ISSUE-97
GRDDL
Add GRDDL to OWL/XML Syntax
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Jie Bao
- Opened on:
- 2008-03-04
- Description:
In my view, a GRDDL transform should be provided, using the appropriate namespace, to convert the XML syntax into RDF/XML. See http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#ns-bind
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-141 on Alan Ruttenberg to Explore whether a simple transformation via XSLT would work - due 2008-05-01, closed- Related emails:
- Re: review of Document Overview (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2009-04-03)
- Re: review of Document Overview (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2009-04-02)
- Re: review of Document Overview (from sandro@w3.org on 2009-04-02)
- Re: review of Document Overview (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2009-04-02)
- Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2009-01-28)
- Re: Trying to understand the GRDDL Problem (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-11-05)
- Trying to understand the GRDDL Problem (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-11-05)
- Re: This may be relevant to both owl/xml issues: Issue-97 and Issue-109 (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-06-25)
- This may be relevant to both owl/xml issues: Issue-97 and Issue-109 (from ivan@w3.org on 2008-06-25)
- GRDDL non-action (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-04-25)
- ISSUE-97 (GRDDL): Add GRDDL to OWL/XML Syntax (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-04)
Related notes:
2008-10-24 11:17:42: We keep ISSUE-97 (GRDDL XSLT) open through this Last Call, not needing to make a decision until PR. If necessary, we'll do another Last Call for this -- and doing so won't be a reason not to accept the XSLT. We'll document this decision as necessary to keep expectations properly set, and we'll keep soliciting a suitable XSLT transform.
See: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/meeting/2008-10-23#resolution_6
[Ian Horrocks]
2008-10-24 11:18:59: We won't use GRDDL until we figure out what we're doing with GRDDL. By charter, we'll have to figure out eventually what we're doing with GRDDL. At the namespace document, for now, we can refer to this issue.
See: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/meeting/2008-10-23#resolution_7
[Ian Horrocks]
2009-03-03 13:24:02: RESOLVED: if we can have multiple GRDDL transforms, and systems will behave reasonably with them, then we'll do (1) the spec, (2) on-line transform service (if a good one is produced), AND (3) download single xslt (if a good one is produced); ELSE: we'll do the on-line transform service only.
See: http://www.w3.org/2008/06/wiki_scribe/?source=http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Chatlog_2009-02-24#resolution_16
[Ian Horrocks]
Changelog:
2008-03-04 14:16:50: Created issue 'Add GRDDL to OWL/XML Syntax' nickname GRDDL owned by Jeremy Carroll on product , description 'In my view, a GRDDL transform should be provided, using the appropriate namespace, to convert the XML syntax into RDF/XML. See http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#ns-bind ' non-public [Jeremy Carroll]
2008-10-24 11:17:42: Owner changed to 'Jie Bao' [Ian Horrocks]
2008-10-24 11:17:42: Issue dissociated from any product [Ian Horrocks]
2008-10-24 11:18:59: Issue dissociated from any product [Ian Horrocks]
2009-03-03 13:24:02: Issue dissociated from any product [Ian Horrocks]
2009-03-03 13:24:02: Status changed to 'closed' [Ian Horrocks]