ISSUE-34: RESOLVED: EDITORIAL: RDF Mapping typographical errors

RDFM typos

RESOLVED: EDITORIAL: RDF Mapping typographical errors

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Bijan Parsia

Opened on:

2007-10-25

Description:

Reported by bparsia, Jul 11, 2007

Table 2 needs a review. Here are some typos I found (but I've not conducted an exhaustive review
yet):

EntityAnnotation(OWLClass(cID)
Annotation(apID1 ct1) ... Annotation(apIDn ctn)) dID T(apIDi) T(cti) 1 ≤ i ≤ n

s/dID/cID/

Also, shouldn't it be T(cID)? Don't I need the OWLClassness to result in a cID rdf:type owl:Class?

Next line:

Annotation(apID1 ct1) ... Annotation(apIDn ctn))

Shouldn't there be a line:
EntityAnnotation(ObjectProperty(opID) ?

Two entries later, s/dpID/iID/

And in all of the entity annotations, I don't see where the type triple gets added.

Comment 1 by bparsia, Jul 12, 2007

This seems to be a typo too:

EntityAnnotation( ObjectProperty(x)
Annotation(a y1 ct1 ) ... Annotation( yn ctn ) )

The "a" doesn't make sense.

Also, translations for Label and Comment seem to be missing.

Reported by ian.r.horrocks, Yesterday (40 hours ago)

owl:Datatype Typo - rdfs:Datatype
owl:FunctionalDataProperty Typo - owl11:FunctionalDataProperty
owl:FunctionalPropety Typo - owl:FunctionalProperty
owl11:FunctionalDataPropety Typo - owl11:FunctionalDataProperty

and in Table 7:

x owl11:subObjectPropertyOf y
{ OnlyOP(x) = true and OnlyOP(y) = true }

Typo - rdfs:subPropertyOf

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. ISSUE-34 (RDFM typos): REPORTED: RDF Mapping typographical errors (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-10-25)

Related notes:

Display change log