ISSUE-138
dateTime
RESOLVED: Name of dateTime datatype
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Ian Horrocks
- Opened on:
- 2008-08-04
- Description:
We need to decide whether the dateTime datatype used in the OWL spec will be called xsd:dateTime or owl:dateTime. A reason for choosing the former is that it is familiar and may already be in use in OWL ontologies. A reason for choosing the latter is that the OWL datatype is not exactly the same as the xsd version (in OWL, timezone is mandatory).
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Implemented F2F4-resolutions in RDF-Based Semantics [WAS: F2F resolutions and document changes] (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-11-02)
- Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-10-15)
- Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138) (from msmith@clarkparsia.com on 2008-10-15)
- Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-10-13)
- Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138) (from sandro@w3.org on 2008-10-13)
- proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-10-13)
- Re: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138) (from sandro@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
- Re: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138) (from msmith@clarkparsia.com on 2008-09-30)
- RE: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138) (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-09-30)
- Re: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138) (from msmith@clarkparsia.com on 2008-09-30)
- required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-09-30)
- Re: ISSUE-138 (dateTime): Name of dateTime datatype (from cgolbrei@gmail.com on 2008-08-06)
- ISSUE-138 (dateTime): Name of dateTime datatype (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-08-04)
Related notes:
2008-10-24 11:06:53: Close with an editors' note stating that we will use XSD name when they determine what it is; also note that this is at risk -- we may need to pick a new name if they don't make it to CR on time.
See: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/meeting/2008-10-24#resolution_1
[Ian Horrocks]
Changelog:
2008-08-04 16:41:21: Created issue 'Name of dateTime datatype' nickname dateTime owned by Ian Horrocks on product , description 'We need to decide whether the dateTime datatype used in the OWL spec will be called xsd:dateTime or owl:dateTime. A reason for choosing the former is that it is familiar and may already be in use in OWL ontologies. A reason for choosing the latter is that the OWL datatype is not exactly the same as the xsd version (in OWL, timezone is mandatory).' non-public [Ian Horrocks]
2008-08-04 23:01:33: Status changed to 'open' [Ian Horrocks]
2008-10-24 11:06:53: title changed to 'RESOLVED: Name of dateTime datatype' [Ian Horrocks]
2008-10-24 11:06:53: Issue dissociated from any product [Ian Horrocks]
2008-10-24 11:06:53: Status changed to 'closed' [Ian Horrocks]