13:28:54 RRSAgent has joined #er 13:28:54 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/12/12-er-irc 13:28:59 Zakim has joined #er 13:29:06 zakim, this will be ert 13:29:06 ok, shadi; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 13:29:12 meeting: ERT WG 13:29:42 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Dec/0008.html 13:29:47 chair: Shadi 13:30:08 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has now started 13:30:10 agenda+ Content-in-RDF title 13:30:11 +Klaus/Johannes/Thomas 13:30:24 zakim, klaus is really Johannes 13:30:24 +Johannes; got it 13:30:31 agenda+ DOM-in-RDF 13:31:49 + +49.715.aaaa 13:31:50 - +49.715.aaaa 13:31:52 + +49.715.aaaa 13:32:06 zakim, aaaa is really Shadi 13:32:06 +Shadi; got it 13:34:50 +Johannes.a 13:34:53 CarlosV has joined #er 13:35:26 zakim, johannes.a is really CarlosV 13:35:26 +CarlosV; got it 13:38:40 carlosI has joined #er 13:40:41 +Carlos_Iglesias 13:41:01 scribe: Shadi 13:41:08 zakim, take up agendum 1 13:41:08 agendum 1. "Content-in-RDF title" taken up [from shadi] 13:43:52 topic: WCAG 2.0 publication announcement 13:44:18 http://www.w3.org/WAI/#x20071211a 13:45:48 SAZ: WCAG 2.0 published as a last call working draft 13:48:55 ...important milestone, please read it 13:49:07 ...hopefully it meets your expectations 13:49:13 zakim, take up agendum 1 13:49:13 agendum 1. "Content-in-RDF title" taken up [from shadi] 13:49:32 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Dec/0006 13:52:18 CV: missing content of _what_ 13:52:32 ...maybe "content of resources"? 13:53:04 JK: "Web resources" is too narrow 13:53:15 Resource: a network data object identified by a URI [RFC3986]. This definition is adapted from the definition of resource in [RFC2616]. 13:54:20 CV: "Resources Content Representation in RDF" 13:54:58 JK: this definition restricts to objects identified by URIs, this is not always the case 13:54:59 EtnaRosso has joined #er 13:55:09 hi all 13:56:53 CI: reminds me of last meeting, it's about the definition of content 13:57:17 ...agree with johannes, don't like the URI restriction 13:59:04 CV: data objects? 13:59:15 CI: sounds more formal but not much clearer 14:00:52 CV: title doesn't reflect what the document says 14:01:33 SAZ: what does this document say? 14:01:53 CV: describes some resources and data objects 14:03:17 CI: attempt to find several kinds of representations of content we can find on the Web 14:04:27 ...title can't say it all, document should be explanatory 14:04:48 JK: like data objects, if can get rid of URI restriction 14:06:12 SAZ: "Representing Data Content in RDF" 14:06:35 Title: RDF Representation of Resources Content 14:07:48 JK: wouldn't use "resource", RDF is already a resource description 14:08:02 ...using the same word twice but with different meaning is tricky 14:08:43 SAZ: "Representing Objects in RDF" 14:09:38 Title: Data Objects' Content in RDF 14:09:49 CI: as an object-oriented progaramer it is confusing 14:10:24 SAZ: "Content of Data Objects in RDF" 14:10:39 SAZ: "Representing Content of Data Objects in RDF" 14:13:18 SAZ: who cannout live with "Representing Content in RDF" 14:13:34 SAZ: who cannot live with "Representing Content in RDF"? 14:15:08 CV: don't like verb at the beginning 14:15:16 SAZ: what about "Content Representations in RDF"? 14:16:36 JK: like the verb better 14:19:23 SAZ: propose to use "Representing Content in RDF" for now, and start filling out the document 14:19:51 ...it should be narritive, and explain the different ways in which content can be represented in RDF 14:20:23 ...we may be able to get EOWG to look at our doucments before publication, and review them editorially 14:20:53 ...this does however mean delaying publication until the documents are reviewed 14:22:29 RESOLUTION: accept "Representing Content in RDF" as the title 14:23:14 JK: if a different name is proposed, this could replicate changes throughout the document 14:23:23 ...for example the class names etc 14:24:05 CV: we could publish as editor's draft 14:25:29 SAZ: can publish as editor's or internal draft, but need more consensus within the group before we should publish on /TR 14:26:22 zakim, take up nexz 14:26:22 I don't understand 'take up nexz', shadi 14:26:24 zakim, take up next 14:26:24 agendum 2. "DOM-in-RDF" taken up [from shadi] 14:26:28 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Dec/0011.html 14:27:49 JK: this is the DOM Core, there are others in the suite of specification 14:28:00 CV: are we sure we want to go down this road? 14:28:34 ...DOM core may not be that hard, but would be incomplete without the rest 14:28:53 CI: is this dom level 3? 14:28:59 JK: yes, should be 14:30:20 CI: was hoping for something more basic, maybe just a placeholder 14:30:36 ...not necessarily the whole DOM here 14:30:50 just a basic set 14:30:52 e.g. 14:30:56 dom:node 14:31:02 dom:document 14:31:09 dom:element 14:31:14 dom:attribute 14:31:22 and dom:text 14:32:10 CV: inclined to say no, don't go down that path 14:32:39 JK: think of the use cases 14:34:10 SAZ: first question, is what is the effort required? 14:34:25 secondly, do we need to do it now vs in a later version? 14:35:01 -Johannes 14:35:02 -CarlosV 14:35:18 third, will these features be implemented by the group? 14:35:38 SAZ: think about it, we'll talk more about it next week 14:35:43 -Shadi 14:35:57 zakim, drop carlosi 14:35:57 Carlos_Iglesias is being disconnected 14:35:58 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has ended 14:36:00 Attendees were Klaus/Johannes/Thomas, Johannes, +49.715.aaaa, Shadi, CarlosV, Carlos_Iglesias 14:36:05 zakim, bye 14:36:05 Zakim has left #er 14:36:12 rrsagent, make logs world 14:36:17 rrsagent, make minutes 14:36:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/12/12-er-minutes.html shadi 14:36:18 rrsagent, make logs world 14:45:20 rrsagent, bye 14:45:20 I see no action items