ISSUE-4
syntax reordering
RESOLVED: allow reordering in functional syntax
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Peter Patel-Schneider
- Opened on:
- 2007-10-24
- Description:
Some constructs in the functional syntax accept multiple different kinds of sub-constructs have a fixed order. For example, in an ontology the annotations must preceed the axioms. It would be better to allow the sub-constructs to be mixed together, e.g., to allow interspersing of annotations and axioms in an ontology.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: proposal to close issue-4 (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-05-06)
- RE: proposal to close issue-4 (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-05-06)
- proposal to close issue-4 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-05-06)
- ISSUE-4 (syntax reordering): REPORTED allow reordering in functional syntax (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-10-24)
Related notes:
2007-10-29 08:39:19: On further examination, the main construct is Ontology.
The other place that order could be relaxed is annotations in axioms, but this causes problems with EntityAnnotation, as that has two kinds of annotations. Perhaps letting annotations have annotations would fix this, but it would introduce an asymmetry between this construct and the "other" axioms. [Peter Patel-Schneider]
2008-05-21 19:36:54: Resolved with no action taken: see http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2008.05.21/Minutes#Issue_4
[Ian Horrocks]
Changelog:
2007-10-24 20:14:15: Created issue 'REPORTED allow reordering in functional syntax' nickname syntax reordering owned by Peter Patel-Schneider on product , description 'Many constructs in the functional syntax that accept multiple different kinds of sub-constructs have a fixed order. For example, in an ontology the annotations must preceed the axioms. It would be better to allow the sub-constructs to be mixed together, e.g., to allow interspersing of annotations and axioms in an ontology. ' non-public [Peter Patel-Schneider]
2007-10-24 20:15:13: title changed to 'REPORTED: allow reordering in functional syntax' [Peter Patel-Schneider]
2007-10-24 20:15:13: Issue dissociated from any product [Peter Patel-Schneider]
2007-10-29 08:39:19: Description changed to 'Some constructs in the functional syntax accept multiple different kinds of sub-constructs have a fixed order. For example, in an ontology the annotations must preceed the axioms. It would be better to allow the sub-constructs to be mixed together, e.g., to allow interspersing of annotations and axioms in an ontology. ' [Peter Patel-Schneider]
2007-10-29 08:39:19: Issue dissociated from any product [Peter Patel-Schneider]
2007-11-30 23:39:59: title changed to 'ACCEPTED: allow reordering in functional syntax' [Ian Horrocks]
2007-11-30 23:39:59: Issue dissociated from any product [Ian Horrocks]
2008-05-21 19:36:54: title changed to 'RESOLVED: allow reordering in functional syntax'
2008-05-21 19:36:54: Issue dissociated from any product
2008-05-21 19:36:54: Status changed to 'closed'