ISSUE-65

excess vocab

RESOLVED: excessive duplication of vocabulary

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Jeremy Carroll

Opened on:

2007-11-20

Description:

The member submission documents seem to replace a good many properties from OWL 1.0 with three properties in OWL 1.1. (The old version, and two new versions, one for data properties, and one for object properties)

This:
- creates additional work for implementors
- creates additional work for documentation writers
- potentially creates confusion for people as they learn the language

Do the benefits outweight these (and other) costs?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. implementation of several resolutions in OWL 2 Full Wiki (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-25)
2. Re: Punning discussion (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-01-23)
3. Re: Specifically on ISSUE-65 (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)) (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-01-10)
4. Re: Specifically on ISSUE-65 (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)) (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-01-10)
5. Specifically on ISSUE-65 (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)) (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-01-10)
6. Two small corrections (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)) (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-01-10)
7. Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65) (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-01-10)
8. Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65) (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-01-10)
9. Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65) (from hendler@cs.rpi.edu on 2008-01-09)
10. Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65) (from hendler@cs.rpi.edu on 2008-01-09)
11. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2007-11-27)
12. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-27)
13. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2007-11-27)
14. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-27)
15. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from ivan@w3.org on 2007-11-27)
16. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-27)
17. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from ivan@w3.org on 2007-11-27)
18. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 2007-11-27)
19. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from ivan@w3.org on 2007-11-27)
20. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from ivan@w3.org on 2007-11-27)
21. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2007-11-24)
22. RE: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-22)
23. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-22)
24. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from hendler@cs.rpi.edu on 2007-11-21)
25. RE: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-21)
26. Re: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2007-11-21)
27. RE: ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-21)
28. ISSUE-65 (excess vocab): REPORTED: excessive duplication of vocabulary (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-11-20)

Related notes:

Display change log.