15:59:14 RRSAgent has joined #rdfa 15:59:14 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-irc 15:59:19 Zakim has joined #rdfa 15:59:25 zakim, this will be rdfa 15:59:25 ok, Ralph; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 15:59:34 Meeting RDF-in-XHTML Task Force 15:59:38 Meeting: RDF-in-XHTML Task Force 16:00:02 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jan/0003.html 16:00:18 -> http://www.w3.org/2007/12/20-rdfa-minutes.html previous 2007-12-20 16:00:28 rrsagent, please make record public 16:00:47 SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has now started 16:00:54 +??P4 16:01:05 zakim, i am ??P4 16:01:05 +msporny; got it 16:01:28 +Ralph 16:01:32 -msporny 16:01:33 +msporny 16:03:22 +McCarron 16:04:28 Regrets: Michael, Mark 16:04:40 Regrets+ Simone 16:05:46 benadida has joined #rdfa 16:06:24 Manu: I think Ivan is suggesting that @instanceof does apply to @resource in some cases 16:06:27 +benadida 16:06:46 ... whereas Ben and I think it is simpler if @instanceof never applies to @resource 16:06:50 s/Ivan/Mark and Ivan/ 16:07:08 Shane: I interpret Mark's argument as saying @instanceof applies to the subject 16:07:50 Ben: where Mark splits @rel and @resource, I don't see a use case 16:08:37 s/ and Ivan// 16:09:10 Ben: I'm concerned about multiple ways of expressing the same thing unless it enables a new use case 16:09:45 Regrets+ Steven 16:10:34 Topic: Action Review 16:11:43 [DONE] ACTION: Ben to propose a solution for running tests locally [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/20-rdfa-minutes.html#action16] 16:11:59 [DONE] ACTION: Ben to update primer to remove Libby's email address [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/20-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] 16:12:08 Ben: I looked and didn't find it in the Primer 16:12:18 Manu: was a blanket action; it's definitely in the Syntax doc 16:13:21 ACTION: Manu to change Libby's email address to Michael's in all test cases [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/20-rdfa-minutes.html#action05] 16:13:28 --continues 16:13:39 Manu: only appears in test 19; I've sent mail to Michael 16:13:48 [DONE] ACTION: Manu to check for BASE test cases [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/20-rdfa-minutes.html#action15] 16:14:32 Manu: I've proposed two tests, but apparently we previously resolved to not support xml:base (test73) 16:14:41 ... test72 uses @base 16:14:50 ACTION: Shane to update syntax doc to remove Libby's email address (and replace it with Michael's) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/20-rdfa-minutes.html#action07] 16:14:52 -- continues 16:15:35 ACTION: Ben followup with Fabien on getting his RDFa GRDDL transform transferred to W3C [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action01] 16:15:38 -- continues 16:15:47 ACTION: Ben to add status of various implementations on rdfa.info [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/04-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] 16:15:58 Ben: Michael has volunteered to work on the implementation report 16:16:02 ... on the wiki 16:16:14 ... so rdfa.info might point to or copy the wiki 16:16:18 ACTION: Ben to respond to comment on follow-your-nose [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/06-rdfa-minutes.html#action02] 16:16:20 -- continues 16:16:27 Ben: draft under discussion 16:17:23 Shane: Mark wants the resource at the profile URI to be something useful 16:18:07 ... I've said this several times too; it's just a matter of getting it done 16:18:32 ... he'd also like to see the resource be content-negotiated 16:19:02 ... and he suggests we also support the GRDDL alternative of 16:19:28 Ben: but GRDDL's XHTML mechanism is @profile 16:19:59 ACTION: Ben to set up a proper scribe schedule [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action01] 16:20:01 -- continues 16:20:17 ACTION: Michael to create "Microformats done right -- unambiguous taxonomies via RDF" on the wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/23-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] 16:20:18 -- continues 16:20:23 ACTION: Ralph followup with Dublin Core on what's going on with their namespace URI [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/06-rdfa-minutes.html#action01] 16:20:24 -- continues 16:20:57 [SWDWG] ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action03] 16:21:07 Ben: I've done a draft implementation report 16:21:15 [SWDWG] ACTION: Ben to update RDFa schedule in wiki http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa#RDFa_schedule [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action04] 16:21:25 Ben: I've updated the schedule 16:21:40 [SWDWG] ACTION: Ben and Michael to address comments by Tom [regarding maintenance of wiki document http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action05] 16:22:40 -- continues 16:23:05 -McCarron 16:23:07 +ShaneM 16:23:29 Topic: @src 16:24:18 Ben: defer decision until more folk are present 16:24:40 Topic: latest Syntax editors' draft 16:24:51 Manu: I have some feedback, which I'll put in mail 16:24:54 ShaneM has joined #rdfa 16:24:58 ... it's becoming a long document 16:25:16 ... looks good at a high level; I need more time to look at the detail 16:25:26 ... it says what I thought we'd all agreed on 16:26:18 ... outstanding issues; @instanceof applying to @resource, changing email addresses, dpedia examples use p: as namespace prefix which might confuse some readers 16:26:54 Ben: I looked at the editors' draft and think it's coming together nicely. Also have some small examples 16:26:58 s/examples/comments 16:27:42 Topic: test cases 16:27:51 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jan/0004.html 16:28:00 -- test 71 16:28:57 a triple can be generated even if @instanceof and @about is not specified anywhere in the document. 16:29:14 Manu: @href @rel with nothing else generates a triple 16:29:56 Ben: the test is not wrong but it's different from the Creative Commons recommendation 16:30:20 ... so could we add another that uses @rel='license' per the CC recommendation? 16:30:32 Manu: happy to do that once 'license' is in the reserved list 16:30:42 Shane: tell me to add 'license' to the reserved list 16:30:43 [done] 16:31:41 Ben: does SPARQL require whitespace before '.'? 16:32:25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jan/0005.html 16:32:29 RESOLVED: test 71 accepted, pending confirmation of SPARQL whitespace rules 16:32:32 -- test 72 16:32:59 BASE with relative URIs 16:34:53 Ben: recommend dropping '#' for simplification; it's not necessary here 16:35:22 RESOLVED: test 72 accepted, removing unnecessary '#' 16:35:57 http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/ 16:36:22 Manu: we still have some whitespace canonicalization issues 16:36:37 ... test 11 fails under some implementations and passes under others 16:37:20 ... the current test strips all whitespace in the SPARQL but that's not strictly correct per the XHTML rules 16:38:04 ... we could fix this by stripping the whitespace in the HTML 16:38:18 Ralph: the point of this test was not to test whitespace rules, but rather to test XMLliteral 16:38:37 Ben: to test whitespace we could use the XPath whitespace function in the SPARQL 16:39:29 Manu: I'm not sure that it would be correct to create a new test using the XPath function 16:40:00 Ben: it's just a way to write a test that is independent of the parser implementation w.r.t. whitespace preservation 16:40:23 Topic: Schedule 16:40:33 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa#RDFa_schedule schedule 16:41:25 Ben: I'd like us to reach agreement to have an editors' draft for the SWD WG to review by their Jan 15 telecon 16:41:31 ... that's agressive 16:41:42 ... so please get comments to Mark and Shane by this weekend 16:42:17 Did I get disconnected? 16:43:05 Ben: the only open issue we're discussing is the @resource thread in email 16:43:07 'me sees that his link is dying.... 16:44:58 Topic: HTML element 16:45:18 Shane: Ivan observed that the RDFa attributes are not permitted on 16:45:25 ... should this be permitted? 16:45:36 Manu: in one test case I wanted to say "there's a person, me, at this address" 16:45:47 ... e.g. example.org/shane 16:45:57 ... is there a way to set the type of a document as a Person? 16:46:20 ... can you declare the rdf:type of what you're linking to? 16:46:25 Ben: no way currently 16:46:56 ... if you're linking something with a typed relationship, the type of the object might be deducible 16:46:56 shane is here 16:47:24 ... 16:47:45 Ben: we permit @instanceof on 16:48:09 Manu: so if permitted on , why not also on 16:48:19 Shane: I don't think there would be any parser ramifications 16:48:48 ... the HTML WG has never extended the HTML element except for @@ 16:48:56 ... HTML doesn't have @id or @class 16:49:20 Ben: consistency is nice, but let's defer to the HTML WG 16:50:14 Shane: in my opinion it would be find for to permit the RDFa attributes as well as @id and @class; let's see what the HTML WG wants to do 16:50:17 -msporny 16:50:18 [adjourned] 16:50:18 -ShaneM 16:50:23 -benadida 16:50:24 -Ralph 16:50:25 SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has ended 16:50:26 Attendees were msporny, Ralph, McCarron, benadida, ShaneM 16:52:04 benadida has left #rdfa 16:52:14 s/@@/@lang 16:58:24 rrsagent, please draft minutes 16:58:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-minutes.html Ralph 16:59:51 rrsagent, bye 16:59:51 I see 8 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-actions.rdf : 16:59:51 ACTION: Manu to change Libby's email address to Michael's in all test cases [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/20-rdfa-minutes.html#action05] [1] 16:59:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-irc#T16-13-21 16:59:51 ACTION: Shane to update syntax doc to remove Libby's email address (and replace it with Michael's) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/20-rdfa-minutes.html#action07] [2] 16:59:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-irc#T16-14-50 16:59:51 ACTION: Ben followup with Fabien on getting his RDFa GRDDL transform transferred to W3C [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action01] [3] 16:59:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-irc#T16-15-35 16:59:51 ACTION: Ben to add status of various implementations on rdfa.info [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/04-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] [4] 16:59:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-irc#T16-15-47 16:59:51 ACTION: Ben to respond to comment on follow-your-nose [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/06-rdfa-minutes.html#action02] [5] 16:59:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-irc#T16-16-18 16:59:51 ACTION: Ben to set up a proper scribe schedule [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action01] [6] 16:59:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-irc#T16-19-59 16:59:51 ACTION: Michael to create "Microformats done right -- unambiguous taxonomies via RDF" on the wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/23-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] [7] 16:59:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-irc#T16-20-17 16:59:51 ACTION: Ralph followup with Dublin Core on what's going on with their namespace URI [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/06-rdfa-minutes.html#action01] [8] 16:59:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/03-rdfa-irc#T16-20-23 16:59:53 zakim, bye 16:59:53 Zakim has left #rdfa