ISSUE-25
values-class
REJECTED: Specifying a range of values as the extension of a class
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Vipul Kashyap
- Opened on:
- 2007-10-25
- Description:
Can I define a class SmallInteger as follows: SmallInteger = int[>=0, <=5] Currently, the way I have to do it is to define a data type property called value SmallInteger = value only int[>=0, <=5] Is it possible based on the current OWL 1.1 spec?
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROPOSAL to reject ISSUE-25 (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2007-12-18)
- PROPOSAL to reject ISSUE-25 (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2007-12-13)
- ISSUE-25 (values-class): REPORTED: Specifying a range of values as the extension of a class (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-10-25)
Related notes:
2007-12-18 16:31:54: This is a question rather than an issue. See http://www.w3.org/mid/20071213.104546.140257704.pfps%2540research.bell-labs.com [Ian Horrocks]
Changelog:
2007-10-25 04:51:44: Created issue 'REPORTED: Specifying a range of values as the extension of a class' nickname values-class owned by Vipul Kashyap on product , description 'Can I define a class SmallInteger as follows: SmallInteger = int[>=0, <=5] Currently, the way I have to do it is to define a data type property called value SmallInteger = value only int[>=0, <=5] Is it possible based on the current OWL 1.1 spec? ' non-public [Alan Ruttenberg]
2007-12-01 18:51:41: title changed to 'ACCEPTED: Specifying a range of values as the extension of a class' [Ian Horrocks]
2007-12-01 18:51:41: Issue dissociated from any product [Ian Horrocks]
2007-12-18 16:31:54: title changed to 'REJECTED: Specifying a range of values as the extension of a class' [Ian Horrocks]
2007-12-18 16:31:54: Issue dissociated from any product [Ian Horrocks]
2007-12-18 16:31:54: Status changed to 'closed' [Ian Horrocks]