ISSUE-81
reification, negative assertions
RESOLVED: reification unwise in negative property assertions
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Jie Bao
- Opened on:
- 2007-11-28
- Description:
The mapping rules for NegativeObjectPropertyAssertions and NegativeDataPropertyAssertions both use reification. It would be possible to map these as membership of the complement of the appropriate hasvalue restriction - avoiding reification. Jeremy sees this as preferable, but might cause round trip issues
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: ISSUE-67 use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation) (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-07-14)
- RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (reification in netagive property assertions) (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-06-25)
- RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (reification in netagive property assertions) (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-06-25)
- Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (reification in netagive property assertions) (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-06-24)
- RDF Reification for annotations and negative property assertions (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-05-28)
- Re: reification/annotations (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-05-28)
- RE: reification/annotations (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-05-28)
- Re: reification/annotations (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-05-27)
- RE: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-05-07)
- Re: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-05-07)
- RE: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-05-07)
- Agenda for TC 2008-05-07 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-05-06)
- OWL WG agenda for Wednesday 2008-04-23 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-04-22)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-03-28)
- RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-28)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-03-28)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-03-28)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-03-28)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-03-28)
- RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-28)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-03-25)
- RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-24)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-03-23)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-03-23)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-03-23)
- RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-03-23)
- Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-03-23)
- ISSUE-103 (metamapping): Meta Issue to track other issues related to mapping (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-17)
- Re: Specifically on ISSUE-65 (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)) (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-01-10)
- ISSUE-81 (reification, negative assertions): reification unwise in negative property assertions (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-11-28)
Related notes:
2008-06-26 13:46:25: See http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/meeting/2008-06-25 and http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs&diff=8900&oldid=8667
[Ian Horrocks]
Display change log.