ISSUE-96
OWL1.1 vocabulary names
RESOLVED: OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Michael Schneider
- Opened on:
- 2008-03-02
- Description:
In the RDF mapping, we have the following URIs: * owl11:subObjectPropertyOf * owl11:equivalentObjectProperty * owl11:disjointObjectProperties At least the names for the 2nd URI (singular) and 3rd URI (plural) will perhaps lead to confusion. I suggest to use names close to the existing names in OWL-1.0: * keep "owl11:subObjectPropertyOf", since there is "rdfs:subPropertyOf" * keep "owl11:equivalentObjectProperty", since there is "owl:equivalentProperty" * change "owl11:disjointObjectProperties" to * either "owl11:disjointObjectProperty" to match "owl:equivalentProperty" * or "owl11:dijointObjectPropertyWith" to match "owl:disjointWith" for classes The same changes will then have to be performed for data properties, too, of course. Michael Schneider- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- implementation of several resolutions in OWL 2 Full Wiki (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-25)
- Re: small misspell in the profile document (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-04-07)
- Re: small misspell in the profile document (from ivan@w3.org on 2008-04-07)
- RE: small misspell in the profile document (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-07)
- ISSUE-103 (metamapping): Meta Issue to track other issues related to mapping (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-17)
- RE: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-02)
- Re: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-03-02)
- Re: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-03-02)
- ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-02)
Related notes:
2008-03-18 03:39:21: See issue-103 metamapping for all rdf mapping related issues [Alan Ruttenberg]
2008-04-14 09:17:17: Resolved at F2F2 [1]: owl:propertyDisjointWith will be used for the binary case of disjoint properties [2].
[1]http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/F2F2_Minutes#Issue_96_OWL-1.1_vocabulary_naming_in_RDF_mapping_is_not_consistent
[2]http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs&diff=prev&oldid=5405
[Ian Horrocks]
Display change log