Teleconference.2008.03.19/Agenda

From OWL

Contents 1 Call in details 2 Agenda 3 Next Week(s) 4 Regrets

Call in details

• Date of Call: Wednesday March 19, 2008
• Time of Call: 1700 UTC, 10:00 (West US), 13:00 (East US), 17:00 (London), 18:00 (Paris)
• Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
• Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
• Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
• Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
• IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
• Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
• Duration: 90 minutes
• Chair: Ian Horrocks
• Scribe: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Scribe List)
• Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2008.03.19/Agenda

Agenda

• ADMIN (20 min)
  • Roll call
  • Agenda amendments
  • Europeans: Note, due to daylight savings time meeting will be 1 hour earlier for the next three weeks, ie, for the meeting starting next week until the end of March.
  • PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (12 March)
  • F2F: Registration Fees and Signup
  • Action items status
    • Pending Review Actions
      • Action 103 Check whether all OWL 1.0 ontologies are representable in RDF / Peter Patel-Schneider
      • Action 106 Review the XML doc and the fragment / Achille Fokoue
      • Action 107 Review the XML document / Bijan Parsia
      • Action 110 Review the fragments document / Michael Smith
    • Due and overdue Actions
      • Action 43 Develop scripts to extract test cases from wiki, coordinating with Bijan, Jeremy, Alan / Sandro HawkeSend
      • Action 72 Put his use case for punning onto a wiki page (for reasoning associated with punned properties, and the question about object data property punning vs annotation properties) / Alan Ruttenberg
      • Action 76 Arrange HP review of OWL Prime page / Jeremy Carroll
      • Action 86 Send proposal for issue-91 ontology property / Jeremy Carroll
      • Action 90 Summarize problem with bnodes in ISSUE-3 vs bnodes in OWL list / Jeremy Carroll
      • Action 100 Put n3 version of rules on wiki with pointer to documentation. All to review and discuss via email / James Hendler
      • Action 101 Summarize current state of issue 91 / Alan Ruttenberg
      • Action 102 Work with Michael to clarify semantics of deprecatedclass so that peter becomes happy / James Hendler
      • Action 104 Start editing the Fragments document by the end of next week / Achille Fokoue
      • Action 105 To review primer / Deborah McGuinness
      • Action 108 Review the XML document / Sandro Hawke
      • Action 109 Review just the fragment / Bijan Parsia
• Raised Issues (15 minutes)
• Proposals to Resolve Issues
  • Issue 102 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Mar/0149.html
  • Issue 79 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Mar/0191.html
  • Issue 78 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Mar/0194.html
  • Issue 75 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Mar/0185.html
  • Issue 16 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Mar/0168.html
• General Discussions (30 min)
  • Next steps towards working drafts
    • Reviews (see Actions above)
    • Status of fragments document
    • Formal votes to publish
• Issues (20 min)
  • Resolved Editorial Issues
  • Issue Discussions
    • Issue 100 Should there be valid OWL DL ontologies that can not be expressed as OWL DL ontologies in RDF graph form
    • Issue 71 create datarange of literals matching given language range
• Additional other business (5 min)

Next Week(s)

• General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
  • Fragments and Conformance
  • Imports
  • OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full compatibility)
  • Versioning
  • Easy Keys
  • Rich Annotations
  • Test Cases

Regrets

• Evan Wallace will have to leave early
• Bijan Parsia at risk (family visiting)
• Jeff Z. Pan at risk (family duty)
• Markus Krötzsch (caught a cold :-( )

back to Meetings