IRC log of core on 2008-02-06
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 19:48:07 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #core
- 19:48:07 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-core-irc
- 19:48:13 [aphillip]
- zakim, this will be I18N
- 19:48:13 [Zakim]
- ok, aphillip; I see I18N_CoreWG()3:00PM scheduled to start in 12 minutes
- 19:48:40 [aphillip]
- RRSAgent, set logs world-visible
- 19:49:16 [aphillip]
- Teleconference: Internationalization Core WG
- 19:49:46 [aphillip]
- Meeting: Internationalization Core WG
- 19:49:53 [aphillip]
- Chair: Addison Phillips
- 19:50:00 [aphillip]
- Scribe: Addison Phillips
- 19:50:04 [aphillip]
- ScribeNick: aphillip
- 19:50:24 [aphillip]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Core_Homework#Agenda_topics
- 19:50:48 [aphillip]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 19:50:48 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-core-minutes.html aphillip
- 20:01:22 [Mick]
- Mick has joined #core
- 20:01:55 [Zakim]
- I18N_CoreWG()3:00PM has now started
- 20:02:03 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Monaghan
- 20:02:16 [Zakim]
- +aphillip
- 20:02:40 [r12a]
- r12a has joined #core
- 20:02:44 [r12a]
- zakim, dial richard please
- 20:02:44 [Zakim]
- ok, r12a; the call is being made
- 20:02:46 [Zakim]
- +Richard
- 20:04:08 [aphillip]
- Topic: Agenda
- 20:04:30 [aphillip]
- http://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Core_Homework#Agenda_topics
- 20:05:57 [aphillip]
- Topic: Info Share
- 20:06:58 [aphillip]
- richard: kevin novak was formerly a wg member from Library of Congress; a new representative will be joining us shortly
- 20:08:11 [aphillip]
- Topic: Action Items
- 20:08:27 [aphillip]
- Addison to finish revising Unicode Migration for publication; Addison to resolve editing issues
- 20:08:56 [aphillip]
- Addison: check C14N XML 1.1 for health warning on normalization and comment appropriately if there is not one
- 20:09:05 [aphillip]
- Addison: contact C14N XML about IRI issue and seek resolution
- 20:09:19 [aphillip]
- DONE in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2008JanMar/0019.html
- 20:10:13 [aphillip]
- Felix to contact XML Schema to ask them not to close language validation issue before we've seen the wording
- 20:10:27 [aphillip]
- Richard create notes on how to use the wiki template
- 20:10:44 [aphillip]
- Richard to publish Character encoding for Beginners article [DONE]
- 20:11:35 [aphillip]
- Topic: Case Folding in CSS 2.1
- 20:12:49 [aphillip]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2007OctDec/0050.html
- 20:13:25 [andrewc]
- andrewc has joined #core
- 20:16:33 [Zakim]
- +andrewc
- 20:16:44 [aphillip]
- addison: suggested references to Unicode and a health warning on using default locale
- 20:17:09 [aphillip]
- richard: thought we would suggest not doing case folding generally
- 20:17:23 [r12a]
- regrets: david
- 20:17:27 [aphillip]
- addison: also: my suggestions are kind of too heavy-weight
- 20:18:33 [aphillip]
- addison: suggestion that we document something somewhere else that others can reference
- 20:18:54 [aphillip]
- richard: suggest that we start small
- 20:19:02 [aphillip]
- richard: don't start with Note status
- 20:19:16 [aphillip]
- richard: just put basic ideas down first
- 20:19:28 [aphillip]
- richard: put to wiki or blog first
- 20:20:41 [aphillip]
- ACTION: Addison: write basic outline in wiki for a note on case folding
- 20:21:02 [aphillip]
- Topic: HTML5 and CharMod conformance
- 20:23:52 [aphillip]
- addison: status of architecture WG and it's work items... and our relation to them
- 20:25:34 [aphillip]
- (discussion of background of charmod and also the conformance thereto)
- 20:27:12 [aphillip]
- andrew: they call out their position well
- 20:27:27 [aphillip]
- addison: need to decide if we (or they) got it wrong
- 20:29:44 [aphillip]
- (discussion of how UA's interpret iso8859-1 vs. windows-1252)
- 20:30:41 [aphillip]
- andrew: also people using custom fonts with iso8859-1 as the declared encoding
- 20:31:38 [aphillip]
- andrew: also interplay between encoding, runtime, etc.
- 20:32:00 [aphillip]
- andrew: two issues: what browsers do is one thing and what authors should do is another
- 20:32:35 [aphillip]
- andrew: should separate what authors do and what browsers should do
- 20:34:14 [aphillip]
- addison: this is the ultimate fallback after all other considerations have been applied
- 20:35:40 [mm]
- mm has joined #core
- 20:35:46 [aphillip]
- addison: charmod has a requirement that if something says encoding 'x', then you must use encoding 'x'
- 20:36:11 [aphillip]
- ... but html5 says if 8859-1, then bytes 0x80->0x9F should be interpreted as 1252
- 20:37:28 [aphillip]
- mick: so are we saying we should change charmod?
- 20:37:43 [aphillip]
- addison: maybe... but maybe just endorse their "willful violation"
- 20:38:48 [aphillip]
- addison: have a table in my day job where I do this for a variety of encodings :-)
- 20:38:58 [aphillip]
- richard: support writing up questions if we don't have answers
- 20:39:29 [aphillip]
- addison: strong feelings of opposition to what they've done?
- 20:39:36 [aphillip]
- richard: don't know enough yet; maybe martin?
- 20:39:55 [aphillip]
- richard: or possibly francois...
- 20:40:36 [aphillip]
- andrew: not to concerned about what they tell browser writers to do, but they need to be clear about what authors should do
- 20:41:28 [aphillip]
- andrew: they should provide strong guidance to authors; for example, if it is 1252, then it should be labeled windows-1252
- 20:41:48 [aphillip]
- mick: agree; should be fixed at the author, rather than browser, level---browsers didn't create this problem
- 20:41:58 [aphillip]
- addison: +1
- 20:43:19 [aphillip]
- ACTION: andrew: write up a position statement describing why the willful violation exists and advising authors on the Right Thing to do with encoding declaration
- 20:44:06 [aphillip]
- Topic: styling in HTML5 and dir on public list thread: needs follow up
- 20:44:15 [aphillip]
- defer for felix's attendance
- 20:44:44 [aphillip]
- Topic: Named entities for bidi controls vs. markup
- 20:44:53 [aphillip]
- ... was responding to our TPAC notes, where there was a suggestion of having the Unicode bidi controls as entities (instead of markup)
- 20:45:05 [aphillip]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2007OctDec/0144.html
- 20:46:24 [aphillip]
- richard: the problme is that named entities don't translate well into XML
- 20:46:33 [aphillip]
- s/problme/problem/
- 20:46:56 [aphillip]
- richard: probably should get XML 1.0 6E to incorporate some of this
- 20:47:08 [aphillip]
- addison: actually as named entities?
- 20:47:19 [aphillip]
- richard: doubt they'd consider it; there are alreasy a few in there
- 20:47:33 [aphillip]
- richard: HTML maybe should have some of these
- 20:48:12 [aphillip]
- addison: now we have two ways of marking bidi (controls vs. markup) and this would add a third
- 20:49:30 [aphillip]
- andrew: it gives you something to see in your ascii editor
- 20:50:03 [aphillip]
- andrew: no good if you're in an RTL editing environment
- 20:50:54 [aphillip]
- richard: anywhere you can't use markup you can't use entities either
- 20:51:12 [aphillip]
- richard: except for attributes or elements such as title
- 20:51:35 [aphillip]
- ... and entities might be valuable there
- 20:52:49 [aphillip]
- addison: title and attribute argument is somewhat compelling
- 20:53:55 [aphillip]
- ... already can put controls as NCRs... but that's not user friendly... have mysterious code point references
- 20:54:23 [aphillip]
- richard: but if you know these things, you probably just want the code points........
- 20:54:35 [aphillip]
- richard: need to publich proposal or question for feedback
- 20:55:04 [aphillip]
- mick: write to winter list?
- 20:55:11 [aphillip]
- addison: also unicode bidi list
- 20:58:29 [aphillip]
- ACTION: Michael: write a proposal/summary message for eventual distribution to winter, et al, relating to doing bidi entities vs. markup vs. controls
- 20:59:15 [aphillip]
- send to member list; target next week if possible or the week after if no
- 20:59:22 [aphillip]
- s/if no/if not
- 20:59:59 [aphillip]
- Topic: AOB?
- 21:00:31 [Zakim]
- -Michael_Monaghan
- 21:00:37 [aphillip]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 21:00:37 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-core-minutes.html aphillip
- 21:00:54 [Zakim]
- -aphillip
- 21:04:46 [Zakim]
- -andrewc
- 21:04:55 [andrewc]
- andrewc has left #core
- 21:05:00 [aphillip]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 21:05:00 [RRSAgent]
- I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-core-actions.rdf :
- 21:05:00 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Addison: write basic outline in wiki for a note on case folding [1]
- 21:05:00 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-core-irc#T20-20-41
- 21:05:00 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: andrew: write up a position statement describing why the willful violation exists and advising authors on the Right Thing to do with encoding declaration [2]
- 21:05:00 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-core-irc#T20-43-19
- 21:05:00 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael: write a proposal/summary message for eventual distribution to winter, et al, relating to doing bidi entities vs. markup vs. controls [3]
- 21:05:00 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-core-irc#T20-58-29