ISSUE-127: documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial]
narynotyet
documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial]
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Alan Ruttenberg
- Opened on:
- 2008-05-24
- Description:
- At least the syntax, rdf mapping, and semantics documents contain portions that refer to nary datatypes. As we have not yet decided to include nary datatypes in OWL 2, these should be removed.
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-235 on Boris Motik to Review N-ary Data predicates spec - due 2008-11-03, closedACTION-236 on Bernardo Cuenca Grau to Review N-ary Data predicates spec - due 2008-11-03, closedACTION-237 on Markus Krötzsch to Review N-ary Data predicates spec - due 2008-11-03, closed- Related emails:
- The 'n-ary hook' in the RDF-Based Semantics (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-11-05)
- proposal to close ISSUE-127 (narynotyet) (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-06-04)
- Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] (from bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk on 2008-05-24)
- Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] (from alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2008-05-24)
- Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] (from hoekstra@uva.nl on 2008-05-24)
- RE: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] (from boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2008-05-24)
- ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-05-24)
Related notes:
Opened per discussion Ian/Alan June 3, 2008. Don't bother addressing until we have resolved whether N-ARY datatypes are specified. If not then the question is whether to leave in syntax as extension point.
Alan Ruttenberg, 5 Jun 2008, 04:55:40Closed on 2008-11-12 as a resolution of the WG's telcom meeting. Given the work on Data Range Extension is proceeding nicely the resolution is not to remove these.
Ivan Herman, 12 Nov 2008, 19:19:03Display change log
