ISSUE-32
complex annotations
RESOLVED: How to accomplish complex annotations
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Peter Patel-Schneider
- Opened on:
- 2007-10-25
- Description:
Reported by kearon.mcnicol, Jun 22, 2007 We have numerous parts to our ontologies that require more complex annotations than a simple datatype triple. How should we achieve this in OWL 1.1? For example, we need more advanced labelling functionality than rdfs:label. e.g. we need to state geographic areas where a label is used to refer to a class. In OWL 1.0 we accomplish this using an annotation 'object' property that refers to an individual of our labelUsage class. In this way we can also reason on (and therefore) manage our hundreds of thousands of labelUsage individuals. Until we know how to accomplish at least this minimum, we are nervous about moving from OWL 1.0 to 1.1. Please advise. Kearon McNicol FreshwaterLife Freshwater Biological Association Delete comment Comment 1 by pfpschneider, Oct 11, 2007 Do you mean that you have annotations whose "value" is an anonymous individual? You can, if you want, have an annotation in OWL 1.1 whose value is an individual is a member of labelUsage. The only difference (I think) is that in OWL you have to name this individual.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- annotations (was Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-08-12)
- Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-08-12)
- Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-08-12)
- Re: ISSUE-32 complex annotations (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2007-12-03)
- Re: ISSUE-32 complex annotations (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2007-12-03)
- Re: ISSUE-32 complex annotations (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2007-12-01)
- ISSUE-32 complex annotations (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-12-01)
- Re: Rich Annotations (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2007-11-25)
- ISSUE-32 (complex annotations): REPORTED: How to accomplish complex annotations (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-10-25)
Related notes:
2007-12-02 15:47:05: This is (now) supported in OWL 1.1. [Ian Horrocks]
Changelog:
2007-10-25 07:38:43: Created issue 'REPORTED: How to accomplish complex annotations' nickname complex annotations owned by Peter Patel-Schneider on product , description 'Reported by kearon.mcnicol, Jun 22, 2007 We have numerous parts to our ontologies that require more complex annotations than a simple datatype triple. How should we achieve this in OWL 1.1? For example, we need more advanced labelling functionality than rdfs:label. e.g. we need to state geographic areas where a label is used to refer to a class. In OWL 1.0 we accomplish this using an annotation 'object' property that refers to an individual of our labelUsage class. In this way we can also reason on (and therefore) manage our hundreds of thousands of labelUsage individuals. Until we know how to accomplish at least this minimum, we are nervous about moving from OWL 1.0 to 1.1. Please advise. Kearon McNicol FreshwaterLife Freshwater Biological Association Delete comment Comment 1 by pfpschneider, Oct 11, 2007 Do you mean that you have annotations whose "value" is an anonymous individual? You can, if you want, have an annotation in OWL 1.1 whose value is an individual is a member of labelUsage. The only difference (I think) is that in OWL you have to name this individual. ' non-public [Peter Patel-Schneider]
2007-12-02 15:47:05: title changed to 'RESOLVED: How to accomplish complex annotations' [Ian Horrocks]
2007-12-02 15:47:05: Issue dissociated from any product [Ian Horrocks]
2007-12-02 15:47:05: Status changed to 'closed' [Ian Horrocks]