W3C

TSD TF

22 Jan 2008

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
CarlosV, Shadi, Christophe, CarlosI, Tim
Regrets
Michael, Andrew
Chair
Christophe, CarlosV
Scribe
CarlosI, Tim

Contents


Reviewing test samples

CS: no new reviews

Naming convention and test suite ID in metadata

rule/@primary and testCase/@complexity

CS: discussion about primary and complexity attributes

<CarlosI> CS: forgot to send the summarize for ids issue

<CarlosI> CS: will do for next time

CS: sent examples to list before meeting

<Christophe> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Jan/0006.html

CS: how many rules in a single test sample?
... what are criteria for putting rules in test samples?
... only allow primary rules, or multiple test samples addressing same issue?

CI: in favor of focusing each test sample in terms of one single rule

CS: what about rules that relate to same issue (example: color contrast)?

CI: different rules..

CS: one primary rule and no other rules per test sample?

Resolution: test sample should have one primary rule and no other rules

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/process.html

<scribe> ACTION: CI to send new wording on clear scope re: checklist for content review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01]

CI: clarify current view re: test samples focus on one SC but may be affected by others?

CS: where should this be covered?

<Christophe> Brainstorming corner: http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/BrainstormingCorner

<scribe> ACTION: CI to take note of disclaimer for single rule test samples [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-tsdtf-minutes.html#action02]

CS: anything needed about complexity attribute?

CI: need to "clean up" uploaded test samples?

<scribe> ACTION: CV to clean up complexity and primary attributes from the current test samples [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-tsdtf-minutes.html#action03]

Review of action items

<Christophe> <locations expectedResult="pass">

CI: why we don't have any metadata for expected result?

already previous discussions on topic..

CS: should we use EARL in writing up expected result?

CI: no metadata description, and why do we need one expected result at each location?
... should be tied to rule element?

CS: should discuss more on mailing list..

<scribe> ACTION: CS to improve using TCDL documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04]

CS: next meeting 5 February

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: CI to send new wording on clear scope re: checklist for content review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: CI to take note of disclaimer for single rule test samples [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-tsdtf-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: CS to improve using TCDL documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: CV to clean up complexity and primary attributes from the current test samples [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-tsdtf-minutes.html#action03]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.133 (CVS log)
$Date: 2008/01/22 20:12:15 $