LC3 Responses/OC1

From OWL
Revision as of 19:19, 5 October 2009 by Sebastian Rudolph (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

To: Olivier.Corby@sophia.inria.fr
CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Subject: [LC response] To Olivier Corby

Dear Olivier,

Thank you for your comment
     <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Oct/0001.html>
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

Thanks a lot for spotting those typos. We corrected them as suggested. Find the corresponding diff under:

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Primer&diff=25902&oldid=25887

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.

Regards,
Sebastian
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group



CUT AND PASTE THE BODY OF THE MESSAGE (I.E. FROM "Dear" TO "Group") INTO THE BODY OF AN EMAIL MESSAGE. SET THE To:, CC:, AND Subject: LINES ACCORDINGLY.

PLEASE TRY TO REPLY IN A WAY THAT WILL ALLOW THREADING TO WORK APPROPRIATELY, I.E., SO THAT YOUR REPLY CONTINUES THE THREAD STARTED BY THE ORIGINAL COMMENT EMAIL


I have found some typos in OWL 2 Primer :

OWL provides a mechanism by which to they are considered

Property restrictins -> restrictions

esentially -> essentially

subClassStatement -> SubClassOf statement


Olivier