ISSUE-96

OWL1.1 vocabulary names

RESOLVED: OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Michael Schneider
Opened on:
2008-03-02
Description:
In the RDF mapping, we have the following URIs:

  * owl11:subObjectPropertyOf
  * owl11:equivalentObjectProperty
  * owl11:disjointObjectProperties

At least the names for the 2nd URI (singular) and 3rd URI (plural) will perhaps lead to confusion. I suggest to use names close to the existing names in OWL-1.0:

  * keep "owl11:subObjectPropertyOf", since there is "rdfs:subPropertyOf" 
 
  * keep "owl11:equivalentObjectProperty", since there is "owl:equivalentProperty"

  * change "owl11:disjointObjectProperties" to
    * either "owl11:disjointObjectProperty" to match "owl:equivalentProperty"
    * or "owl11:dijointObjectPropertyWith" to match "owl:disjointWith" for classes

The same changes will then have to be performed for data properties, too, of course.

Michael Schneider
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. implementation of several resolutions in OWL 2 Full Wiki (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-25)
  2. Re: small misspell in the profile document (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-04-07)
  3. Re: small misspell in the profile document (from ivan@w3.org on 2008-04-07)
  4. RE: small misspell in the profile document (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-07)
  5. ISSUE-103 (metamapping): Meta Issue to track other issues related to mapping (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-17)
  6. RE: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-02)
  7. Re: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-03-02)
  8. Re: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-03-02)
  9. ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-02)

Related notes:

2008-03-18 03:39:21: See issue-103 metamapping for all rdf mapping related issues [Alan Ruttenberg]

2008-04-14 09:17:17: Resolved at F2F2 [1]: owl:propertyDisjointWith will be used for the binary case of disjoint properties [2].
[1]http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/F2F2_Minutes#Issue_96_OWL-1.1_vocabulary_naming_in_RDF_mapping_is_not_consistent
[2]http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs&diff=prev&oldid=5405
[Ian Horrocks]

Display change log ATOM feed


Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Chairs, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker, originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.231 2009/11/16 15:00:54 dom Exp $