15:01:58 RRSAgent has joined #owl 15:01:58 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/02/11-owl-irc 15:02:10 Zakim has joined #owl 15:02:19 zakim, who is here? 15:02:19 sorry, alanr, I don't know what conference this is 15:02:20 On IRC I see RRSAgent, IanH, alanr, vipul, sandro, Carsten, ewallace, trackbot-ng 15:02:34 zakim, this is owl 15:02:34 ok, alanr; that matches SW_OWL()10:00AM 15:02:40 zakim, who is here? 15:02:40 On the phone I see Alan, +0186527aaaa 15:02:41 On IRC I see RRSAgent, IanH, alanr, vipul, sandro, Carsten, ewallace, trackbot-ng 15:02:52 zakim, aaaa is IanH 15:02:52 +IanH; got it 15:03:24 zakim, who is here? 15:03:24 On the phone I see Alan, IanH 15:03:26 On IRC I see RRSAgent, IanH, alanr, vipul, sandro, Carsten, ewallace, trackbot-ng 15:05:56 +dlm 15:06:11 +Evan_Wallace 15:08:44 +Vipul_Kashyap 15:08:56 hi vipul 15:09:01 hi 15:12:34 edit this document: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Structural_Reference_Experiment 15:13:05 Anything is open - could rearrange order if necessary, add sections, etc. 15:17:56 +Peter_Patel-Schneider 15:18:40 pfps has joined #owl 15:19:11 dlm has joined #owl 15:19:19 old reference doesn't have a running example 15:19:49 also not sure it is desirable. Perhaps 2 or 3 different examples reused. 15:20:12 Problem is, using one example with every feature makes for a complicated example. 15:20:54 I'd like to see examples with inferences and possibly anti-examples showing common mistakes 15:21:43 for example rdfs:range in current reference doesn't show how use of a property causes a type to be inferred. 15:21:56 q+ 15:22:12 zakim, who is here? 15:22:12 On the phone I see Alan, IanH, dlm, Evan_Wallace, Vipul_Kashyap, Peter_Patel-Schneider 15:22:14 On IRC I see dlm, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, IanH, alanr, vipul, sandro, Carsten, ewallace, trackbot-ng 15:23:02 q? 15:23:10 zakim, unmute me 15:23:10 sorry, pfps, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 15:23:18 ack alanr 15:23:32 zakim, who is here 15:23:32 IanH, you need to end that query with '?' 15:23:34 +q 15:24:10 q? 15:24:58 ack dlm 15:25:12 We don't have a scribe. Do we need one? 15:26:07 q? 15:26:25 I agree with Alan that it is not necessary to have a single example running through the whole spec. 15:27:13 q+ 15:27:51 q+ 15:28:05 :-) 15:28:31 -Vipul_Kashyap 15:28:36 q? 15:29:16 ack alanr 15:29:21 q? 15:29:47 q+ 15:29:51 +q 15:29:56 ack ewallace 15:30:34 (define-ontology inconsistent-finite-infinite () 15:30:36 (class !human :partial) 15:30:37 (class !woman :partial) 15:30:38 ack me 15:30:39 (class !man :partial) 15:30:40 (sub-class-of !man !human) 15:30:42 (sub-class-of !woman !human) 15:30:43 (disjoint-classes !woman !man) 15:30:45 (object-property !child) 15:30:46 (object-property !father (inverse-of !child)) 15:30:48 (sub-class-of !human (restriction !father (all-values-from !man))) 15:30:49 (sub-class-of !human (restriction !father (cardinality 1))) 15:30:51 (sub-class-of !human (restriction !child (max-cardinality 1))) 15:30:52 (object-property !ssn :inverse-functional (range (one-of !one !two))) 15:30:54 (sub-class-of !human (restriction !ssn (cardinality 1))) 15:30:55 (individual !mary (type !woman)) 15:30:57 (individual !one) 15:30:58 (individual !two) 15:31:00 ) 15:31:24 q? 15:31:27 q? 15:31:32 zakim, mute me 15:31:32 pfps should now be muted 15:33:36 zakim, unmute me 15:33:36 pfps should no longer be muted 15:34:19 I'm interested 15:35:21 q+ 15:36:03 q? 15:36:18 q- 15:37:33 q- 15:38:00 zakim, mute me 15:38:00 pfps should now be muted 15:38:23 q? 15:38:58 q+ 15:39:38 primer, overview, & reference? 15:40:18 q? 15:40:28 Elisa talked about a quick start. 15:40:38 would like to understand what would be in the overview 15:40:41 q? 15:40:43 q+ 15:40:50 ack me 15:42:52 q? 15:43:28 q? 15:45:02 disjointWith: Classes may be stated to be disjoint from each other. For example, Man and Woman can be stated to be disjoint classes. From this disjointWith statement, a reasoner can deduce an inconsistency when an individual is stated to be an instance of both and similarly a reasoner can deduce that if A is an instance of Man, then A is not an instance of Woman. 15:45:24 q? 15:45:30 ack alanr 15:45:47 q? 15:47:10 q? 15:47:18 q? 15:48:10 q? 15:48:23 +Vipul_Kashyap 15:48:29 q? 15:49:14 zakim, unmute me 15:49:14 pfps should no longer be muted 15:49:15 this was discussed at f2f. 15:49:34 +1 15:49:37 +q 15:49:45 q? 15:49:48 for one thing, it's hard for a user to know where to go for definitive answers 15:50:27 q? 15:51:02 q+ 15:51:19 q? 15:51:21 suggestion wasn't to drop overview. Rather to define it so as to not have overlap. Overview should have distinct and clear point of view 15:51:27 ack dlm 15:51:30 ack pfps 15:51:49 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ 15:52:37 q? 15:53:45 q? 15:56:17 q? 15:57:08 q? 15:57:25 q+ 15:57:29 q? 15:58:29 q? 15:58:37 ack alanr 15:58:40 -Vipul_Kashyap 16:00:59 q? 16:03:07 q? 16:04:30 -Alan 16:04:32 -Evan_Wallace 16:04:53 -pfps 16:04:54 Do we want to convert the IRC into minutes? 16:05:03 -dlm 16:05:06 And if so what are the magic words? 16:05:51 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:05:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/02/11-owl-minutes.html alanr 16:06:06 rrsagent, make minutes public 16:06:06 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', alanr. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:06:07 Thanks! 16:06:25 rrsagent, make log world-readable 16:07:12 -IanH 16:07:13 SW_OWL()10:00AM has ended 16:07:15 Attendees were Alan, +0186527aaaa, IanH, dlm, Evan_Wallace, Vipul_Kashyap, pfps 16:51:46 sandro has joined #owl 19:12:28 alanr has joined #owl 19:26:58 Zakim has left #owl 19:37:46 sandro has joined #owl 20:05:55 sandro has joined #owl 20:09:25 sandro has joined #owl 21:02:55 sandro has joined #owl 21:19:45 alanr has joined #owl 22:12:20 alanr has joined #owl 22:25:44 alanr has joined #owl 23:07:55 sandro has joined #owl