [Quentin]
- Topic: RDFa
- 16:59:46 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/Vocab/principles-20080204 04-Feb Vocab Management Editor's Draft
- 17:00:10 [Quentin]
- Guus says that we need to indicate that the next working draft is the last one and should be highlighted as suhc
- 17:00:25 [Quentin]
- ... no comment should be made on it afterwards
- 17:00:37 [Quentin]
- s/suhc/such
- 17:00:46 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-xhtml-minutes#item03 XHTML2 WG resolution
- 17:01:24 [Quentin]
- ... last call document need to state deadline for comments
- 17:01:57 [Quentin]
- ... 4 to 6 weeks is the minimum time frame for comments
- 17:02:27 [Quentin]
- ACTION: Ralph to ask task force to recommend appropriate time frma
- 17:02:53 [Quentin]
- Topic: SKOS
- 17:03:09 [Quentin]
- Guus says that most work might be resolved by May
- 17:03:26 [Ralph]
- [If an RDFa Last Call were published end of Feb, then 6 weeks puts us just before WWW2008]
- 17:03:28 [Quentin]
- ... proposes to hold a another f-2-f to solved final issues
- 17:03:47 [Ralph]
- s/sfrma/frame for RDFa Last Call review period/
- 17:04:27 [Quentin]
- ... one and half day meeting
- 17:04:40 [Quentin]
- ... 4-7th May 2008
- 17:05:09 [Zakim]
- -Vit
- 17:05:16 [Zakim]
- -msporny
- 17:05:17 [Zakim]
- -edsu
- 17:05:19 [Zakim]
- -Quentin
- 17:05:19 [Zakim]
- -berrueta
- 17:05:21 [Zakim]
- -Antoine
- 17:05:21 [Zakim]
- -Alistair.a
- 17:05:22 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 17:05:26 [Zakim]
- -seanb
- 17:05:26 [edsu]
- edsu has left #swd
- 17:05:32 [Zakim]
- -Margherita
- 17:05:34 [TomB]
- Quentin, you will finalize the notes?
- 17:05:37 [Zakim]
- -Guus
- 17:05:40 [Zakim]
- -Simone
- 17:05:43 [TomB]
- zakim, who is on the call?
- 17:05:43 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see TomB
- 17:05:50 [Zakim]
- -TomB
- 17:05:55 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
- 17:05:57 [Zakim]
- Attendees were TomB, Ralph, msporny, +0122427aaaa, Quentin, Guus_Schreiber, edsu, +31.20.420.aabb, Antoine, Simone, Vit, Margherita, berrueta, seanb, Guus
- 17:06:07 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, please draft minutes
- 17:06:07 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html Ralph
- 17:07:09 [Ralph]
- Chair: Tom
- 17:07:10 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, please draft minutes
- 17:07:10 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html Ralph
- 17:07:13 [Ralph]
- zakim, bye
- 17:07:13 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #swd
- 17:07:26 [Antoine]
- Antoine has left #swd
- 17:07:32 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, bye
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- I see 16 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-actions.rdf :
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Chairs to put schedule review on agenda [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action24] [1]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-06-17
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [2]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-09-11
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to prepare the email to request the decision for publishing on Feb 12th [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action24] [3]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-09-24
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph to let the task force that SWD require extended response on editor's draft [4]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-11-27
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph to publish Feb 12th version of SKOS primer as working draft [5]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-24-20
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Sean to propose a way to handle deprecated properties (Updating RDF schema) [6]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-35-04
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Alistair to make a proposal for Issue 40 (Concept Coordination) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action09] [7]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-35-21
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Alistair to propose an approach to clarify which aspects of the extension module should be in scope for the candidate recommendation package. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] [8]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-35-32
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Alistair and Guus to check the text in the primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action13] [9]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-35-46
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action10] [10]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-36-41
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Antoine to propose a resoltuion for ISSUE 54 by next telecon [11]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-55-16
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Alistair and Antoine to propose priorities on how to resolve ISSUE 56 to ISSUE 84 [12]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-56-29
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [13]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-57-35
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] [14]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-57-45
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Vit and Elisa to include in the document all the target sections plus an allocation of sections to people and potentially a standard structure for sections [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action07] [15]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T16-58-27
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph to ask task force to recommend appropriate time frma [16]
- 17:07:32 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-irc#T17-02-27
- 17:07:51 [Quentin]
- I'm planning to do the note before leaving tonight