ISSUE-36: REJECTED: Specifying "join" conditions using path expressions.
joins via paths
REJECTED: Specifying "join" conditions using path expressions.
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Vipul Kashyap
- Opened on:
- 2007-10-25
- Description:
- Reported by kashyap.vipul, Sep 24, 2007
Suppose I have the following ontology:
Class1
Class2
Class3 = {Value-1, ..., Value-K} where Value-i = a string value
OP1
OP2
domain(OP1) = Class1 OR Class2
range(OP1) = Class3
domain(OP2) = Class1
range(OP2) - Class2
Now suppose I want to specify the following constraint:
Given any individual I of Class1, I.OP1 = I.OP2.OP1
Can we specify this using OWL 1.1?
If I specify OP2 o OP1 < OP1, this suggests a subclass of relationship for
all possible domains of a OP1 and OP2, whereas I want it to be true for a
particular set of classes, say Class1, Class2 and Class3.
Furthermore, the subproperty chain might as well be violated as long as
the values are identical per, the constraint above.
Is there some way to specify this using the current OWL 1.1 standard or
would it require an extension to the standard?
Thanks,
---Vipul
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-36 (joins via paths): REPORTED: Specifying 'join' conditions using path expressions. (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-10-25)
Related notes:
This isn't an issue so much as an enquiry.
Ian Horrocks, 1 Dec 2007, 19:21:14Display change log