ISSUE-90

class and property deprecation

RESOLVED: Spec lacks 'Deprecated' marker for classes, properties and datatypes (OWL 1.0 compatibility)

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Rinke Hoekstra
Opened on:
2007-12-21
Description:
The OWL 1.0 specification provides a mechanism for deprecating classes, properties and datatypes (owl:DeprecatedClass, owl:DeprecatedProperty). See the OWL 1.0 Abstract Syntax document, section 2.3 [1] and the wiki page on ontology versions [2].

This is absent in the OWL 1.1 syntax doc [3]

NOTE: this is a little used feature of OWL 1.0 (tools don't support it, or are agnostic)


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/syntax.html#2.3
[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Ontology_Versions
[3] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: OWL Full Features in QRG (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2009-05-27)
  2. Re: OWL Full Features in QRG (from hendler@cs.rpi.edu on 2009-05-26)
  3. Re: OWL Full Features in QRG (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2009-05-25)
  4. Re: OWL Full Features in QRG (from baojie@gmail.com on 2009-05-22)
  5. Re: are owl:DeprecatedClass and owl:DeprecatedProperty deprecated? (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-10-22)
  6. implementation of several resolutions in OWL 2 Full Wiki (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-25)
  7. A proposal for reintroducing deprecations into OWL 2 and thus addressing ISSUE-90 (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-04-03)
  8. Re: Agenda for Washington F2F (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-03-23)
  9. Re: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-02-13)
  10. RE: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-02-10)
  11. Re: ISSUE-90 and ISSUE-91 backwards compatibility of versioning information: possible fixes (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-01-29)
  12. Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-01-25)
  13. Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-01-25)
  14. Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-01-24)
  15. Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) (from hendler@cs.rpi.edu on 2008-01-24)
  16. Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) (from hendler@cs.rpi.edu on 2008-01-24)
  17. Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-01-24)
  18. Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-01-24)
  19. Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-01-23)
  20. Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) (from hendler@cs.rpi.edu on 2008-01-23)
  21. proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-01-23)
  22. ISSUE-90 and ISSUE-91 backwards compatibility of versioning information: possible fixes (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-01-23)
  23. Re: Agenda amendment re: ISSUE-92, ISSUE-91, and ISSUE-90 (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-01-14)
  24. Agenda amendment re: ISSUE-92, ISSUE-91, and ISSUE-90 (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-01-13)
  25. RE: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-12-21)
  26. Re: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2007-12-21)
  27. RE: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-12-21)
  28. ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-12-21)
  29. ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation): Spec lacks 'Deprecated' marker for classes, properties and datatypes (OWL 1.0 compatibility) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-12-21)

Related notes:

2007-12-21 11:27:16: The RDF mapping document [4] does not specify a mapping either.

[4] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs [Rinke Hoekstra]

2008-01-02 19:09:36: Agreed in telecon 2nd Jan 08 [Ian Horrocks]

2008-04-13 21:06:45: Resolved at F2F2 [1]: "We will hack the RDF mapping and functional syntax as necessary to allow DeprecatedClass and DeprecatedProperty to work as in OWL 1". See Action-130.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/F2F2_Minutes#Slide:_.22Issues_with_OWL_1.1_Full.22 [Ian Horrocks]

Display change log ATOM feed


Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Chairs, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker, originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.231 2009/11/16 15:00:54 dom Exp $