ISSUE-110
CURIE vs. QName
Use of CURIEs in Structural Specification
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Elisa Kendall
- Opened on:
- 2008-04-03
- Description:
Recent comments from the Protocols and Formats WG on the Last Call RDFa documents indicate that there may be issues in referencing / following the approach for using namespace prefixes per the CURIE syntax given in http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-curie-20071126/. These include additional complexity in parsing as well as lack of support in HTML. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0031.html for details and potential recommendations.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-110 (CURIE vs. QName): Use of CURIEs in Structural Specification (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-04-03)
Related notes:
2008-06-30 13:58:36: Rejected per discussion with Ian, as insufficient information is provided. [Alan Ruttenberg]
Changelog:
2008-04-03 19:29:20: Created issue 'Use of CURIEs in Structural Specification' nickname CURIE vs. QName owned by Elisa Kendall on product , description 'Recent comments from the Protocols and Formats WG on the Last Call RDFa documents indicate that there may be issues in referencing / following the approach for using namespace prefixes per the CURIE syntax given in http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-curie-20071126/. These include additional complexity in parsing as well as lack of support in HTML. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0031.html for details and potential recommendations.' non-public [Elisa Kendall]
2008-06-30 13:58:36: Issue dissociated from any product [Alan Ruttenberg]
2008-06-30 13:58:36: Status changed to 'closed' [Alan Ruttenberg]