ISSUE-138: RESOLVED: Name of dateTime datatype

dateTime

RESOLVED: Name of dateTime datatype

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Ian Horrocks

Opened on:

2008-08-04

Description:

We need to decide whether the dateTime datatype used in the OWL spec will be called xsd:dateTime or owl:dateTime. A reason for choosing the former is that it is familiar and may already be in use in OWL ontologies. A reason for choosing the latter is that the OWL datatype is not exactly the same as the xsd version (in OWL, timezone is mandatory).

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Implemented F2F4-resolutions in RDF-Based Semantics [WAS: F2F resolutions and document changes] (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-11-02)
2. Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-10-15)
3. Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138) (from msmith@clarkparsia.com on 2008-10-15)
4. Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-10-13)
5. Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138) (from sandro@w3.org on 2008-10-13)
6. proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-10-13)
7. Re: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138) (from sandro@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
8. Re: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138) (from msmith@clarkparsia.com on 2008-09-30)
9. RE: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138) (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-09-30)
10. Re: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138) (from msmith@clarkparsia.com on 2008-09-30)
11. required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-09-30)
12. Re: ISSUE-138 (dateTime): Name of dateTime datatype (from cgolbrei@gmail.com on 2008-08-06)
13. ISSUE-138 (dateTime): Name of dateTime datatype (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-08-04)

Related notes:

Display change log