Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Teleconference.2008.02.13/Agenda
From OWL
Call in details
If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC
- Date of Call: Wednesday February 13, 2007
- Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US), 18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
- Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
- Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
- Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
- Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
- IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
- Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
- Duration: 90 minutes
- Chair: Ian Horrocks
- Scribe: Uli Sattler (Scribe List)
- Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2008.02.13/Agenda
Agenda
- ADMIN (15 min)
- Roll call
- Agenda amendments
- PROPOSED: Accept Previous Previous Minutes (30 January)
- PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (6 February)
- Washington F2F (10 min)
- OWLED Registration Page
- Observers
- Registration and/or Sponsorship: See Discussion in 30 January teleconference
- Attendees
- Action items status
- Pending Review Actions
- Action 78 Explain what delta to 1.0 semantics means / Michael Schneider
- Action 80 Will describe an approach to a "operationall semantics" approach to OWL Full / James Hendler
- Action 81 Send out proposal for minimal change for issue-3 / Peter Patel-Schneider
- Action 82 Edit the secification to mention the well-known ontology properties in the spirit of OWL 1.0 and thus possibly resolve ISSUE-91 / Boris Motik
- Action 83 Send email describing what may be lost if facets are only applied to datatypeURI / Mike Smith
- Action 84 Change the spec to add a table with facet-datatype compatibility / Boris Motik
- Due and overdue Actions
- Action 43 Develop scripts to extract test cases from wiki, coordinating with Bijan, Jeremey, Alan / Sandro Hawke
- Action 62 Add test guidelines to working group to agenda for next week / Alan Ruttenberg
- Action 72 Put his use case for punning onto a wiki page (for reasoning associated with punned properties, and the question about object data property punning vs annotation properties) / Alan Ruttenberg
- Pending Review Actions
- Proposals to Resolve Issues (15 mins)
- Issue 3 Lack of anonymous individuals (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0029.html)
- Issue 91 Spec lacks ontology properties (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0062.html)
- Issue 95 No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0063.html)
- General Discussions (30 min)
- Fragments and Conformance (Continued) see list of questions/topics
- Issues (15 min)
- Raised Issues
- Resolved Editorial Issues
- Issue Discussions
- Issue 68 mapping rules are non-monotonic (more precisely, this relates to the mapping of the qualified cardinality constructors)
- Issue 16 Entity annotations status
- Issue 69 punning is incompatible with OWL Full
- Issue 90 Spec lacks 'Deprecated' marker for classes, properties and datatypes (OWL 1.0 compatibility)
- Issue 94 Issues surrounding roundtripping
- Additional other business (5 min)
Next Week(s)
- General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
- Fragments and Conformance
- Imports
- OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full compatibility)
- Versioning
- Easy Keys
- Rich Annotations
- Test Cases
Regrets
JeffPan, ElisaKendall (traveling), Markus Krötzsch Ratnesh Sahay
back to Meetings