ISSUE-150

Exchange syntax

RESOLVED: Which serialization of OWL are suitable as normative exchange syntaxed?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Jie Bao
Opened on:
2008-10-23
Description:
Which serialization of OWL are suitable as normative exchange syntaxed?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
No related emails

Related notes:

2008-10-23 16:58:45: Conformant OWL reasoners MUST accept RDF/XML. They MAY accept other serializations. Systems publishing OWL2 MUST publish it in RDF/XML if asked (eg with HTTP content-negotiation); they MAY also publish in other serializations.
See: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/meeting/2008-10-23#resolution_8 [Ian Horrocks]

Display change log ATOM feed


Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Chairs, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker, originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.231 2009/11/16 15:00:54 dom Exp $