ISSUE-28: RESOLVED: Multiple facet restrictions per data range

multiple facets

RESOLVED: Multiple facet restrictions per data range

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Bijan Parsia

Opened on:

2007-10-25

Description:

Reported by bparsia, Mar 29, 2007

See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/2007JanMar/0127.html

The current OWL 1.1 specification only allows one facet restriction per data range. This makes it
cumbersome (and unintuitive) to specify ranges such as integer between 30 and 50. t should be
possible to specify multiple facet restrictions for a data range



Comment 1 by bparsia, Mar 29, 2007

See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/2006OctDec/0129.html

Delete comment
Comment 2 by pfpschneider, Oct 11, 2007

The lack of multiple facet restrictions is in line with the move from the frame-like
syntax. If you want to allow DatatypeRestriction(xsd:integer minInclusive 30
maxInclusive 50) in addition to DatatypeRestriction(DatatypeRestriction(xsd:integer
minInclusive 30) maxInclusive 50) then you should also probably argue for
Restriction(foo minCardinality(30) maxCardinality(50)) in addition or instead of
ObjectIntersectionOf(ObjectMinCardinality(foo 30) ObjectMaxCardinality(foo 50))

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. RE: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-02-06)
2. Re: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-02-06)
3. Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) (from msmith@clarkparsia.com on 2008-02-06)
4. RE: ISSUE-28 (multiple facets): REPORTED: Multiple facet restrictions per data range (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-21)
5. Re: ISSUE-28 (multiple facets): REPORTED: Multiple facet restrictions per data range (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-11-07)
6. Re: ISSUE-11 (datatype facets): REPORTED: Specification of which facet is being restricted in a datatype restriction is missing (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2007-10-25)
7. Re: ISSUE-11 (datatype facets): REPORTED: Specification of which facet is being restricted in a datatype restriction is missing (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2007-10-25)
8. ISSUE-28 (multiple facets): REPORTED: Multiple facet restrictions per data range (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-10-25)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log