Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
F2F2 Agenda
From OWL
See F2F2 and F2F2 Minutes
Day 1
- 09:00 - 09:15 Welcome, local arrangements, introductions
- 09:15 - 10:45 Publication Schedule review of and vote for resolution to publish Primer, Fragments and XML Serialization as First Public Working Drafts. Necessary outcome: List of editorial changes to be made before publication on April 8.
- 10:45 - 11:15 Coffee
- 11:15 - 13:00 Publication Schedule review of and vote for resolution to publish Primer, Fragments and XML Serialization as First Public Working Drafts (continued).
- 13:00 - 14:00 Lunch
- 14:00 - 15:45 Roadmap and design principles
- Issue 51 Language Name
- Issue 100 Should there be valid OWL DL ontologies that can not be expressed as OWL DL ontologies in RDF graph form
- Review timeline
- Are we going to try to do a last call in 4 months, and if so are we happy with the tradeoffs that may need to be made.
- A backwards compatibility goal: Take an OWL DL 1.0 ontology O, serialize it to RDF and reverse map to an OWL DL 1.1 ontology O' in functional style syntax. O and O' have the same models as defined by their respective semantics. Possible exception: Annotations.
- 15:45 - 16:15 Coffee
- 16:15 - 18:00 OWL 1.1 Full Semantics Issues
- 18:30 - 19:15 Drinks/Dinner
Day 2
- 09:00 - 10:45 RDF Mapping Issues
- Issue 17, Issue 18, Issue 65 & Issue 68 object and datatype role punning / property typing / vocabulary duplication / mapping rules are non-monotonic
- Proposal: no object-datatype role punning
- Issue 89 & Issue 19 In the RDF mapping (*,rdf:type,owl:Class) triples do not map to axioms / declarations
- Proposal: Declarations map to rdf:type triples
- Issue 66 mapping inconsistencies
- Proposal: round tripping preserves models
- Issue 86 RDF/XML serialization for anonymous inverse properties
- Proposal: Mike Smith's solution
- Issue 94 Issues surrounding roundtripping
- Proposal: round tripping preserves models; it may not preserve structure if this is incompatible with other design goals
- Issue 96 OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent
- Issue 17, Issue 18, Issue 65 & Issue 68 object and datatype role punning / property typing / vocabulary duplication / mapping rules are non-monotonic
- 10:45 - 11:15 Coffee
- 11:15 - 13:00 Other Issues
- 13:00 - 14:00 Lunch
- 14:00 - 14:50 Task Force Report: Imports and Versioning
- 14:50 - 15:45 Task Force Report: User Facing Documents
- 15:45 - 16:15 Coffee
- 16:15 - 18:00 Additional Features, including Easy Keys, Rich Annotations and N-ary Datatypes
Possible topics
- Approve FPWD of Primer, Fragments, XML Syntax
- RDF mapping
- Strategy: Work on xslt as primary work product?
- coverage (are all OWL 1.0 DL ontologies in graph form mappable to OWL 1.1 DL)
- "monmonotonicity"
- backwards compatability
- use of reification
- relationship between DL and Full semantics
- retention of previous characteristics
- characterisation on OWL 1.1 extensions
- importing
- versioning
- annotations
- "no semantics"
- rich annotations
- Additional features
- EasyKeys
- N-ary data predicates
- Steps to Candidate Recommendations for documents
- Notes versus Rec