LC Responses/MS6

From OWL
Jump to: navigation, search

To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de> CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org Subject: [LC response] To Michael Schneider

Dear Michael,

Thank you for your comment

    <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0007.html>

on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

Thanks for pointing the divergence between the nomenclature in the OWL 2 Last Call documents and that used previously. We have moved from lexical value to lexical form to be consistent with OWL 1, XML Schema datatypes, and RDF.

The diffs for the Syntax, Direct Semantics, RDF-based Semantics and Conformance can be found at [1], [2], [3] and [4] respectively.

The working group views this as an editorial change.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.

Regards, Peter F. Patel-Schneider on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Syntax&diff=18519&oldid=18157

[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Direct_Semantics&diff=18518&oldid=18158

[3] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=RDF-Based_Semantics&diff=18492&oldid=18491

[4] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Conformance_and_Test_Cases&diff=18578&oldid=18577