LC3 Responses/HK1

From OWL
Revision as of 19:49, 11 August 2009 by IanHorrocks (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

To: holger@topquadrant.com
CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Subject: [LC response] To Holger Knublauch

Dear Holger,

Thank you for your comment
     <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jul/0007.html>
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

The working group has decided to take up your suggestion and define an RDF specification of the OWL 2 vocabulary in the RDF/XML exchange format. A draft of this specification can be found at [1]. The intention is that, when OWL 2 becomes a recommendation, the specification will be placed at [2].

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Owl2DotOwlDevel
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.

Regards,
Ian Horrocks
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group



CUT AND PASTE THE BODY OF THE MESSAGE (I.E. FROM "Dear" TO "Group") INTO THE BODY OF AN EMAIL MESSAGE. SET THE To:, CC:, AND Subject: LINES ACCORDINGLY.

PLEASE TRY TO REPLY IN A WAY THAT WILL ALLOW THREADING TO WORK APPROPRIATELY, I.E., SO THAT YOUR REPLY CONTINUES THE THREAD STARTED BY THE ORIGINAL COMMENT EMAIL


I would appreciate if the OWL working group would deliver (and maintain) 
an RDF specification of the OWL 2 vocabulary, as discussed below, in the 
RDF/XML exchange format.  While the OWL namespace document itself cannot 
be changed at this stage, I would suggest that a new version of that 
file is placed on some other W3C site as long as OWL 2 is still evolving.