ISSUE-84: REJECTED: UML diagrams in the Structural Specification are not quite UML

UML diagrams

REJECTED: UML diagrams in the Structural Specification are not quite UML

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Conrad Bock

Opened on:

2007-11-30

Description:

The UML diagrams in http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax are are not
quite UML:

- Property names on associations should appear on the opposite ends of
the lines than where they do in the document (where the
multiplicities are shown).

- The UML notation for ordered properties is {ordered}, next to the
property. No adornment means a set.

- Optional properties should have a multiplicity, eg, [0..1] or
[0..*].

- The dashed, hollow-headed arrows in Figures 3 and4 aren't UML
notation.

White diamond has no additional semantics in UML than if it is absent.
Diagrams without white diamonde are less likely to be misintepreted.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. ISSUE-84 (Conrad): UML diagrams in the Structural Specification are not quite UML (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-11-30)

Related notes:

Display change log