IRC log of xproc on 2008-01-24
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:03:06 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #xproc
- 16:03:06 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-xproc-irc
- 16:03:11 [Norm]
- Zakim, who's on the call?
- 16:03:11 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see +1.415.404.aaaa, Alessandro_Vernet, Norm
- 16:03:29 [Norm]
- Zakim, aaaa is alexmilowski
- 16:03:29 [Zakim]
- +alexmilowski; got it
- 16:03:51 [Zakim]
- +??P46
- 16:03:53 [Norm]
- Meeting: XML Processing Model WG
- 16:03:53 [Norm]
- Date: 24 January 2008
- 16:03:53 [Norm]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/01/24-agenda
- 16:03:53 [Norm]
- Meeting: 99
- 16:03:53 [Norm]
- Chair: Norm
- 16:03:54 [Norm]
- Scribe: Norm
- 16:03:55 [ruilopes]
- Zakim, ? is me
- 16:03:55 [Zakim]
- +ruilopes; got it
- 16:03:56 [Norm]
- ScribeNick: Norm
- 16:04:12 [richard]
- richard has joined #xproc
- 16:04:54 [Zakim]
- +??P50
- 16:04:58 [richard]
- zakim, ? is me
- 16:05:00 [Zakim]
- +richard; got it
- 16:05:12 [Norm]
- Zakim, who's on the phne?
- 16:05:12 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, Norm.
- 16:05:23 [Norm]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 16:05:23 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see alexmilowski, Alessandro_Vernet, Norm, ruilopes, richard
- 16:05:32 [Norm]
- Regrets: Paul
- 16:05:59 [MoZ]
- MoZ has joined #xproc
- 16:06:36 [AndrewF]
- AndrewF has joined #xproc
- 16:06:36 [Norm]
- Present: Alex, Alessandro, Norm, Rui, Richard
- 16:06:40 [MoZ]
- Zakim, what is the code ?
- 16:06:40 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 97762 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), MoZ
- 16:06:52 [Norm]
- Present: Alex, Alessandro, Norm, Rui, Richard, Andrew
- 16:06:54 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept this agenda?
- 16:06:54 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/01/24-agenda
- 16:07:01 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:07:07 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
- 16:07:07 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/01/17-minutes
- 16:07:13 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:07:18 [Norm]
- Topic: Next meeting: telcon 31 January 2008?
- 16:07:24 [Zakim]
- + +95247aabb
- 16:07:25 [Zakim]
- +??P9
- 16:07:35 [AndrewF]
- zakim, ? is Andrew
- 16:07:35 [Zakim]
- +Andrew; got it
- 16:07:40 [MoZ]
- Zakim, aabb is me
- 16:07:40 [Zakim]
- +MoZ; got it
- 16:07:49 [Norm]
- Present: Alex, Alessandro, Norm, Rui, Richard, Andrew, Mohamed
- 16:07:56 [Norm]
- No regrets given
- 16:08:15 [Norm]
- Topic: 70. Circular imports
- 16:08:48 [alexmilowski]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2008Jan/0040.html
- 16:09:29 [Norm]
- Alex: Essentially, we want to get it right without describing a particular algorithm
- 16:09:40 [Norm]
- ...I took the text from the XML spec and tweaked it a bit
- 16:10:41 [Norm]
- Alex: The algorithm in the proposed Appendix G is based on Henry's proposal.
- 16:12:24 [Norm]
- Norm: I'm happy with the changes to section 5, I'll need to study the appendix more
- 16:12:31 [Norm]
- Alex: The appendix is non-normative, right?
- 16:12:35 [Norm]
- Norm: Yes.
- 16:12:48 [ht]
- HST agrees
- 16:13:28 [Norm]
- Richard: About the retreival URIs, if you did it naively, you might think that you had to go and fetch the document every time to see if its retreival URI winds up being the same as one you've already got.
- 16:13:46 [Norm]
- ...But in practice, if its literal URI is the same, you can assume its actual URI is the same too.
- 16:14:00 [Norm]
- Alex: Do we have language elsewhere about consistency of resource?
- 16:14:11 [Norm]
- Richard: Even if it did change, there's no gaurantee that you'll see it.
- 16:15:35 [Norm]
- Norm: So we should say that in section 5
- 16:15:45 [Norm]
- Richard: Either that, or some generral statement along the lines that Alex suggested
- 16:16:32 [ht]
- zakim, please call ht-781
- 16:16:32 [Zakim]
- ok, ht; the call is being made
- 16:16:33 [Zakim]
- +Ht
- 16:16:40 [Norm]
- Norm: I think a general statement is probably the way to go
- 16:17:00 [Norm]
- Present: Alex, Alessandro, Norm, Rui, Richard, Andrew, Mohamed, Henry
- 16:18:05 [MoZ]
- I think we cannot avoid caching neither
- 16:18:31 [Norm]
- Alex: Maybe we could do a special case for import. Shouldn't we say that however you get a URI, the declarations will be consistent.
- 16:20:18 [Norm]
- ACTION: Alex to tweak the setting of p:import
- 16:20:31 [Norm]
- s/setting/text of/
- 16:21:10 [Norm]
- Topic: 95. XSLT pattern matching in Pviewport
- 16:21:15 [Norm]
- s/Pvie/p:vie/
- 16:22:18 [Norm]
- Norm: I thought we were clear on 95, but yes we should be
- 16:22:39 [Norm]
- ACTION: Norm to check the clarity of the sepc
- 16:22:44 [Norm]
- s/sepc/spec/
- 16:23:16 [Norm]
- Topic: 96. Compound steps with empty subpipelines
- 16:23:25 [Norm]
- Norm: Static error 27.
- 16:24:47 [Norm]
- Topic: 97. p:set-attributes and attributes with xmlns prefix
- 16:25:33 [Norm]
- Richard: Namespaces don't appear in the attributes property in the infoset
- 16:26:00 [Norm]
- Alex: I think we should allow users to set xmlns: attributes.
- 16:26:11 [Norm]
- ...Namespace fixup will correct user errors.
- 16:26:36 [Norm]
- Richard: I don't think so.
- 16:26:49 [Norm]
- ...Namespaces aren't attributes as far as the infoset is concerned.
- 16:28:13 [Norm]
- Alex: I think p:add-attribute could add namespaces.
- 16:28:18 [Norm]
- Richard: Bad. Bad. Bad.
- 16:28:48 [Norm]
- Henry: Here's the question: can you use xsl:attribute to add a namespace decl?
- 16:28:50 [Norm]
- Norm: No.
- 16:28:59 [Norm]
- Henry: Right, the add-attribute shouldn't either.
- 16:29:06 [Norm]
- s/the add/then add/
- 16:29:15 [Norm]
- Alex: But you could still do it with a transform
- 16:29:20 [Norm]
- Henry: I think my analysis holds
- 16:29:23 [Norm]
- Norm: +1
- 16:30:08 [Norm]
- Richard: The rule should be that you can't manipulate namespaces by manipulating namespace attributes
- 16:30:41 [Norm]
- Henry: The only circumstance you need it for is when you want to create a prefix for a QName that you're going to use in a value
- 16:30:51 [Norm]
- Alex: I think add-attribute needs a modification and set-attributes needs a clarification.
- 16:31:13 [Norm]
- ACTION: Alex to consider the attribute steps and make appropriate changes
- 16:32:18 [Norm]
- Richard: In a sense this is already implicit in the infoset conformance section.
- 16:33:35 [Norm]
- Mohamed: I'm not sure I understand the path. The original question was do the namespace attributes get copied. The answer is 'no'
- 16:33:59 [Norm]
- Alex: Right. We're going to clarify that set-attributes doesn't copy them and clean up the other steps too.
- 16:34:22 [Norm]
- Topic: 98. Typo in p:label-elements
- 16:34:28 [Norm]
- Norm: Yep
- 16:34:59 [Norm]
- Topic: 99. Execution order of steps
- 16:38:16 [Norm]
- Alex: Event/consequence ordering is determined by the connections.
- 16:39:09 [Norm]
- Norm: What I recall is that if you mandated document order, then you'd have to make forward reference an error. But the impl can fix the order, so why make theuser move teh steps around?
- 16:39:39 [Norm]
- Norm: It seems an unnecessary burden on the user.
- 16:40:41 [Norm]
- Henry: I still don't know what he means by "do things"
- 16:41:14 [Norm]
- Some discussion of what ordering actually means
- 16:41:33 [MoZ]
- it is NOT a total order at all !
- 16:42:25 [MoZ]
- 1- parallele exection need this feature
- 16:42:34 [MoZ]
- 2 - automatic generation would also need this
- 16:43:25 [Norm]
- Richard: I think there are straightforward cases where it's natural to write in the pipeline using forward references.
- 16:44:12 [Norm]
- ...Consider a straightforward pipeline with an XSLT step in the middle where the stylesheet is generated. It's natural to put the stylesheet generation at the end of the pipeline.
- 16:44:49 [Norm]
- Richard: Is it always possible to write pipelines without forward references?
- 16:44:53 [Norm]
- Norm: I think so.
- 16:46:04 [Norm]
- Alex: We're all in agreement, right?
- 16:46:40 [Norm]
- Alex: Maybe a note?
- 16:47:44 [Norm]
- ACTION: Henry to reply and close the issue
- 16:48:12 [Norm]
- Topic: Any other business?
- 16:48:19 [Norm]
- Alex: We have comments that continue to straggle in.
- 16:48:25 [Norm]
- ...What is our plan?
- 16:50:24 [Norm]
- Norm: We're going to do another last call, as soon as that's ready we'll push it out
- 16:50:38 [Norm]
- ...Until then, I don't see any harm in looking at the comments that come in.
- 16:50:46 [Norm]
- Adjourned.
- 16:51:42 [Zakim]
- -Norm
- 16:51:44 [Zakim]
- -richard
- 16:51:45 [Zakim]
- -MoZ
- 16:51:46 [Zakim]
- -Ht
- 16:51:48 [Zakim]
- -alexmilowski
- 16:51:49 [Norm]
- rrsange, set logs world-visible
- 16:51:49 [Zakim]
- -Alessandro_Vernet
- 16:51:51 [Zakim]
- -ruilopes
- 16:51:52 [Zakim]
- -Andrew
- 16:51:53 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()11:00AM has ended
- 16:51:54 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.415.404.aaaa, Alessandro_Vernet, Norm, alexmilowski, ruilopes, richard, +95247aabb, Andrew, MoZ, Ht
- 16:51:56 [Norm]
- RRSAgent, set logs world-visible
- 16:52:03 [Norm]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 16:52:03 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-xproc-minutes.html Norm
- 18:18:41 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #xproc
- 18:31:58 [MSM]
- MSM has joined #xproc