ISSUE-53
Linear inequality between two data types
MOVED to UCR: Need for arbitrary inequality conditions on two (or more) data types
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Vipul Kashyap
- Opened on:
- 2007-11-04
- Description:
I need the ability to say something like: Patient that (testdate > enrollmentdate + 60) Was trying to represent the following inclusion criteria in a clinical trial: The patient must have negative gadolinium based MRI of the contralateral breast, no more than 6 months prior to study entry.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-07-09)
- Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-07-09)
- RE: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-07-08)
- Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-07-08)
- Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-07-08)
- Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-07-08)
- Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-07)
- Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-07-02)
- Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-07-02)
- Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 2008-07-02)
- Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-07-02)
- Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 2008-07-02)
- Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-07-02)
- ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-02)
- ISSUE-105 (meta/data): Meta Issue to track other issues related to datatypes (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-23)
- Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2007-11-19)
- RE: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 (from VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG on 2007-11-19)
- RE: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 (from VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG on 2007-11-19)
- Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-19)
- Re: ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2007-11-18)
- ISSUE-5: n-ary datatypes - use cases ISSUE-53 (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-12)
- Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-11-06)
- Re: Agenda requests: Issues we can decide? (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2007-11-06)
- RE: ISSUE-53 (Linear inequality between two data types): Need for arbitrary inequality conditions on two (or more) data types (from VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG on 2007-11-04)
- Re: ISSUE-53 (Linear inequality between two data types): Need for arbitrary inequality conditions on two (or more) data types (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2007-11-04)
- ISSUE-53 (Linear inequality between two data types): Need for arbitrary inequality conditions on two (or more) data types (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-11-04)
Related notes:
2007-11-15 03:51:55: See Issue-5 [Ian Horrocks]
2007-11-18 06:43:54: Depends on which n-ary datatypes are permissible, if any. [Alan Ruttenberg]
2008-07-11 16:43:21: Transformed into a usecase for nary datatype predicates, see:
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/N-ary_Data_predicate_use_case
[Ian Horrocks]
2008-07-11 16:43:55: See http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/meeting/2008-07-09#Issue__2d_53
[Ian Horrocks]
Display change log.