Teleconference.2008.02.13/Agenda

From OWL

Call in details

• Date of Call: Wednesday February 13, 2007
• Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US), 18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
• Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
• Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
• Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
• Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
• IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
• Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
• Duration: 90 minutes
• Chair: Ian Horrocks
• Scribe: Uli Sattler (Scribe List)
• Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2008.02.13/Agenda

Agenda

• ADMIN (15 min)
  • Roll call
  • Agenda amendments
  • PROPOSED: Accept Previous Previous Minutes (30 January)
  • PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (6 February)
  • Washington F2F (10 min)
    • OWLED Registration Page
    • Observers
    • Registration and/or Sponsorship: See Discussion in 30 January teleconference
    • Attendees
  • Action items status
    • Pending Review Actions
      • Action 78 Explain what delta to 1.0 semantics means / Michael Schneider
      • Action 80 Will describe an approach to a "operationall semantics" approach to OWL Full / James Hendler
      • Action 81 Send out proposal for minimal change for issue-3 / Peter Patel-Schneider
      • Action 82 Edit the secification to mention the well-known ontology properties in the spirit of OWL 1.0 and thus possibly resolve ISSUE-91 / Boris Motik
      • Action 83 Send email describing what may be lost if facets are only applied to datatypeURI / Mike Smith
      • Action 84 Change the spec to add a table with facet-datatype compatibility / Boris Motik
    • Due and overdue Actions
      • Action 43 Develop scripts to extract test cases from wiki, coordinating with Bijan, Jeremey, Alan / Sandro Hawke
      • Action 62 Add test guidelines to working group to agenda for next week / Alan Ruttenberg
      • Action 72 Put his use case for punning onto a wiki page (for reasoning associated with punned properties, and the question about object data property punning vs annotation properties) / Alan Ruttenberg

• Proposals to Resolve Issues (15 mins)
  • Issue 3 Lack of anonymous individuals (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0029.html)
  • Issue 91 Spec lacks ontology properties (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0062.html)
  • Issue 95 No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0063.html)
• General Discussions (30 min)
  • Fragments and Conformance (Continued) see list of questions/topics
• Issues (15 min)
  • Raised Issues
  • Resolved Editorial Issues
  • Issue Discussions
    • Issue 68 mapping rules are non-monotonic (more precisely, this relates to the mapping of the qualified cardinality constructors)
    • Issue 16 Entity annotations status
    • Issue 69 punning is incompatible with OWL Full
    • Issue 90 Spec lacks 'Deprecated' marker for classes, properties and datatypes (OWL 1.0 compatibility)
    • Issue 94 Issues surrounding roundtripping
• Additional other business (5 min)

Next Week(s)

• General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
  • Fragments and Conformance
  • Imports
  • OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full compatibility)
  • Versioning
  • Easy Keys
  • Rich Annotations
  • Test Cases

Regrets

JeffPan, ElisaKendall (traveling), Markus Krötzsch Ratnesh Sahay

back to Meetings