ISSUE-16
entity annotations
ACCEPTED: Entity annotations status
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Jeremy Carroll
- Opened on:
- 2007-10-24
- Description:
Reported by jlc415, Jun 11, 2007 The current spec defines an "entity annotation" as a type of axiom, but other annotations are not axioms. Because all axioms can be annotated, this means that it is possible to annotate an entity annotation. This approach complicates the conceptual model of annotations. Either all annotations should be axioms, or none should. Meta-annotations should be introduced piecemeal merely based mainly on what is easy to encode using the functional syntax. NOTE that this issue has now subsumed Issue 20 (which was rejected). See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/2007JulSep/0007.html- Related Actions Items:
- ACTION-135 on Jeremy Carroll to Drive entity annotations issue (Issue-16) forward to resolution - due 2008-04-28, closed
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-07-11)
- Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-10)
- Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-07-08)
- Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-07)
- Re: discussion of ISSUE-16 - was draft of minutes from telecon of 2 July now available (from ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-07)
- discussion of ISSUE-16 - was draft of minutes from telecon of 2 July now available (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-07-03)
- Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-07-02)
- ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-02)
- enitty annotations (from jjc@hpl.hp.com on 2008-04-29)
- Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) (from msmith@clarkparsia.com on 2008-03-26)
- RE: Question about annotation of and to axioms (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-03-13)
- Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-01-30)
- Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-01-23)
- Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-01-23)
- Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) (from dlm@ksl.stanford.edu on 2008-01-14)
- ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-01-14)
- Re: Rich Annotations (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2007-11-25)
- Re: annotating axioms (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2007-11-07)
- ISSUE-16 (annotation annotation): REPORTED: Annotations of entity annotations (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-10-24)
Related notes:
2007-10-29 09:06:32: The spec currently makes all top-level constructs in an ontology either an import, an annotation of the ontology, or an axiom. It probably would be better to divide axioms into true axioms, declarations, and entity annotations.
Perhaps it would be even better to combine entity annotations and declarations, as they have many of the same purposes.
Another possible changes would be to allow annotations of annotations. [Peter Patel-Schneider]
2008-01-09 17:47:06: Updated to subsume rejected Issue 20 [Ian Horrocks]
2008-03-07 06:35:23: See also http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1204757310.7801.36.camel%40smi-tredmond-li.stanford.edu&forum_name=owlapi-developer [Alan Ruttenberg]
Display change log.