ISSUE-67

reification

ACCEPTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation)

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Jie Bao
Opened on:
2007-11-20
Description:
The mapping rules use RDF reification.

However, RDF reification has very weak semantics, making it difficult to achieve an OWL Full semantics that works.

It is unlikely that  RDF graph's constructed with such rules mean what is intended.

This issue deals with the rule to do with axiom annotations, jeremy is splitting off the other rule that deals with negative property assertions.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: RDF features in OWL 2 (from baojie@cs.rpi.edu on 2008-11-05)
  2. Re: RDF features in OWL 2 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-11-05)
  3. RE: RDF features in OWL 2 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-11-05)
  4. Re: RDF features in OWL 2 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-11-04)
  5. RE: RDF features in OWL 2 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-11-04)
  6. Re: RDF features in OWL 2 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-11-04)
  7. Re: RDF features in OWL 2 (from ekendall@sandsoft.com on 2008-11-03)
  8. RE: RDF features in OWL 2 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-11-03)
  9. RE: Resolution of ISSUE-67 implemented (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-07-16)
  10. Resolution of ISSUE-67 implemented (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-16)
  11. RE: ISSUE-67 use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation) (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-07-14)
  12. RE: ISSUE-67 use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation) (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-07-14)
  13. ISSUE-67 use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation) (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-14)
  14. RDF Reification for annotations and negative property assertions (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-05-28)
  15. Re: reification/annotations (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-05-28)
  16. RE: reification/annotations (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-05-28)
  17. Re: reification/annotations (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-05-27)
  18. RE: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-05-07)
  19. Re: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-05-07)
  20. RE: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-05-07)
  21. Agenda for TC 2008-05-07 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-05-06)
  22. OWL WG agenda for Wednesday 2008-04-23 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-04-22)
  23. RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-28)
  24. Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-12 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-03-26)
  25. Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-03-25)
  26. RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-24)
  27. RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-67 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-24)
  28. Proposal to resolve ISSUE-67 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-03-23)
  29. Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-03-23)
  30. ISSUE-103 (metamapping): Meta Issue to track other issues related to mapping (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-17)
  31. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-26)
  32. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-26)
  33. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-26)
  34. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2007-11-23)
  35. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-23)
  36. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2007-11-22)
  37. RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr on 2007-11-22)
  38. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-22)
  39. RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr on 2007-11-22)
  40. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from hendler@cs.rpi.edu on 2007-11-21)
  41. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-21)
  42. RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-21)
  43. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-21)
  44. RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-20)
  45. ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-11-20)

Related notes:

2008-07-17 10:23:50: Closed by introducing new shadow vocabulary: see http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/meeting/2008-07-16#resolution_3
[Ian Horrocks]

2008-07-17 11:40:30: See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jul/0317.html
[Ian Horrocks]

Display change log.

Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Chairs, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker, originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.201 2009/03/10 15:57:30 dom Exp $