ISSUE-63: RESOLVED: Defining an RDFS compatible semantics

full semantics

RESOLVED: Defining an RDFS compatible semantics

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Jeremy Carroll
Opened on:
2007-11-20
Description:
The member submission docs do not include a start on an OWL Full semantics.
Without this we cannot address the charter requirement:

[[
All new features should have a clear syntax, and a clear semantics both in terms of OWL DL and OWL Full. The existing compatibility between OWL DL and OWL Full should be preserved, and should be extended to new features wherever possible.
]]

Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. implementation of several resolutions in OWL 2 Full Wiki (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-25)
  2. RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-22)
  3. Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-04-21)
  4. RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-21)
  5. Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-04-20)
  6. RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-20)
  7. RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-04-20)
  8. Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-03-31)
  9. RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-31)
  10. Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-03-25)
  11. RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-25)
  12. Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-03-25)
  13. ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-03-25)
  14. Annotation test cases (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-28)
  15. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-26)
  16. RE: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr on 2007-11-22)
  17. Re: ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-22)
  18. ISSUE-63 (full semantics): REPORTED: Defining an RDFS compatible semantics (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-11-20)

Related notes:

See: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2008.04.23/Minutes#Issue_63_Defining_an_RDFS_compatible_semantics

Ian Horrocks, 24 Apr 2008, 13:19:11

Display change log ATOM feed


Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Chair, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.287 2012/02/01 05:29:12 dom Exp $