ISSUE-96: RESOLVED: OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent
OWL1.1 vocabulary names
RESOLVED: OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Michael Schneider
- Opened on:
- 2008-03-02
- Description:
- In the RDF mapping, we have the following URIs:
* owl11:subObjectPropertyOf
* owl11:equivalentObjectProperty
* owl11:disjointObjectProperties
At least the names for the 2nd URI (singular) and 3rd URI (plural) will perhaps lead to confusion. I suggest to use names close to the existing names in OWL-1.0:
* keep "owl11:subObjectPropertyOf", since there is "rdfs:subPropertyOf"
* keep "owl11:equivalentObjectProperty", since there is "owl:equivalentProperty"
* change "owl11:disjointObjectProperties" to
* either "owl11:disjointObjectProperty" to match "owl:equivalentProperty"
* or "owl11:dijointObjectPropertyWith" to match "owl:disjointWith" for classes
The same changes will then have to be performed for data properties, too, of course.
Michael Schneider
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- implementation of several resolutions in OWL 2 Full Wiki (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-25)
- Re: small misspell in the profile document (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-04-07)
- Re: small misspell in the profile document (from ivan@w3.org on 2008-04-07)
- RE: small misspell in the profile document (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-07)
- ISSUE-103 (metamapping): Meta Issue to track other issues related to mapping (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-17)
- RE: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-02)
- Re: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-03-02)
- Re: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-03-02)
- ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-02)
Related notes:
See issue-103 metamapping for all rdf mapping related issues
Alan Ruttenberg, 18 Mar 2008, 03:39:21Resolved at F2F2 [1]: owl:propertyDisjointWith will be used for the binary case of disjoint properties [2].
[1]http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/F2F2_Minutes#Issue_96_OWL-1.1_vocabulary_naming_in_RDF_mapping_is_not_consistent
[2]http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs&diff=prev&oldid=5405
Display change log
