Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Teleconference.2009.03.11/Agenda
From OWL
Call in details
When joining please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC
- Date of Call: Wednesday March 11, 2009
- Time of Call: 1700 UTC, 10:00 (West US), 13:00 (East US), 17:00 (London), 18:00 (Paris) NOTE CHANGE!!!
- Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
- Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
- Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
- Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
- IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
- Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
- Duration: 90 minutes
- Chair: Alan Ruttenberg
- Scribe: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Scribe List)
- Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2009.03.11/Agenda
Agenda
- Admin
- Roll call
- Agenda amendments?
- PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (4 March)
- Action items status
- Pending Review Actions
- Action 281 Send out a response to XML Schema after the f2f / Peter Patel-Schneider
- Action 295 Prepare a reply to comment 20 / Boris Motik
- Action 301 Contact Andy Seaborn and try to make sure he's happy with our work on rdf:text, and will talk to use about any remaining issues / Jie Bao
- Action 298 Make fixes for 61 and craft response / Ian Horrocks
- Action 305 Tell us how much naming of datatypes would cost / Peter Patel-Schneider
- Action 303 Flesh out the response to 58 / Ian Horrocks
- Action 304 Craft the response to 28 and 48 / Ian Horrocks
- Due and overdue Actions
- Action 270 Add new examples in response to IH1 / Boris Motik
- Action 292 Talk to RIF to see what datatypes in OWL must not be in OWL-RL / Sandro Hawke
- Action 300 Send wg apology to jim re: initial version of http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC_Responses/JH1 / Alan Ruttenberg
- Action 299 Find and fix the to-wiki-links Jeremy complains about / Sandro Hawke
- Action 283 Add an ontology header and a comment to each of the test cases from WebOnt that are prevented from being syntactically OWL 2 DL only be the absence of this header and create content for errata on webont tests / Michael Smith
- Pending Review Actions
- Datatypes
- Draft Proposal: OWL 2 datatypes will have disjointness as in XML Schema (i.e., the datatypes xsd:string, xsd:boolean, owl:real, xsd:float, xsd:double, xsd:dateTimeStamp, xsd:hexBinary, xsd:base64Binary, and xsd:anyURI are pairwise disjoint), as requested in LC Comments 22 and 24.
- Currently xsd:string, xsd:boolean, owl:real, xsd:dateTimeStamp, xsd:hexBinary, and xsd:anyURI are pairwise disjoint. This separates out xsd:float, xsd:double, and xsd:base64Binary.
- Draft Proposal: Remove the datatype owl:realPlus from OWL 2, as it was introduced to unify floats, doubles, and other numbers.
- Proposal: Add named datatypes to OWL 2 - one definition per datatype not in the datatype map, acyclic, as per email from Boris and mentioned in LC Comments 51 and 62.
- Draft Proposal: OWL 2 datatypes will have disjointness as in XML Schema (i.e., the datatypes xsd:string, xsd:boolean, owl:real, xsd:float, xsd:double, xsd:dateTimeStamp, xsd:hexBinary, xsd:base64Binary, and xsd:anyURI are pairwise disjoint), as requested in LC Comments 22 and 24.
- Plans documents
- Status of ongoing changes to Syntax
- Status of rdf:text
- Quick Reference Guide - Solicitation for reviewers
- Document Overview -Proposed: Publish FPWD
- New Features and Rationale - getting ready for LC publication in mid-April?
- Manchester Syntax - ready for publication in mid-April?
- Data Range Extension: Linear Equations - ready for publication in mid-April?
- RDF-Based Semantics - ready for LC publication in mid-April?
- Last Call Comments (see [1] and Responses to Last Call Comments)
- Responses ready to send - for quick approval
- Draft responses for discussion and potential approval
- Responses being drafted and/or awaiting document editing actions
- Comments that may require policy decisions
- Work in progress blocking sending of responses
- Other responses that should be moving forward
- Non-positive Acknowledgments
- MK1 47 Functional properties for keys see Bijan's comment, notes from followup with Marijke
- JR8-2 54 Only one exchange syntax (second reply) Our first response, response to response, Sandro's comment
- RM1 51(a) Data properties should be functional
- Test Cases
- Problems with approved test cases?
- Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"?
- How to organize related tests - e.g. same input but different results for DL versus Full/RL (e.g. punning/sameas)
- PROPOSED: Approve some/all of the test cases currently in the test queue
- Coordination with RIF
- Organization
- LC comments on rdf:text
- Datatypes - Sandro update
- Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder)
- owl:rational support
- xsd:decimal precision
- owl:dateTime name
- rdf:XMLLiteral support
- OWL 2 RL Datatypes
- Additional other business
Regrets
back to Meetings