15:55:20 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #swd
15:55:20 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc
15:55:25 <Ralph> rrsagent, please make record public
15:56:22 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #swd
15:56:38 <TomB> zakim, this will be swd
15:56:38 <Zakim> ok, TomB, I see SW_SWD()11:00AM already started
15:56:43 <TomB> Meeting: SWD WG
15:56:46 <TomB> Chair: Tom
15:57:06 <TomB> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0143.html
15:57:26 <TomB> Previous: http://www.w3.org/2008/01/15-swd-minutes.html
15:57:29 <Quentin> Quentin has joined #swd
15:57:50 <TomB> Regrets: Sean, Michael, Margherita, Simone
15:58:06 <TomB> zakim, who is on the call?
15:58:06 <Zakim> On the phone I see ??P6
15:58:13 <TomB> zakim, ??P6 is TomB
15:58:13 <Zakim> +TomB; got it
15:58:29 <aliman> aliman has joined #swd
15:58:33 <TomB> zakim, please list attendees
15:58:33 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been TomB
15:58:35 <Zakim> + +2242aaaa
15:58:49 <TomB> zakim, 2242aaaa is Quentin
15:58:49 <Zakim> sorry, TomB, I do not recognize a party named '2242aaaa'
15:58:57 <TomB> zakim, aaaa is Quentin
15:58:58 <Zakim> +Quentin; got it
15:59:14 <vit> vit has joined #swd
15:59:23 <Zakim> +Ralph
16:00:36 <Antoine> Antoine has joined #swd
16:00:53 <JonP> JonP has joined #swd
16:02:09 <Zakim> +Antoine_Isaac
16:02:20 <Zakim> +??P31
16:02:29 <TomB> zakim, ??P31 is aliman
16:02:29 <Zakim> +aliman; got it
16:03:10 <dlrubin> dlrubin has joined #swd
16:03:27 <Zakim> +??P35
16:04:10 <Zakim> +??P38
16:04:12 <TomB> zakim, ??P35 is Ben
16:04:12 <Zakim> +Ben; got it
16:04:28 <Ralph> zakim, ??p38 is DLRubin
16:04:29 <Zakim> +DLRubin; got it
16:04:42 <Zakim> +??P40
16:04:48 <Ralph> zakim, ??p40 is Vit
16:04:56 <Zakim> +Vit; got it
16:05:00 <Zakim> +??P12
16:05:03 <TomB> zakim, ??PP12 is Guus
16:05:16 <Zakim> sorry, TomB, I do not recognize a party named '??PP12'
16:05:16 <TomB> zakim, ??P12 is Guus
16:05:24 <Zakim> +Guus; got it
16:05:56 <Guus> Guus has joined #swd
16:05:57 <berrueta> berrueta has joined #swd
16:06:10 <benadida> benadida has joined #SWD
16:06:33 <Ralph> zakim, nick benadida is Ben
16:06:33 <Zakim> ok, Ralph, I now associate benadida with Ben
16:06:46 <TomB> scribe: benadida
16:06:51 <TomB> scribenick: benadida
16:07:04 <Zakim> +abel
16:07:12 <berrueta> Zakim, abel is me
16:07:12 <benadida> Tom: propose that we accept minutes from 15 Jan telecon
16:07:14 <Zakim> +berrueta; got it
16:07:29 <benadida> RESOLVED, minutes accepted
16:07:46 <benadida> Topic: SKOS
16:07:47 <Zakim> +Jon_Phipps
16:07:54 <benadida> --> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#SKOS
16:08:24 <JonP> zakim, Jon_Phipps is me
16:08:24 <Zakim> +JonP; got it
16:08:30 <benadida> Tom: can we take a decision to publish on this call?
16:08:41 <benadida> Ralph: if reviewers are happy, don't mind.
16:08:44 <benadida> Guus: me neither
16:09:05 <benadida> Alistair: we addressed all comments in reviews, all sensible
16:09:33 <benadida> ... last week agreed to propose a resolution on ISSUE-44
16:09:33 <Ralph> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0148.html "PROPOSED: To publish the SKOS Reference Editors' Draft 18 January 2008" [Alistair 2008-01-22]
16:09:46 <benadida> ... new draft incorporates this proposal
16:09:51 <benadida> Guus: still need to agree to this.
16:09:57 <Clay> Clay has joined #swd
16:10:03 <benadida> Alistair: Quentin's comment no longer applies
16:10:06 <Zakim> +[LC]
16:10:16 <Clay> zakim, LC is Clay
16:10:16 <Zakim> +Clay; got it
16:10:17 <benadida> ... exactmatch property, transitive?
16:10:32 <benadida> ... added a number of new issue to tracker, fine-grained, corresponds to decision points
16:10:52 <Ralph> Alistair: added a bunch of editorial notes to -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20080118#L1309 Section 10
16:11:06 <benadida> ... Vit's review: comment on introduction, "what is skos?"
16:11:10 <ed> ed has joined #swd
16:11:40 <benadida> ... new appendices D, E and F for discussions
16:11:44 <Zakim> +[LC]
16:11:52 <ed> Zakim: LC is me
16:12:07 <benadida> ... a number of points re: section 7, now issues in the tracker
16:12:15 <benadida> ... comments on section titles, some have been renamed
16:12:30 <ed> Zakim, LC is me
16:12:30 <Zakim> +ed; got it
16:12:48 <benadida> Alistair: ISSUE-36, some text proposed to resolve that issue.
16:13:10 <benadida> ... most of that text pushed to appendix E
16:13:29 <benadida> ... using name of concept scheme as name of RDF graph, then used to query
16:13:51 <benadida> ... Tom raised point that label relations confusingly named, ed note + issue.
16:14:04 <benadida> ... Tom also raised comment about statement of formal definitions, worth discussing.
16:14:38 <benadida> [scribe lost track of some the discussion]
16:15:10 <benadida> Alistair: a number of hooks for input and links to issues in tracker.
16:15:43 <benadida> Tom: resolution to ISSUE-44 on critical path to WD?
16:15:55 <benadida> Alistair: could publish with issue open, or do we have to resolve it?
16:15:58 <benadida> Tom: on agenda
16:16:12 <benadida> ... are you proposing that it be published as WD?
16:16:14 <benadida> Alistair: yes.
16:16:28 <benadida> Tom: should we discuss ISSUE-44 beforehand?
16:16:47 <benadida> Ralph: prefer to make decision on WD independent of ISSUE-44
16:16:59 <benadida> Alistair: plenty in draft that relates to open issues
16:17:03 <benadida> ... could add an additional ed. note.
16:17:09 <benadida> Ralph: I'd like to see that.
16:17:16 <benadida> ACTION: Alistair to add editorial note linking ISSUE-44
16:17:34 <benadida> Tom: PROPOSAL publish SKOS as WD.
16:17:47 <benadida> Ralph: second.
16:17:57 <benadida> ... I see a 7.6.6 reference to ISSUE-44, might be enough.
16:18:13 <benadida> [DONE] ACTION: Alistair to add editorial note linking ISSUE-44
16:18:33 <benadida> Alistair: yes it's good enough.
16:18:46 <benadida> Tom: anyone against publishing as WD?
16:19:03 <benadida> [no objections]
16:19:49 <benadida> Ralph: abstentions?
16:19:51 <benadida> [none]
16:19:57 <benadida> RESOLVED: SKOS published as WD
16:20:13 <benadida> Ralph: there will be a W3C homepage blurb
16:20:42 <benadida> ACTION: Ralph get SKOS WD published
16:21:35 <benadida> Alistair: will publish a revision of editors' draft.
16:22:00 <Ralph> Ralph: please put real refs in for @@X's
16:22:03 <Ralph> Alistair: ok, will do
16:22:10 <benadida> [DONE] ACTION: Alistair send an email to the list by the end of next week that the reviewers can agree with and then propose publishing as WD by Jan 22
16:22:24 <benadida> ACTION: Guus to schedule to discussion on the notation (syntax) used in SKOS examples in Reference and Primer in two weeks time, i.e. on 29 January
16:22:26 <benadida> -- continues
16:22:47 <benadida> ACTION: Alistair and Guus write draft section in primer on relationship between SKOS concepts and OWL classes for OWL DL users
16:22:48 <benadida> -- continues
16:22:59 <benadida> ACTION: Margherita to review the SKOS primer
16:23:02 <benadida> -- done
16:23:26 <Ralph> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html Margherita's review of SKOS Primer
16:23:33 <benadida> Tom: when should we take a decision to publish SKOS primer?
16:24:09 <benadida> Antoine: hope to send mail in coming days on this topic
16:24:17 <benadida> Ed: been out of touch for 3 days, catching up ASAP.
16:24:57 <benadida> Ralph: not sure we can take a decision today
16:24:59 <benadida> Tom: agreed.
16:25:51 <benadida> ACTION: Antoine to track the resolutions to ISSUE 36
16:26:19 <benadida> --done
16:26:20 <benadida> Antoine: seems like we can aim to resolve this issue
16:27:04 <Ralph> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0136.html Re: [SKOS] About Closing ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment [Antoine 2008-01-19]
16:27:19 <benadida> Tom: some confusion about exact text for agreement. It would help to put the text into meeting record.
16:28:06 <benadida> [discussion about the text]
16:28:28 <Ralph> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0093.html Antoine's proposed resolution to ISSUE-36
16:29:05 <benadida> Ralph: resolve to close ISSUE-36?
16:29:40 <benadida> Tom: PROPOSE http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0093.html as resolution to ISSUE-36
16:29:59 <benadida> Alistair: +1, though the wording is slightly different from what Antoine put together
16:30:09 <benadida> Antoine: we can live with that.
16:30:12 <benadida> Alistair: yes.
16:30:31 <benadida> Tom: RESOLVED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0093.html as resolution to ISSUE-36
16:30:44 <benadida> RESOLVED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0093.html as resolution to ISSUE-36
16:31:13 <benadida> Tom: ISSUE-44: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0052.html
16:31:29 <benadida> Guus: broad consensus about resolution I sent.
16:31:32 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html Ralph
16:31:49 <benadida> ... would we make revised naming for broader and narrower a part of this resolution
16:32:01 <benadida> Antoine: not at all asking for that.
16:32:24 <benadida> ... I've raised the issue, but I support a resolution to ISSUE-44 without considering this naming convention stuff.
16:32:35 <benadida> Guus: then I propose to resolve the issue.
16:33:10 <Guus> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0090.html
16:33:19 <Guus> Issue 44
16:33:37 <Ralph> -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/44 Issue 44
16:34:07 <benadida> [question missed by Scribe]
16:34:17 <benadida> Guus: applications shouldn't treat broaderNarrower as transitive
16:34:31 <benadida> ... but broadertranstiive narrowertransitive should
16:34:47 <benadida> s/tiive/itive/
16:35:02 <benadida> ... if that becomes common practice, we may accommodate that in the standard.
16:35:50 <benadida> Tom: PROPOSE that we accept http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0090.html as resolution to ISSUE-44
16:36:11 <benadida> Ralph: Sean owns the issue, and supports the resolution.
16:36:27 <Ralph> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0097.html Sean's support for this resolution
16:36:35 <benadida> Tom: any objections?
16:36:38 <benadida> [none]
16:36:48 <benadida> RESOLVED, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0090.html as resolution to ISSUE-44
16:38:04 <benadida> Alistair: ISSUE-44, originally covered transtivity of skosbroader, but also reflexivity, so all other stuff in ISSUE-44 has been moved to other issues. We can deal with remaining issues separately.
16:39:22 <benadida> Tom: what about issues 68,69,70.
16:39:33 <benadida> Alistair: could put them on agenda and talk about them, wait for feedback.
16:40:01 <benadida> ACTION: Alistair to propose an approach to clarify which aspects of the extension module should be in scope for the candidate recommendation package.
16:40:03 <benadida> --continues
16:40:08 <benadida> ACTION: Alistair and Guus to prepare material for next week on Concept Schemes vs OWL Ontologies
16:40:10 <benadida> --continues
16:40:18 <benadida> ACTION: Guus to write up the issue [of Label Resource] and add to the issue list. [recorded in 
16:40:18 <benadida> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action01]
16:40:19 <benadida> --continues
16:41:09 <benadida> ACTION: Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action10]
16:41:30 <benadida> -- continues
16:41:53 <benadida> Tom: new SKOS issues
16:42:05 <benadida> ... propose that we postpone until future telecon
16:42:15 <Ralph> scribenick: ralph
16:42:21 <Ralph> Topic: RDFa
16:42:33 <Ralph> Ben: Mark and I have been discussing some final details
16:42:49 <Ralph> ... I expect to work on the Syntax draft later today
16:42:59 <Ralph> ... Mark and I have some differences of opinion
16:43:14 <Ralph> ACTION: Ben and Michael to address comments by Tom [regarding maintenance of wiki document http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa] recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action05]
16:43:16 <Ralph> -- continues
16:43:21 <Ralph> ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in 
16:43:21 <Ralph> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action03]
16:43:26 <Ralph> -- continues (in progress)
16:43:32 <Ralph> ACTION: Ben to distribute RDFa syntax draft to reviewers by Monday [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-swd-minutes.html#action10]
16:43:34 <Ralph> -- continues
16:43:42 <Ralph> ACTION: Diego to review RDFa syntax document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action12]
16:43:43 <Ralph> -- continues
16:43:49 <Ralph> ACTION: Ed to review RDFa syntax document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action13]
16:43:50 <Ralph> -- continues
16:43:55 <Ralph> ACTION: Ben to prepare the email to request the decision for publishing on Feb 5th [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/15-swd-minutes.html#action18]
16:43:58 <Ralph> -- continues
16:44:07 <Ralph> Tom: should we change the date?
16:44:24 <Ralph> Ben: let's wait to pick a date until there's actually a draft in the hands of the reviewers
16:44:48 <Ralph> Tom: do you want to elaborate on the nature of the open issues?
16:45:03 <Ralph> Ben: these are edge cases but they seem to be important to resolve in order to phrase the model correctly
16:45:08 <Ralph> ... they have to do with "chaining"
16:45:28 <Ralph> ... e.g. "I know a Person who knows a Person named Ben who knows a person named Ralph"
16:45:53 <Ralph> ... there are different opinions on whether @href completes triples that might appear higher up in the parse tree
16:46:08 <Ralph> ... these are fairly advanced uses of RDFa and won't affect initial users
16:46:14 <Ralph> ... this issue has some sub-issues
16:46:21 <Ralph> ... how to handle @rel='next'
16:46:39 <Ralph> ... it's critical to some consumers that the existing keywords be supported
16:46:48 <Ralph> ... details of how to do this need to be finalized
16:47:13 <Ralph> ... Mark is holding us to high standards of perfection for the document
16:47:26 <Ralph> scribenick: benadida
16:47:38 <benadida> Topic: Recipes
16:47:47 <benadida> ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
16:47:50 <benadida> --continues
16:48:01 <benadida> Ralph: decided not to change anything in current editor's draft
16:48:21 <benadida> Diego: want to study the issue a bit more.
16:48:29 <benadida> ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in 
16:48:29 <benadida> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action03]
16:48:38 <benadida> --continues
16:48:41 <benadida> Ralph: +2 months
16:48:54 <benadida> ... not going to make progress until w3c systems folks have finished bringing a DB in house.
16:48:58 <benadida> ... on hold.
16:49:06 <benadida> ACTION: Jon and Diego to propose a decision on publishing the next Recipes draft by next week, i.e. by 22 January [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/15-swd-minutes.html#action23]
16:49:19 <benadida> --done
16:50:35 <Ralph> -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/16 ISSUE 16
16:51:11 <Ralph> (content negotiation using User-agent)
16:51:20 <benadida> Ed: there are rewrite rules in the recipes for serving up vocabs that look for IE, and return proper RDF mime type, ignoring accept headers from IE.
16:51:30 <benadida> ... small issue.
16:52:12 <benadida> Tom: PROPOSAL to publish Recipes as WD.
16:52:19 <benadida> ... objections?
16:52:22 <benadida> [none]
16:52:27 <benadida> ...abstentions?
16:52:32 <benadida> [none]
16:52:33 <ed> not i :)
16:52:42 <benadida> RESOLVED to publish Recipes as WD.
16:53:55 <benadida> Guus: we need to send out emails to relevant mailing lists
16:54:43 <benadida> ACTION: Alistair and Diego to solicit feedback via mailing lists on WD
16:55:42 <Ralph> s/RESOLUTION: SKOS published as WD/RESOLUTION: SKOS Reference published as WD/
16:56:31 <benadida> Topic: Vocabulary Management
16:56:38 <benadida> ACTION: Vit and Elisa to include in the document all the target sections plus an allocation of sections to people and potentially a standard structure for sections [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action07]
16:56:49 <ed> s/proper RDF mime type/HTML representation/
16:57:17 <benadida> --continues
16:57:18 <benadida> Vit: had a call, and another scheduled to work on changes to draft.
16:57:48 <benadida> ADJOURNED
16:58:19 <benadida> Guus: in a position to review our schedule.
16:58:45 <benadida> ACTION: Tom to put schedule review on agenda.
16:59:02 <benadida> s/Tom/Chairs/
16:59:14 <Zakim> -DLRubin
16:59:17 <Zakim> -aliman
16:59:18 <Zakim> -ed
16:59:19 <Zakim> -Quentin
16:59:20 <Zakim> -Vit
16:59:21 <Zakim> -TomB
16:59:23 <Zakim> -berrueta
16:59:24 <ed> ed has left #swd
16:59:25 <Zakim> -JonP
16:59:26 <Zakim> -Clay
16:59:28 <Zakim> -Guus
16:59:30 <Zakim> -Antoine_Isaac
16:59:36 <Ralph> zakim, list attendees
16:59:36 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been TomB, +2242aaaa, Quentin, Ralph, Antoine_Isaac, aliman, Ben, DLRubin, Vit, Guus, berrueta, JonP, Clay, ed
16:59:55 <Ralph> rrsagent, please draft minutes
16:59:55 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html Ralph
17:00:05 <aliman> ralph, I've just commited a new revision of http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20080118 with numbering done
17:00:06 <dlrubin> dlrubin has left #swd
17:00:16 <Ralph> thanks, Alistair
17:00:56 <TomB> Ben, any issues with the agenda?
17:03:38 <Zakim> -Ralph
17:03:40 <Zakim> -Ben
17:03:41 <Zakim> SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
17:03:42 <Zakim> Attendees were TomB, +2242aaaa, Quentin, Ralph, Antoine_Isaac, aliman, Ben, DLRubin, Vit, Guus, berrueta, JonP, Clay, ed
17:03:52 <Ralph> zakim, bye
17:03:54 <Zakim> Zakim has left #swd
17:03:59 <TomB> Ralph, thanks!
17:05:41 <TomB> Ralph, I have a quick question about W3C - can we open a side channel?
17:11:59 <Antoine> Antoine has left #swd
19:29:34 <Ralph> rrsagent, bye
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> I see 22 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-actions.rdf :
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Alistair to add editorial note linking ISSUE-44 [1]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-17-16
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ralph get SKOS WD published [2]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-20-42
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Guus to schedule to discussion on the notation (syntax) used in SKOS examples in Reference and Primer in two weeks time, i.e. on 29 January [3]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-22-24
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Alistair and Guus write draft section in primer on relationship between SKOS concepts and OWL classes for OWL DL users [4]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-22-47
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Margherita to review the SKOS primer [5]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-22-59
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Antoine to track the resolutions to ISSUE 36 [6]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-25-51
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Alistair to propose an approach to clarify which aspects of the extension module should be in scope for the candidate recommendation package. [7]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-40-01
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Alistair and Guus to prepare material for next week on Concept Schemes vs OWL Ontologies [8]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-40-08
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Guus to write up the issue [of Label Resource] and add to the issue list. [recorded in  [9]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-40-18
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action10] [10]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-41-09
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ben and Michael to address comments by Tom [regarding maintenance of wiki document http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa] recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action05] [11]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-43-14
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in  [12]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-43-21
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ben to distribute RDFa syntax draft to reviewers by Monday [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-swd-minutes.html#action10] [13]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-43-32
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Diego to review RDFa syntax document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action12] [14]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-43-42
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ed to review RDFa syntax document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action13] [15]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-43-49
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ben to prepare the email to request the decision for publishing on Feb 5th [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/15-swd-minutes.html#action18] [16]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-43-55
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [17]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-47-47
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in  [18]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-48-29
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jon and Diego to propose a decision on publishing the next Recipes draft by next week, i.e. by 22 January [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/15-swd-minutes.html#action23] [19]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-49-06
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Alistair and Diego to solicit feedback via mailing lists on WD [20]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-54-43
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Vit and Elisa to include in the document all the target sections plus an allocation of sections to people and potentially a standard structure for sections [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action07] [21]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-56-38
19:29:34 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Tom to put schedule review on agenda. [22]
19:29:34 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-irc#T16-58-45