ISSUE-54: RESOLVED: Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping
Entities as Triples
RESOLVED: Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Rinke Hoekstra
- Opened on:
- 2007-11-07
- Description:
- The RDF mapping document does not provide a mapping for entities (e.g. OWLClass(X), Datatype(Y) etc.) in Table 2. These mappings should be added.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2007-11-21)
- RE: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-21)
- Re: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2007-11-21)
- RE: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-21)
- Re: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping (from hendler@cs.rpi.edu on 2007-11-07)
- ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-11-07)
Related notes:
See emails:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Nov/0144.html
and
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Nov/0145.html
I have fixed certain issues in the translation of EntityAnnotation. Otherwise, it was decided that this is not a bug.
Boris Motik, 21 Nov 2007, 15:19:08Display change log